麻醉机设备的性能,不属于食品和药物管理局的日常检查。

F Dexter, S Coffin, J Woodward
{"title":"麻醉机设备的性能,不属于食品和药物管理局的日常检查。","authors":"F Dexter,&nbsp;S Coffin,&nbsp;J Woodward","doi":"10.1023/a:1007302030065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) checkout recommendations are to be applied, at least daily, on anesthesia machines. Devices included in the checkout are crucial to the safe operation of the machine. Remaining devices do not need to be checked as often. However, they should be checked at some appropriate interval. We calculated the reliability of the non-FDA checkout devices, to predict failure rates of these devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 36 North American Drager Narkomed anesthesia machines that were in service a total of 109,410 days at a university hospital. Reliability (i.e., statistical) analyses were done using in-house data recorded by biomedical technicians during 3359 monthly machine inspections. If any one device was operating outside of the limits of the manufacturer's specifications, the machine was labeled as having failed its inspection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assumptions of the failure analysis were satisfied. The mean time between failures equaled 1351 days or 3.7 years (lower 95% confidence bound 1123 days or 3.1 years). The mean daily probability of one or more devices failing to perform within the manufacturer's specification between inspections equaled 1.1, 2.2%, and 4.4% for inspections every 1, 2, or 4 months, respectively. Probabilities that a machine would fail on demand between inspections were approximately equal to the mean daily probabilities of machine failure. The mean number of days per year that a machine would be operating with a device that is outside of the limits of its specifications equaled 4, 8, and 12, days, respectively. The mean daily probabilities of failure and the probabilities of failure on demand were both directly proportional to the inspection interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our failure analysis provides a rational basis for choosing an appropriate inspection interval for anesthesia machines' devices that are not included in the FDA's checkout recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":77199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical monitoring","volume":"13 3","pages":"171-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007302030065","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of anesthesia machines' devices that are not part of the Food and Drug Administration's daily checkout.\",\"authors\":\"F Dexter,&nbsp;S Coffin,&nbsp;J Woodward\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1007302030065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) checkout recommendations are to be applied, at least daily, on anesthesia machines. Devices included in the checkout are crucial to the safe operation of the machine. Remaining devices do not need to be checked as often. However, they should be checked at some appropriate interval. We calculated the reliability of the non-FDA checkout devices, to predict failure rates of these devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 36 North American Drager Narkomed anesthesia machines that were in service a total of 109,410 days at a university hospital. Reliability (i.e., statistical) analyses were done using in-house data recorded by biomedical technicians during 3359 monthly machine inspections. If any one device was operating outside of the limits of the manufacturer's specifications, the machine was labeled as having failed its inspection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assumptions of the failure analysis were satisfied. The mean time between failures equaled 1351 days or 3.7 years (lower 95% confidence bound 1123 days or 3.1 years). The mean daily probability of one or more devices failing to perform within the manufacturer's specification between inspections equaled 1.1, 2.2%, and 4.4% for inspections every 1, 2, or 4 months, respectively. Probabilities that a machine would fail on demand between inspections were approximately equal to the mean daily probabilities of machine failure. The mean number of days per year that a machine would be operating with a device that is outside of the limits of its specifications equaled 4, 8, and 12, days, respectively. The mean daily probabilities of failure and the probabilities of failure on demand were both directly proportional to the inspection interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our failure analysis provides a rational basis for choosing an appropriate inspection interval for anesthesia machines' devices that are not included in the FDA's checkout recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical monitoring\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"171-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007302030065\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007302030065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007302030065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的检查建议至少每天适用于麻醉机。检出装置对机器的安全运行至关重要。剩余的设备不需要经常检查。但是,应该在适当的时间间隔对它们进行检查。我们计算了非fda检查设备的可靠性,以预测这些设备的故障率。方法:本研究纳入36台北美Drager Narkomed麻醉机,这些麻醉机在某大学医院共使用109,410天。使用生物医学技术人员在3359次每月机器检查期间记录的内部数据进行可靠性(即统计)分析。如果任何一种设备在制造商规格的限制之外运行,则该机器被标记为检查不合格。结果:满足失效分析的假设。故障间隔的平均时间为1351天或3.7年(95%置信下限为1123天或3.1年)。在每1个月、2个月或4个月的检查中,一个或多个设备不符合制造商规格的平均每日概率分别为1.1、2.2%和4.4%。机器在两次检查之间按要求发生故障的概率大致等于机器每天发生故障的平均概率。一台机器每年与超出其规格限制的设备一起运行的平均天数分别为4,8和12天。平均每日故障概率和按需故障概率均与检测间隔成正比。结论:我们的失效分析为FDA检查建议中未包括的麻醉机设备选择适当的检查间隔提供了合理的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of anesthesia machines' devices that are not part of the Food and Drug Administration's daily checkout.

Objective: The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) checkout recommendations are to be applied, at least daily, on anesthesia machines. Devices included in the checkout are crucial to the safe operation of the machine. Remaining devices do not need to be checked as often. However, they should be checked at some appropriate interval. We calculated the reliability of the non-FDA checkout devices, to predict failure rates of these devices.

Methods: The study included 36 North American Drager Narkomed anesthesia machines that were in service a total of 109,410 days at a university hospital. Reliability (i.e., statistical) analyses were done using in-house data recorded by biomedical technicians during 3359 monthly machine inspections. If any one device was operating outside of the limits of the manufacturer's specifications, the machine was labeled as having failed its inspection.

Results: Assumptions of the failure analysis were satisfied. The mean time between failures equaled 1351 days or 3.7 years (lower 95% confidence bound 1123 days or 3.1 years). The mean daily probability of one or more devices failing to perform within the manufacturer's specification between inspections equaled 1.1, 2.2%, and 4.4% for inspections every 1, 2, or 4 months, respectively. Probabilities that a machine would fail on demand between inspections were approximately equal to the mean daily probabilities of machine failure. The mean number of days per year that a machine would be operating with a device that is outside of the limits of its specifications equaled 4, 8, and 12, days, respectively. The mean daily probabilities of failure and the probabilities of failure on demand were both directly proportional to the inspection interval.

Conclusions: Our failure analysis provides a rational basis for choosing an appropriate inspection interval for anesthesia machines' devices that are not included in the FDA's checkout recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信