来自单一刺激范式的P300:被动任务与主动任务和刺激方式

Ralf Mertens , John Polich
{"title":"来自单一刺激范式的P300:被动任务与主动任务和刺激方式","authors":"Ralf Mertens ,&nbsp;John Polich","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00041-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The P300 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) was elicited with auditory and visual stimuli in separate experiments. Each study compared an </span>oddball paradigm that presented both target and standard stimuli with a single-stimulus paradigm that presented a target but no standard stimuli. Subjects were instructed in different conditions either to ignore the stimuli, press a response key to the target, or maintain a mental count of the targets. For the passive ignore conditions, P300 amplitude from the single-stimulus paradigm was larger than that from the oddball paradigm. For the active tasks, P300 amplitude from the oddball paradigm was larger than that from the single-stimulus paradigm. For the press and count conditions, P300 amplitude and latency were highly similar for the oddball and single-stimulus procedures. The findings suggest that the single-stimulus paradigm can provide reliable cognitive measures in clinical/applied testing for both passive and active response conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"104 6","pages":"Pages 488-497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00041-5","citationCount":"121","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality\",\"authors\":\"Ralf Mertens ,&nbsp;John Polich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00041-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The P300 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) was elicited with auditory and visual stimuli in separate experiments. Each study compared an </span>oddball paradigm that presented both target and standard stimuli with a single-stimulus paradigm that presented a target but no standard stimuli. Subjects were instructed in different conditions either to ignore the stimuli, press a response key to the target, or maintain a mental count of the targets. For the passive ignore conditions, P300 amplitude from the single-stimulus paradigm was larger than that from the oddball paradigm. For the active tasks, P300 amplitude from the oddball paradigm was larger than that from the single-stimulus paradigm. For the press and count conditions, P300 amplitude and latency were highly similar for the oddball and single-stimulus procedures. The findings suggest that the single-stimulus paradigm can provide reliable cognitive measures in clinical/applied testing for both passive and active response conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"volume\":\"104 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 488-497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00041-5\",\"citationCount\":\"121\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 121

摘要

在不同的实验中,听觉和视觉刺激分别激发了事件相关脑电位(ERP)的P300成分。每项研究都比较了一个既有目标刺激又有标准刺激的古怪范式和一个只有目标刺激但没有标准刺激的单一刺激范式。实验对象被要求在不同的条件下忽略刺激,对目标按一个反应键,或者保持对目标的心理计数。在被动忽略条件下,单刺激模式的P300振幅大于奇数刺激模式的P300振幅。对于主动任务,奇数刺激模式的P300振幅大于单一刺激模式。在按压和计数条件下,奇数刺激和单刺激过程的P300振幅和潜伏期高度相似。研究结果表明,单刺激范式可以为被动和主动反应条件的临床/应用测试提供可靠的认知测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality

The P300 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) was elicited with auditory and visual stimuli in separate experiments. Each study compared an oddball paradigm that presented both target and standard stimuli with a single-stimulus paradigm that presented a target but no standard stimuli. Subjects were instructed in different conditions either to ignore the stimuli, press a response key to the target, or maintain a mental count of the targets. For the passive ignore conditions, P300 amplitude from the single-stimulus paradigm was larger than that from the oddball paradigm. For the active tasks, P300 amplitude from the oddball paradigm was larger than that from the single-stimulus paradigm. For the press and count conditions, P300 amplitude and latency were highly similar for the oddball and single-stimulus procedures. The findings suggest that the single-stimulus paradigm can provide reliable cognitive measures in clinical/applied testing for both passive and active response conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信