Simon Podnar , David B Vodusek , Bojan Trsinar , Zoran Rodi
{"title":"一种儿童神经生理调查方法","authors":"Simon Podnar , David B Vodusek , Bojan Trsinar , Zoran Rodi","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00053-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Characteristics and reproducibility of bulbocavernosus reflex<span><span> (BCR) and pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials<span> (PSEP) elicited by mechanical stimulation<span> in children were tested. Twenty-five male children aged 5-14 years without uroneurological complaints were enrolled in the study. In addition to electrical stimulation, a specially constructed electromechanical hammer triggered by an oscilloscope was used for mechanical stimulation of distal </span></span></span>penis. All responses were detected by surface electrodes. The latencies and amplitudes of averaged as well as latencies of single BCR on single and double electrical stimuli were determined. Mechanical stimulation was described as much less unpleasant than electrical stimulation. Both mechanical/electrical stimulation elicited consistent and reproducible responses in high percentages of children (BCR: average, 80%/71%, single, 94%/100%; PSEP: 96%/96%, respectively). BCR latencies were significantly longer and PSEP amplitudes were significantly higher on mechanical stimulation. The compliance with mechanical was much better than with the electrical stimulation and the former can be recommended for clinical use. The effective mechanical stimulus delivered by a particular mechanical stimulator has a characteristic `delay' (as to the actual point of triggering the oscilloscope ray) which influences the latency reading of responses; appropriate control data are therefore necessary.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"104 5","pages":"Pages 389-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00053-1","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method of uroneurophysiological investigation in children\",\"authors\":\"Simon Podnar , David B Vodusek , Bojan Trsinar , Zoran Rodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00053-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Characteristics and reproducibility of bulbocavernosus reflex<span><span> (BCR) and pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials<span> (PSEP) elicited by mechanical stimulation<span> in children were tested. Twenty-five male children aged 5-14 years without uroneurological complaints were enrolled in the study. In addition to electrical stimulation, a specially constructed electromechanical hammer triggered by an oscilloscope was used for mechanical stimulation of distal </span></span></span>penis. All responses were detected by surface electrodes. The latencies and amplitudes of averaged as well as latencies of single BCR on single and double electrical stimuli were determined. Mechanical stimulation was described as much less unpleasant than electrical stimulation. Both mechanical/electrical stimulation elicited consistent and reproducible responses in high percentages of children (BCR: average, 80%/71%, single, 94%/100%; PSEP: 96%/96%, respectively). BCR latencies were significantly longer and PSEP amplitudes were significantly higher on mechanical stimulation. The compliance with mechanical was much better than with the electrical stimulation and the former can be recommended for clinical use. The effective mechanical stimulus delivered by a particular mechanical stimulator has a characteristic `delay' (as to the actual point of triggering the oscilloscope ray) which influences the latency reading of responses; appropriate control data are therefore necessary.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 389-392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00053-1\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A method of uroneurophysiological investigation in children
Characteristics and reproducibility of bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) and pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials (PSEP) elicited by mechanical stimulation in children were tested. Twenty-five male children aged 5-14 years without uroneurological complaints were enrolled in the study. In addition to electrical stimulation, a specially constructed electromechanical hammer triggered by an oscilloscope was used for mechanical stimulation of distal penis. All responses were detected by surface electrodes. The latencies and amplitudes of averaged as well as latencies of single BCR on single and double electrical stimuli were determined. Mechanical stimulation was described as much less unpleasant than electrical stimulation. Both mechanical/electrical stimulation elicited consistent and reproducible responses in high percentages of children (BCR: average, 80%/71%, single, 94%/100%; PSEP: 96%/96%, respectively). BCR latencies were significantly longer and PSEP amplitudes were significantly higher on mechanical stimulation. The compliance with mechanical was much better than with the electrical stimulation and the former can be recommended for clinical use. The effective mechanical stimulus delivered by a particular mechanical stimulator has a characteristic `delay' (as to the actual point of triggering the oscilloscope ray) which influences the latency reading of responses; appropriate control data are therefore necessary.