{"title":"关于发育不良痣争议的观点。","authors":"M W Piepkorn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1992 an impartial scientific panel concluded that the term \"dysplastic nevus\" has created significant confusion and thus has outlived its usefulness. This chapter reviews the evolution of the controversy and offers a basis for understanding the panel's recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":79452,"journal":{"name":"Pathology (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"2 2","pages":"259-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A perspective on the dysplastic nevus controversy.\",\"authors\":\"M W Piepkorn\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 1992 an impartial scientific panel concluded that the term \\\"dysplastic nevus\\\" has created significant confusion and thus has outlived its usefulness. This chapter reviews the evolution of the controversy and offers a basis for understanding the panel's recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"259-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A perspective on the dysplastic nevus controversy.
In 1992 an impartial scientific panel concluded that the term "dysplastic nevus" has created significant confusion and thus has outlived its usefulness. This chapter reviews the evolution of the controversy and offers a basis for understanding the panel's recommendations.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
