J A Ramos Brieva, A Cordero Villafáfila, E Baca García
{"title":"[构建纽卡斯尔内生指数的效度和信度I]。","authors":"J A Ramos Brieva, A Cordero Villafáfila, E Baca García","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors study the construct validity of the Newcastle's Endogeneity Index (NEI). They use the correlation matrix published originally by Carney et al (1965). The results show a high reliability of the NEI (alpha = 0.77). The Factorial Analysis shows two factors, not independent, that explain a 45% of the total obtained variance; it seem to indicate a drop construct validity of the NEI. The authors discuss the validity of the endogenous/neurotic classification of the depression because of the high agreement the NEI and the clinical criterion.</p>","PeriodicalId":75429,"journal":{"name":"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines","volume":"25 2","pages":"85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Construct validity and reliability of the Newcastle Endogeniety Index I].\",\"authors\":\"J A Ramos Brieva, A Cordero Villafáfila, E Baca García\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors study the construct validity of the Newcastle's Endogeneity Index (NEI). They use the correlation matrix published originally by Carney et al (1965). The results show a high reliability of the NEI (alpha = 0.77). The Factorial Analysis shows two factors, not independent, that explain a 45% of the total obtained variance; it seem to indicate a drop construct validity of the NEI. The authors discuss the validity of the endogenous/neurotic classification of the depression because of the high agreement the NEI and the clinical criterion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"85-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Construct validity and reliability of the Newcastle Endogeniety Index I].
The authors study the construct validity of the Newcastle's Endogeneity Index (NEI). They use the correlation matrix published originally by Carney et al (1965). The results show a high reliability of the NEI (alpha = 0.77). The Factorial Analysis shows two factors, not independent, that explain a 45% of the total obtained variance; it seem to indicate a drop construct validity of the NEI. The authors discuss the validity of the endogenous/neurotic classification of the depression because of the high agreement the NEI and the clinical criterion.