Reflection of working memory: ERP mnemonic effects

The study of working memory often utilizes a delayed matching to sample paradigm (DMS). Typically in the matching condition, the test and sample stimuli are identical, raising the possible confound of retinotopic projections for the matching stimuli in contrast to the non-matching stimuli. In the present study, 65 healthy subjects performed a modified delayed matching to sample task while monitoring their ERP waveforms. The stimuli consisted of 60 different sample stimuli (S1) and 60 different test stimuli (S2). Half of the S2s were complementary to the sample stimuli (Fit), the other half of the S2s were not complementary (Nonfit). After S2, the subjects pressed one of the buttons to indicate whether the test stimulus fits the sample stimulus. Our statistical results indicated that the ERPs to sample stimuli differed from the ERPs to test stimuli from 200 ms poststimulus to the end of the recording epoch. The ERPs to fitting stimuli were significantly different from those to non-fitting stimuli from 200 to 400 ms poststimulus. The ERP patterns in the present study may reflect ERP mnemonic effect for working memory. Our results ruled out the retinotopic confound as a potential mediator variable, and are in agreement with other animal or human neurophysiological studies on memory.