两项住院调查的比较:全国出院调查和NHANES I流行病学随访研究。

Q1 Mathematics
L B Russell, E Milan, R Jagannathan
{"title":"两项住院调查的比较:全国出院调查和NHANES I流行病学随访研究。","authors":"L B Russell,&nbsp;E Milan,&nbsp;R Jagannathan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This report compares hospitalization data from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study (NHEFS) with data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), the benchmark for hospitalization in the United States, for men and women 35 years and older for the period 1971-87. The comparison is intended to help analysts evaluate the validity and generality of analyses based on the NHEFS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital stays per 1,000 population and average lengths of stay are compared year by year for each age-sex group and for the entire period. Regression analyses test for differences between the two surveys by age and sex, and for differences in trends over time and the effect of the Medicare program's prospective hospital payment system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital stays per 1,000 population were lower in NHEFS than in NHDS in all age-sex groups at the beginning of the period, but the differences had almost disappeared by 1987. Lengths of stay, although somewhat longer in NHEFS, matched NHDS more closely. Differentials by age and sex were similar in the two surveys for both hospital stays per 1,000 population and length of hospital stay. With its extensive information on baseline risk factors, the NHEFS offers a unique opportunity to study determinants of hospitalization in a representative sample of U.S. adults. The evaluation presented here suggests two points for researchers who want to use the NHEFS. First, including age as a control should largely correct for differences in age distribution between NHEFS and NHDS. Second, a time trend should also be included to capture the effects of several factors that caused the count of stays to be low in the early years of NHEFS followup.</p>","PeriodicalId":23577,"journal":{"name":"Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research","volume":" 123","pages":"i-iii, 1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two surveys of hospitalization: the National Hospital Discharge Survey and the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study.\",\"authors\":\"L B Russell,&nbsp;E Milan,&nbsp;R Jagannathan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This report compares hospitalization data from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study (NHEFS) with data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), the benchmark for hospitalization in the United States, for men and women 35 years and older for the period 1971-87. The comparison is intended to help analysts evaluate the validity and generality of analyses based on the NHEFS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital stays per 1,000 population and average lengths of stay are compared year by year for each age-sex group and for the entire period. Regression analyses test for differences between the two surveys by age and sex, and for differences in trends over time and the effect of the Medicare program's prospective hospital payment system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital stays per 1,000 population were lower in NHEFS than in NHDS in all age-sex groups at the beginning of the period, but the differences had almost disappeared by 1987. Lengths of stay, although somewhat longer in NHEFS, matched NHDS more closely. Differentials by age and sex were similar in the two surveys for both hospital stays per 1,000 population and length of hospital stay. With its extensive information on baseline risk factors, the NHEFS offers a unique opportunity to study determinants of hospitalization in a representative sample of U.S. adults. The evaluation presented here suggests two points for researchers who want to use the NHEFS. First, including age as a control should largely correct for differences in age distribution between NHEFS and NHDS. Second, a time trend should also be included to capture the effects of several factors that caused the count of stays to be low in the early years of NHEFS followup.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research\",\"volume\":\" 123\",\"pages\":\"i-iii, 1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本报告比较了1971-87年期间NHANES I流行病学随访研究(NHEFS)和美国35岁及以上的男性和女性住院数据(NHDS),后者是美国住院基准。该比较旨在帮助分析人员评估基于NHEFS的分析的有效性和普遍性。方法:对各年龄、性别组和整个时期每1000人的住院次数和平均住院时间进行逐年比较。回归分析测试了两项调查在年龄和性别上的差异,以及随着时间的推移趋势的差异和医疗保险计划未来医院支付系统的影响。结果:在所有年龄-性别群体中,NHEFS每1000人的住院时间在初期都低于NHDS,但到1987年这种差异几乎消失了。NHEFS的住院时间虽然稍长一些,但与NHDS更接近。在每1 000人的住院时间和住院时间方面,两次调查中按年龄和性别划分的差异相似。NHEFS提供了关于基线风险因素的广泛信息,为研究美国成年人代表性样本的住院决定因素提供了独特的机会。这里提出的评价对想要使用NHEFS的研究人员提出了两点建议。首先,将年龄作为对照应该在很大程度上纠正NHEFS和NHDS之间年龄分布的差异。其次,还应包括时间趋势,以捕捉在NHEFS随访的早期导致住院次数较低的几个因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of two surveys of hospitalization: the National Hospital Discharge Survey and the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study.

Objectives: This report compares hospitalization data from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study (NHEFS) with data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), the benchmark for hospitalization in the United States, for men and women 35 years and older for the period 1971-87. The comparison is intended to help analysts evaluate the validity and generality of analyses based on the NHEFS.

Methods: Hospital stays per 1,000 population and average lengths of stay are compared year by year for each age-sex group and for the entire period. Regression analyses test for differences between the two surveys by age and sex, and for differences in trends over time and the effect of the Medicare program's prospective hospital payment system.

Results: Hospital stays per 1,000 population were lower in NHEFS than in NHDS in all age-sex groups at the beginning of the period, but the differences had almost disappeared by 1987. Lengths of stay, although somewhat longer in NHEFS, matched NHDS more closely. Differentials by age and sex were similar in the two surveys for both hospital stays per 1,000 population and length of hospital stay. With its extensive information on baseline risk factors, the NHEFS offers a unique opportunity to study determinants of hospitalization in a representative sample of U.S. adults. The evaluation presented here suggests two points for researchers who want to use the NHEFS. First, including age as a control should largely correct for differences in age distribution between NHEFS and NHDS. Second, a time trend should also be included to capture the effects of several factors that caused the count of stays to be low in the early years of NHEFS followup.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studies of new statistical methodology including experimental tests of new survey methods, studies of vital statistics collection methods, new analytical techniques, objective evaluations of reliability of collected data, and contributions to statistical theory. Studies also include comparison of U.S. methodology with those of other countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信