治疗后PSA最低点不能支持治疗前PSA值< 10 ng/ml的患者的剂量递增研究。

D Herold, G Hanks, B Movsas, A Hanlon
{"title":"治疗后PSA最低点不能支持治疗前PSA值< 10 ng/ml的患者的剂量递增研究。","authors":"D Herold,&nbsp;G Hanks,&nbsp;B Movsas,&nbsp;A Hanlon","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:1<15::AID-ROI3>3.0.CO;2-N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With three-dimensional conformal therapy, doses > 75 Gy have been delivered to the prostate with acceptable levels of morbidity; however, higher doses do appear to increase late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity. Because patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values < 10 ng/ml can achieve 3-year actuarial bNED control rates of 90% after treatment with external beam radiotherapy to doses < 71 Gy, one might question the need for further dose escalation in this population. In this report, we examined the relationship between dose and PSA nadir for 90 patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml entered into a dose escalation study from March 1987 to October 1992. We wanted to see if nadir response data would predict a different outcome from our 3-year bNED control reports. All patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy to ICRU reporting point doses of 6,598 cGy to 7,895 cGy (median of 7,068 cGy). Minimum follow-up was 36 months (median, 47 months). Seven hundred thirty-nine posttreatment PSA nadir values were analyzed, yielding an average of 8.2 values per patient. Estimates of rates of bNED control and time to reach a posttreatment PSA of 1.0 ng/ml were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences in rates according to dose levels. Linear regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to relate dose to bNED control on a continuum. Escalating doses from 66 to 79 Gy failed to increase the percentage of patients achieving nadir values < 1 ng/ml and similarly failed to increase the 3-year actuarial bNED control. Linear regression (P = .81) and the chi-square test of association (P = .23) supported the lack of a dose effect on nadir continuously and categorically, respectively, and the Cox regression model supported the conclusion that dose on a continuum has no effect on bNED control (P = .34). Furthermore, time to reach a posttreatment PSA level of 1.0 ng/ml was not statistically dependent on dose level (P = .13). Based on this study and prior reports demonstrating a dose response for late GI/GU morbidity, we question whether further dose escalation in this subgroup of patients is justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":20894,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology investigations","volume":"5 1","pages":"15-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:1<15::AID-ROI3>3.0.CO;2-N","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postradiotherapy PSA nadirs fail to support dose escalation study in patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml.\",\"authors\":\"D Herold,&nbsp;G Hanks,&nbsp;B Movsas,&nbsp;A Hanlon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:1<15::AID-ROI3>3.0.CO;2-N\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With three-dimensional conformal therapy, doses > 75 Gy have been delivered to the prostate with acceptable levels of morbidity; however, higher doses do appear to increase late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity. Because patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values < 10 ng/ml can achieve 3-year actuarial bNED control rates of 90% after treatment with external beam radiotherapy to doses < 71 Gy, one might question the need for further dose escalation in this population. In this report, we examined the relationship between dose and PSA nadir for 90 patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml entered into a dose escalation study from March 1987 to October 1992. We wanted to see if nadir response data would predict a different outcome from our 3-year bNED control reports. All patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy to ICRU reporting point doses of 6,598 cGy to 7,895 cGy (median of 7,068 cGy). Minimum follow-up was 36 months (median, 47 months). Seven hundred thirty-nine posttreatment PSA nadir values were analyzed, yielding an average of 8.2 values per patient. Estimates of rates of bNED control and time to reach a posttreatment PSA of 1.0 ng/ml were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences in rates according to dose levels. Linear regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to relate dose to bNED control on a continuum. Escalating doses from 66 to 79 Gy failed to increase the percentage of patients achieving nadir values < 1 ng/ml and similarly failed to increase the 3-year actuarial bNED control. Linear regression (P = .81) and the chi-square test of association (P = .23) supported the lack of a dose effect on nadir continuously and categorically, respectively, and the Cox regression model supported the conclusion that dose on a continuum has no effect on bNED control (P = .34). Furthermore, time to reach a posttreatment PSA level of 1.0 ng/ml was not statistically dependent on dose level (P = .13). Based on this study and prior reports demonstrating a dose response for late GI/GU morbidity, we question whether further dose escalation in this subgroup of patients is justified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation oncology investigations\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"15-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:1<15::AID-ROI3>3.0.CO;2-N\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation oncology investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:1<15::AID-ROI3>3.0.CO;2-N\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:1<15::AID-ROI3>3.0.CO;2-N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在三维适形治疗中,给予前列腺的剂量> 75 Gy,发病率水平可接受;然而,较高的剂量似乎会增加晚期胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)的发病率。由于预处理前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值< 10 ng/ml的患者在接受剂量< 71 Gy的外束放射治疗后,3年精算bNED控制率可达90%,因此有人可能会质疑在这一人群中是否需要进一步增加剂量。在本报告中,我们对1987年3月至1992年10月90例PSA预处理值< 10 ng/ml的患者进行了剂量递增研究,研究了剂量与PSA最低点之间的关系。我们想看看最低点反应数据是否能预测与我们3年bNED控制报告不同的结果。所有患者均接受ICRU外束放疗,报告点剂量为6,598 cGy至7,895 cGy(中位数为7,068 cGy)。最小随访时间为36个月(中位为47个月)。分析了739个治疗后PSA最低点,平均每个患者的PSA值为8.2。使用Kaplan-Meier产品极限法计算bNED控制率和达到处理后PSA为1.0 ng/ml的时间。对数秩检验用于评估不同剂量水平的率差异。使用线性回归和Cox比例风险模型将剂量与连续体上的bNED控制联系起来。将剂量从66 Gy增加到79 Gy并不能增加达到最低值< 1 ng/ml的患者百分比,同样也不能增加3年精算bNED控制。线性回归(P = 0.81)和关联卡方检验(P = 0.23)分别支持剂量对最低点的连续效应和分类效应,Cox回归模型支持连续剂量对bNED控制无影响的结论(P = 0.34)。此外,达到治疗后PSA水平1.0 ng/ml的时间与剂量水平无关(P = 0.13)。基于这项研究和先前的报告显示晚期GI/GU发病率的剂量反应,我们质疑该亚组患者的进一步剂量增加是否合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postradiotherapy PSA nadirs fail to support dose escalation study in patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml.

With three-dimensional conformal therapy, doses > 75 Gy have been delivered to the prostate with acceptable levels of morbidity; however, higher doses do appear to increase late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity. Because patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values < 10 ng/ml can achieve 3-year actuarial bNED control rates of 90% after treatment with external beam radiotherapy to doses < 71 Gy, one might question the need for further dose escalation in this population. In this report, we examined the relationship between dose and PSA nadir for 90 patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml entered into a dose escalation study from March 1987 to October 1992. We wanted to see if nadir response data would predict a different outcome from our 3-year bNED control reports. All patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy to ICRU reporting point doses of 6,598 cGy to 7,895 cGy (median of 7,068 cGy). Minimum follow-up was 36 months (median, 47 months). Seven hundred thirty-nine posttreatment PSA nadir values were analyzed, yielding an average of 8.2 values per patient. Estimates of rates of bNED control and time to reach a posttreatment PSA of 1.0 ng/ml were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences in rates according to dose levels. Linear regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to relate dose to bNED control on a continuum. Escalating doses from 66 to 79 Gy failed to increase the percentage of patients achieving nadir values < 1 ng/ml and similarly failed to increase the 3-year actuarial bNED control. Linear regression (P = .81) and the chi-square test of association (P = .23) supported the lack of a dose effect on nadir continuously and categorically, respectively, and the Cox regression model supported the conclusion that dose on a continuum has no effect on bNED control (P = .34). Furthermore, time to reach a posttreatment PSA level of 1.0 ng/ml was not statistically dependent on dose level (P = .13). Based on this study and prior reports demonstrating a dose response for late GI/GU morbidity, we question whether further dose escalation in this subgroup of patients is justified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信