你如何知道谁需要预防或治疗?

MD Jean-Pierre Devogelaer (Professor and Head of Arthritis Unit)
{"title":"你如何知道谁需要预防或治疗?","authors":"MD Jean-Pierre Devogelaer (Professor and Head of Arthritis Unit)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80019-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Osteoporosis is preventable with the various therapeutic options available today. It is therefore important to reach the patient who needs to be treated. If based only on clinical risk factors there is much room for therapeutic misassignation in both directions: too many and too few treatments. Generally speaking, only bone mass measurement can yield the correct risk for future fracture, and clinical factors taken alone might be misleading. Clinical factors can be used to modulate the therapeutic intervention based on assessment of bone mass. In very elderly people with several risk factors (poor vision, poor balance and awkward gait, use of psychotropic drugs, etc), bone mass measurements probably become less crucial in therapeutic decision, because factors other than bone mineral have also to be actively assessed. All in all, the use of cut offs of bone mineral density balanced with the clinical decision based on an individual examination, will allow assessment of the therapeutic level in a particular patient. A therapeutic intervention will never be an all or nothing phenomenon based on computerized data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77032,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 539-563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80019-2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5 How do you know who needs prevention or treatment?\",\"authors\":\"MD Jean-Pierre Devogelaer (Professor and Head of Arthritis Unit)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80019-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Osteoporosis is preventable with the various therapeutic options available today. It is therefore important to reach the patient who needs to be treated. If based only on clinical risk factors there is much room for therapeutic misassignation in both directions: too many and too few treatments. Generally speaking, only bone mass measurement can yield the correct risk for future fracture, and clinical factors taken alone might be misleading. Clinical factors can be used to modulate the therapeutic intervention based on assessment of bone mass. In very elderly people with several risk factors (poor vision, poor balance and awkward gait, use of psychotropic drugs, etc), bone mass measurements probably become less crucial in therapeutic decision, because factors other than bone mineral have also to be actively assessed. All in all, the use of cut offs of bone mineral density balanced with the clinical decision based on an individual examination, will allow assessment of the therapeutic level in a particular patient. A therapeutic intervention will never be an all or nothing phenomenon based on computerized data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 539-563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80019-2\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950357997800192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950357997800192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

骨质疏松症是可以预防与各种治疗选择今天可用。因此,接触到需要治疗的病人是很重要的。如果仅仅基于临床风险因素,那么在两个方向上都有很大的治疗错误分配的空间:太多和太少的治疗。一般来说,只有骨量测量才能得出未来骨折的正确风险,单独考虑临床因素可能会产生误导。临床因素可以根据骨量的评估来调节治疗干预。对于具有多种危险因素(视力差、平衡能力差、步态笨拙、使用精神药物等)的高龄患者,骨量测量在治疗决策中可能变得不那么重要,因为除骨矿物质外的其他因素也必须积极评估。总而言之,使用骨矿物质密度截断值与基于个体检查的临床决定相平衡,将允许评估特定患者的治疗水平。治疗干预永远不会是基于计算机数据的全有或全无现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
5 How do you know who needs prevention or treatment?

Osteoporosis is preventable with the various therapeutic options available today. It is therefore important to reach the patient who needs to be treated. If based only on clinical risk factors there is much room for therapeutic misassignation in both directions: too many and too few treatments. Generally speaking, only bone mass measurement can yield the correct risk for future fracture, and clinical factors taken alone might be misleading. Clinical factors can be used to modulate the therapeutic intervention based on assessment of bone mass. In very elderly people with several risk factors (poor vision, poor balance and awkward gait, use of psychotropic drugs, etc), bone mass measurements probably become less crucial in therapeutic decision, because factors other than bone mineral have also to be actively assessed. All in all, the use of cut offs of bone mineral density balanced with the clinical decision based on an individual examination, will allow assessment of the therapeutic level in a particular patient. A therapeutic intervention will never be an all or nothing phenomenon based on computerized data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信