T Markestad, T Vik, G Ahlsten, M Gebre-Medhin, R Skjaerven, G Jacobsen, H J Hoffman, L S Bakketeig
{"title":"足月出生的小胎龄婴儿:生命第一年的生长发育。","authors":"T Markestad, T Vik, G Ahlsten, M Gebre-Medhin, R Skjaerven, G Jacobsen, H J Hoffman, L S Bakketeig","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose was to compare growth patterns and psychomotor development of healthy small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and non-SGA infants, and identify factors predictive of outcome at 13 months of age.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 265 SGA infants and 329 non-SGA controls were identified from a multicenter cohort of 5722 para 1 and 2 women who had been followed during pregnancy. The infants were examined at 2 days and at 13 months of age. Psychomotor development at 13 months was assessed with The Bayley Scale of Infant Development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SGA infants showed partial catch-up growth, but had still lower (mean +/- SEM, p < 0.0001) weight (9750 +/- 65 vs 10505 +/- 67 g), crown-heel length (75.9 +/- 0.2 vs 77.5 +/- 0.2 cm) and head circumference (46.9 +/- 0.1 vs 47.7 +/- 0.1 cm) than the non-SGA infants at 13 months. The SGA children scored equally well on the motor (PDI 106.8 +/- 1.0 vs 107.2 +/- 0.8) but lower on the mental scale (MDI 112.1 +/- 0.8 vs 116.5 +/- 0.7, p < 0.0001) of the Bayley Scale, and the asymmetric SGA scored lower than the symmetric SGA infants (MDI 110.2 +/- 1.3 vs 113.3 +/- 0.9, p = 0.05). In a multivariate regression analysis the parents' growth parameters had the greatest effect on growth measures at 13 months while education and maternal smoking had no significant effect. SGA vs non-SGA status had the greatest effect on growth velocities during infancy. For mental development only SGA vs non-SGA status and the mothers' education made significant contributions, but only accounted for 6% of the variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The negative impact of intrauterine factors on growth are partly abolished by catch-up growth during infancy, and growth parameters at one year of age are mostly determined by genetic factors even in SGA infants. Decreased intrauterine growth may possibly have a negative effect on brain growth and mental developmental potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":75400,"journal":{"name":"Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement","volume":"165 ","pages":"93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants born at term: growth and development during the first year of life.\",\"authors\":\"T Markestad, T Vik, G Ahlsten, M Gebre-Medhin, R Skjaerven, G Jacobsen, H J Hoffman, L S Bakketeig\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose was to compare growth patterns and psychomotor development of healthy small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and non-SGA infants, and identify factors predictive of outcome at 13 months of age.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 265 SGA infants and 329 non-SGA controls were identified from a multicenter cohort of 5722 para 1 and 2 women who had been followed during pregnancy. The infants were examined at 2 days and at 13 months of age. Psychomotor development at 13 months was assessed with The Bayley Scale of Infant Development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SGA infants showed partial catch-up growth, but had still lower (mean +/- SEM, p < 0.0001) weight (9750 +/- 65 vs 10505 +/- 67 g), crown-heel length (75.9 +/- 0.2 vs 77.5 +/- 0.2 cm) and head circumference (46.9 +/- 0.1 vs 47.7 +/- 0.1 cm) than the non-SGA infants at 13 months. The SGA children scored equally well on the motor (PDI 106.8 +/- 1.0 vs 107.2 +/- 0.8) but lower on the mental scale (MDI 112.1 +/- 0.8 vs 116.5 +/- 0.7, p < 0.0001) of the Bayley Scale, and the asymmetric SGA scored lower than the symmetric SGA infants (MDI 110.2 +/- 1.3 vs 113.3 +/- 0.9, p = 0.05). In a multivariate regression analysis the parents' growth parameters had the greatest effect on growth measures at 13 months while education and maternal smoking had no significant effect. SGA vs non-SGA status had the greatest effect on growth velocities during infancy. For mental development only SGA vs non-SGA status and the mothers' education made significant contributions, but only accounted for 6% of the variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The negative impact of intrauterine factors on growth are partly abolished by catch-up growth during infancy, and growth parameters at one year of age are mostly determined by genetic factors even in SGA infants. Decreased intrauterine growth may possibly have a negative effect on brain growth and mental developmental potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"93-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目的是比较健康小胎龄(SGA)和非SGA婴儿的生长模式和精神运动发育,并确定13月龄时预测结果的因素。方法:从5722名妊娠期随访的第1段和第2段妇女的多中心队列中确定了265名SGA婴儿和329名非SGA对照。在婴儿2天和13个月大时进行检查。用贝利婴儿发育量表评估13个月时的精神运动发育。结果:SGA患儿表现出部分追赶性生长,但13月龄时体重(9750 +/- 65 vs 10505 +/- 67 g)、冠跟长(75.9 +/- 0.2 vs 77.5 +/- 0.2 cm)和头围(46.9 +/- 0.1 vs 47.7 +/- 0.1 cm)仍低于非SGA患儿(平均+/- SEM, p < 0.0001)。SGA患儿在Bayley量表的运动方面得分相同(PDI 106.8 +/- 1.0 vs 107.2 +/- 0.8),但在心理方面得分较低(MDI 112.1 +/- 0.8 vs 116.5 +/- 0.7, p < 0.0001),非对称SGA患儿得分低于对称SGA患儿(MDI 110.2 +/- 1.3 vs 113.3 +/- 0.9, p = 0.05)。在多元回归分析中,父母的生长参数对13个月时的生长测量影响最大,而教育和母亲吸烟没有显著影响。SGA与非SGA状态对婴儿期生长速度的影响最大。对于心理发展,只有SGA与非SGA状态和母亲的教育程度有显著贡献,但仅占6%的方差。结论:宫内因素对生长的负面影响在婴儿期被追赶生长部分消除,即使在SGA婴儿中,1岁时的生长参数也主要由遗传因素决定。子宫内生长减少可能对大脑发育和智力发展潜力产生负面影响。
Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants born at term: growth and development during the first year of life.
Background: The purpose was to compare growth patterns and psychomotor development of healthy small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and non-SGA infants, and identify factors predictive of outcome at 13 months of age.
Method: A total of 265 SGA infants and 329 non-SGA controls were identified from a multicenter cohort of 5722 para 1 and 2 women who had been followed during pregnancy. The infants were examined at 2 days and at 13 months of age. Psychomotor development at 13 months was assessed with The Bayley Scale of Infant Development.
Results: The SGA infants showed partial catch-up growth, but had still lower (mean +/- SEM, p < 0.0001) weight (9750 +/- 65 vs 10505 +/- 67 g), crown-heel length (75.9 +/- 0.2 vs 77.5 +/- 0.2 cm) and head circumference (46.9 +/- 0.1 vs 47.7 +/- 0.1 cm) than the non-SGA infants at 13 months. The SGA children scored equally well on the motor (PDI 106.8 +/- 1.0 vs 107.2 +/- 0.8) but lower on the mental scale (MDI 112.1 +/- 0.8 vs 116.5 +/- 0.7, p < 0.0001) of the Bayley Scale, and the asymmetric SGA scored lower than the symmetric SGA infants (MDI 110.2 +/- 1.3 vs 113.3 +/- 0.9, p = 0.05). In a multivariate regression analysis the parents' growth parameters had the greatest effect on growth measures at 13 months while education and maternal smoking had no significant effect. SGA vs non-SGA status had the greatest effect on growth velocities during infancy. For mental development only SGA vs non-SGA status and the mothers' education made significant contributions, but only accounted for 6% of the variance.
Conclusion: The negative impact of intrauterine factors on growth are partly abolished by catch-up growth during infancy, and growth parameters at one year of age are mostly determined by genetic factors even in SGA infants. Decreased intrauterine growth may possibly have a negative effect on brain growth and mental developmental potential.