中国人非右利手性与伴或不伴腭裂唇裂的关系。

K A Wentzlaff, M E Cooper, P Yang, C P Aston, Y E Liu, M Melnick, M L Marazita
{"title":"中国人非右利手性与伴或不伴腭裂唇裂的关系。","authors":"K A Wentzlaff,&nbsp;M E Cooper,&nbsp;P Yang,&nbsp;C P Aston,&nbsp;Y E Liu,&nbsp;M Melnick,&nbsp;M L Marazita","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The etiology of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- P) is unclear, although both familial and environmental factors are implicated. Because CL +/- P occurs at approximately the time of brain lateralization and is most often unilateral, developmental asymmetry effects have been postulated in CL +/- P etiology. Handedness is frequently used as an indicator of brain lateralization; therefore, several studies have examined the relationship between cleft laterality and handedness. However, these studies have had conflicting results. The present study investigated handedness in a Chinese sample of 211 non-syndromic CL +/- P surgical probands (ascertained in Shanghai for family studies of CL +/- P), 221 population-based but unmatched controls, and 272 first-degree relatives of the probands. Handedness was assessed by means of laterality quotients (LQ) calculated from questionnaire data. Mean LQ's were compared, as were various arbitrary definitions of handedness based on the LQ, for cases versus controls, males versus females, right-sided versus left-sided clefts, and cleft lip alone versus cleft lip plus cleft palate. CL +/- P cases had a significantly higher proportion of non-right-handedness (NRH) than controls, regardless of the definition of NRH (P values < or = .001). There were no statistically significant differences for any of the other comparisons. Familiarity of NRH was tested by comparing first-degree relatives of cases to controls; first-degree relatives were found to have a significantly higher proportion of NRH than controls, supporting familial effects in NRH. These results support the concept of a common etiology and/or developmental pathway for CL +/- P and handedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":77201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology","volume":"17 3","pages":"141-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between non-right-handedness and cleft lip with or without cleft palate in a Chinese population.\",\"authors\":\"K A Wentzlaff,&nbsp;M E Cooper,&nbsp;P Yang,&nbsp;C P Aston,&nbsp;Y E Liu,&nbsp;M Melnick,&nbsp;M L Marazita\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The etiology of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- P) is unclear, although both familial and environmental factors are implicated. Because CL +/- P occurs at approximately the time of brain lateralization and is most often unilateral, developmental asymmetry effects have been postulated in CL +/- P etiology. Handedness is frequently used as an indicator of brain lateralization; therefore, several studies have examined the relationship between cleft laterality and handedness. However, these studies have had conflicting results. The present study investigated handedness in a Chinese sample of 211 non-syndromic CL +/- P surgical probands (ascertained in Shanghai for family studies of CL +/- P), 221 population-based but unmatched controls, and 272 first-degree relatives of the probands. Handedness was assessed by means of laterality quotients (LQ) calculated from questionnaire data. Mean LQ's were compared, as were various arbitrary definitions of handedness based on the LQ, for cases versus controls, males versus females, right-sided versus left-sided clefts, and cleft lip alone versus cleft lip plus cleft palate. CL +/- P cases had a significantly higher proportion of non-right-handedness (NRH) than controls, regardless of the definition of NRH (P values < or = .001). There were no statistically significant differences for any of the other comparisons. Familiarity of NRH was tested by comparing first-degree relatives of cases to controls; first-degree relatives were found to have a significantly higher proportion of NRH than controls, supporting familial effects in NRH. These results support the concept of a common etiology and/or developmental pathway for CL +/- P and handedness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"141-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非综合征性唇裂伴或不伴腭裂(CL +/- P)的病因尚不清楚,尽管家族和环境因素都有牵连。由于CL +/- P大约发生在大脑偏侧的时候,并且通常是单侧的,因此在CL +/- P的病因学中假设发育不对称效应。惯用手性经常被用作大脑偏侧化的指标;因此,一些研究已经检查了偏裂和利手性之间的关系。然而,这些研究的结果相互矛盾。本研究调查了211名中国无综合征CL +/- P手术先证者(在上海为CL +/- P家庭研究确定)、221名基于人群但不匹配的对照组和272名先证者的一级亲属的手性。用从问卷数据中计算出的偏侧性商数(LQ)来评估手性。我们比较了平均LQ,以及基于LQ的各种任意的利手性定义,包括病例与对照组、男性与女性、右侧与左侧唇裂、唇裂单独与唇裂合并腭裂。无论NRH的定义如何,CL +/- P病例的非右手性(NRH)比例显著高于对照组(P值<或= 0.001)。其他的比较没有统计学上的显著差异。通过比较病例与对照组的一级亲属来检验NRH的熟悉程度;一级亲属的NRH比例明显高于对照组,支持NRH的家族效应。这些结果支持了CL +/- P和手性的共同病因和/或发育途径的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between non-right-handedness and cleft lip with or without cleft palate in a Chinese population.

The etiology of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- P) is unclear, although both familial and environmental factors are implicated. Because CL +/- P occurs at approximately the time of brain lateralization and is most often unilateral, developmental asymmetry effects have been postulated in CL +/- P etiology. Handedness is frequently used as an indicator of brain lateralization; therefore, several studies have examined the relationship between cleft laterality and handedness. However, these studies have had conflicting results. The present study investigated handedness in a Chinese sample of 211 non-syndromic CL +/- P surgical probands (ascertained in Shanghai for family studies of CL +/- P), 221 population-based but unmatched controls, and 272 first-degree relatives of the probands. Handedness was assessed by means of laterality quotients (LQ) calculated from questionnaire data. Mean LQ's were compared, as were various arbitrary definitions of handedness based on the LQ, for cases versus controls, males versus females, right-sided versus left-sided clefts, and cleft lip alone versus cleft lip plus cleft palate. CL +/- P cases had a significantly higher proportion of non-right-handedness (NRH) than controls, regardless of the definition of NRH (P values < or = .001). There were no statistically significant differences for any of the other comparisons. Familiarity of NRH was tested by comparing first-degree relatives of cases to controls; first-degree relatives were found to have a significantly higher proportion of NRH than controls, supporting familial effects in NRH. These results support the concept of a common etiology and/or developmental pathway for CL +/- P and handedness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信