回顾RACR乳房x线摄影QA项目完成的前50例病例:幻象图像质量、处理器控制和剂量考虑。

Australasian radiology Pub Date : 1997-11-01
D McLean, M Eckert, R Heard, W Chan
{"title":"回顾RACR乳房x线摄影QA项目完成的前50例病例:幻象图像质量、处理器控制和剂量考虑。","authors":"D McLean,&nbsp;M Eckert,&nbsp;R Heard,&nbsp;W Chan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Mammography Quality Assurance Programme, recently established by the Royal Australasian College of Radiologists, has processed the first 50 applications. This programme, which closely follows the programme of the American College of Radiology (ACR), utilizes phantom film images, thermoluminescent dosimetry measurement of mean glandular dose, processor control charts, clinical images, equipment reports and required survey information to establish that a centre conforms to a minimum standard in mammography. The present paper describes the initial results of the first phantom images, dose measurements, processor control and survey information. A film review panel of six members has been trained in phantom film reading. Their evaluation of phantom films was compared with film readings by members of the ACR and was found to be in close agreement. Fifty films have been evaluated up to the present time with a failure rate of 26%. The major causes of failure were unacceptable film artefacts and poor contrast (as indicated by reduced fibre and mass visibility). A surprising result was the high failure in processing, where 23% of units reviewed had significant problems, including failure to keep the processor within required control limits. Only one centre recorded a mean glandular dose above 2 mGy with no centre over the 3 mGy limit. A review of the frequency of the quality control testing shows that the acceptance of quality assurance in mammography, while greater than in the initial stages of the ACR programme, is less than current US practice. These initial results for the accreditation process probably reflect an initial period of adjustment, as seen by the high pass rate achieved by centres that have resubmitted material to gain accreditation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75572,"journal":{"name":"Australasian radiology","volume":"41 4","pages":"387-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.\",\"authors\":\"D McLean,&nbsp;M Eckert,&nbsp;R Heard,&nbsp;W Chan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Mammography Quality Assurance Programme, recently established by the Royal Australasian College of Radiologists, has processed the first 50 applications. This programme, which closely follows the programme of the American College of Radiology (ACR), utilizes phantom film images, thermoluminescent dosimetry measurement of mean glandular dose, processor control charts, clinical images, equipment reports and required survey information to establish that a centre conforms to a minimum standard in mammography. The present paper describes the initial results of the first phantom images, dose measurements, processor control and survey information. A film review panel of six members has been trained in phantom film reading. Their evaluation of phantom films was compared with film readings by members of the ACR and was found to be in close agreement. Fifty films have been evaluated up to the present time with a failure rate of 26%. The major causes of failure were unacceptable film artefacts and poor contrast (as indicated by reduced fibre and mass visibility). A surprising result was the high failure in processing, where 23% of units reviewed had significant problems, including failure to keep the processor within required control limits. Only one centre recorded a mean glandular dose above 2 mGy with no centre over the 3 mGy limit. A review of the frequency of the quality control testing shows that the acceptance of quality assurance in mammography, while greater than in the initial stages of the ACR programme, is less than current US practice. These initial results for the accreditation process probably reflect an initial period of adjustment, as seen by the high pass rate achieved by centres that have resubmitted material to gain accreditation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian radiology\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"387-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近由澳大拉西亚皇家放射科医师学院建立的乳房x光检查质量保证计划已经处理了首批50份申请。该方案密切遵循美国放射学会(ACR)的方案,利用幻象胶片图像、热致发光剂量法测量平均腺体剂量、处理器控制图、临床图像、设备报告和所需的调查信息来确定一个中心符合乳房x光检查的最低标准。本文介绍了第一次幻像的初步结果、剂量测量、处理机控制和调查信息。一个由六名成员组成的电影评论小组接受了幻影电影阅读的培训。他们对幻影电影的评价与ACR成员的电影阅读量进行了比较,发现两者非常一致。到目前为止,已经评估了50部电影,失败率为26%。失败的主要原因是不可接受的胶片伪影和对比度差(如纤维和质量可见度降低所示)。一个令人惊讶的结果是高失败率的处理,其中23%的单位审查有重大问题,包括未能保持处理器在要求的控制范围内。只有一个中心的腺体平均剂量超过2毫戈瑞,没有一个中心超过3毫戈瑞的限值。对质量控制检测频率的回顾表明,乳房x光检查质量保证的接受程度虽然高于ACR计划的初始阶段,但低于目前美国的做法。这些认证程序的初步结果可能反映了最初的调整时期,因为重新提交材料以获得认证的中心的通过率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.

The Mammography Quality Assurance Programme, recently established by the Royal Australasian College of Radiologists, has processed the first 50 applications. This programme, which closely follows the programme of the American College of Radiology (ACR), utilizes phantom film images, thermoluminescent dosimetry measurement of mean glandular dose, processor control charts, clinical images, equipment reports and required survey information to establish that a centre conforms to a minimum standard in mammography. The present paper describes the initial results of the first phantom images, dose measurements, processor control and survey information. A film review panel of six members has been trained in phantom film reading. Their evaluation of phantom films was compared with film readings by members of the ACR and was found to be in close agreement. Fifty films have been evaluated up to the present time with a failure rate of 26%. The major causes of failure were unacceptable film artefacts and poor contrast (as indicated by reduced fibre and mass visibility). A surprising result was the high failure in processing, where 23% of units reviewed had significant problems, including failure to keep the processor within required control limits. Only one centre recorded a mean glandular dose above 2 mGy with no centre over the 3 mGy limit. A review of the frequency of the quality control testing shows that the acceptance of quality assurance in mammography, while greater than in the initial stages of the ACR programme, is less than current US practice. These initial results for the accreditation process probably reflect an initial period of adjustment, as seen by the high pass rate achieved by centres that have resubmitted material to gain accreditation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信