肺动脉导管与围手术期预后。

New horizons (Baltimore, Md.) Pub Date : 1997-08-01
A B Leibowitz, Y Beilin
{"title":"肺动脉导管与围手术期预后。","authors":"A B Leibowitz,&nbsp;Y Beilin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the literature addressing use of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in the perioperative patient.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>All pertinent English language articles dealing with the use of pulmonary artery catheterization in perioperative patients were retrieved from 1977 through 1996.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Articles were chosen if the perioperative use of pulmonary artery catheterization was studied or reviewed.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>From the articles selected, information was obtained about changes in therapy and changes in outcome associated with PAC use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, aortic surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and neurosurgery. Information was also extracted about perioperative PAC use in geriatric patients and in patients with preeclampsia.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Low-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery do not appear to benefit from PAC use. Studies looking at high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery are lacking, making accurate determination of patient benefit difficult. The PAC may be useful in the management of some patients undergoing aortic surgery, though recent studies have identified populations of patients that can be safely monitored by less invasive means. Use of the PAC may lead to fewer complications in high-risk patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. Until data are forthcoming, it is not possible to accurately assess the overall impact of PAC use on complications and mortality in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. However, use of the PAC to monitor and treat air embolism in this group of patients does not appear to be appropriate. Routine perioperative use of the PAC does not appear to be appropriate because of age alone. Available scientific data do not support use of the PAC in patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia; however, some experts feel that PAC use may be helpful in the management of selected patients with severe preeclampsia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are no Grade A indications for PAC use in the perioperative period. Current available literature suffers from a lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. Multicentered randomized controlled trials are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79357,"journal":{"name":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary artery catheters and outcome in the perioperative period.\",\"authors\":\"A B Leibowitz,&nbsp;Y Beilin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the literature addressing use of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in the perioperative patient.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>All pertinent English language articles dealing with the use of pulmonary artery catheterization in perioperative patients were retrieved from 1977 through 1996.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Articles were chosen if the perioperative use of pulmonary artery catheterization was studied or reviewed.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>From the articles selected, information was obtained about changes in therapy and changes in outcome associated with PAC use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, aortic surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and neurosurgery. Information was also extracted about perioperative PAC use in geriatric patients and in patients with preeclampsia.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Low-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery do not appear to benefit from PAC use. Studies looking at high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery are lacking, making accurate determination of patient benefit difficult. The PAC may be useful in the management of some patients undergoing aortic surgery, though recent studies have identified populations of patients that can be safely monitored by less invasive means. Use of the PAC may lead to fewer complications in high-risk patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. Until data are forthcoming, it is not possible to accurately assess the overall impact of PAC use on complications and mortality in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. However, use of the PAC to monitor and treat air embolism in this group of patients does not appear to be appropriate. Routine perioperative use of the PAC does not appear to be appropriate because of age alone. Available scientific data do not support use of the PAC in patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia; however, some experts feel that PAC use may be helpful in the management of selected patients with severe preeclampsia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are no Grade A indications for PAC use in the perioperative period. Current available literature suffers from a lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. Multicentered randomized controlled trials are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾有关肺动脉导管在围手术期应用的文献。资料来源:从1977年到1996年,检索了所有与围手术期患者使用肺动脉导管相关的英文文章。研究选择:选择研究或回顾围手术期肺动脉导管使用的文章。数据提取:从所选的文章中,我们获得了在接受心脏手术、主动脉手术、周围血管手术和神经外科手术的患者中使用PAC相关的治疗变化和结果变化的信息。我们还提取了有关老年患者和先兆子痫患者围手术期PAC使用的信息。数据综合:接受心脏手术的低风险患者似乎并未从PAC的使用中获益。目前缺乏对接受心脏手术的高危患者的研究,这使得准确确定患者获益变得困难。尽管最近的研究已经确定了一些患者可以通过侵入性较小的方法进行安全监测,但PAC可能对一些接受主动脉手术的患者的管理有用。高危患者行外周血管手术时,使用PAC可减少并发症。在获得数据之前,不可能准确评估PAC使用对神经外科手术患者并发症和死亡率的总体影响。然而,在这组患者中使用PAC来监测和治疗空气栓塞似乎并不合适。常规围手术期使用PAC似乎并不合适,因为年龄本身。现有的科学数据不支持在无并发症的先兆子痫患者中使用PAC;然而,一些专家认为,PAC的使用可能有助于重症子痫前期患者的管理。结论:围手术期应用PAC无A级指征。目前可用的文献缺乏随机对照临床试验。需要进行多中心随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonary artery catheters and outcome in the perioperative period.

Objective: To review the literature addressing use of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in the perioperative patient.

Data source: All pertinent English language articles dealing with the use of pulmonary artery catheterization in perioperative patients were retrieved from 1977 through 1996.

Study selection: Articles were chosen if the perioperative use of pulmonary artery catheterization was studied or reviewed.

Data extraction: From the articles selected, information was obtained about changes in therapy and changes in outcome associated with PAC use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, aortic surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and neurosurgery. Information was also extracted about perioperative PAC use in geriatric patients and in patients with preeclampsia.

Data synthesis: Low-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery do not appear to benefit from PAC use. Studies looking at high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery are lacking, making accurate determination of patient benefit difficult. The PAC may be useful in the management of some patients undergoing aortic surgery, though recent studies have identified populations of patients that can be safely monitored by less invasive means. Use of the PAC may lead to fewer complications in high-risk patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. Until data are forthcoming, it is not possible to accurately assess the overall impact of PAC use on complications and mortality in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. However, use of the PAC to monitor and treat air embolism in this group of patients does not appear to be appropriate. Routine perioperative use of the PAC does not appear to be appropriate because of age alone. Available scientific data do not support use of the PAC in patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia; however, some experts feel that PAC use may be helpful in the management of selected patients with severe preeclampsia.

Conclusion: There are no Grade A indications for PAC use in the perioperative period. Current available literature suffers from a lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. Multicentered randomized controlled trials are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信