EPA修订的癌症评估指南的实施:结合机制和药代动力学数据

N.P. Page , D.V. Singh , W. Farland , J.I. Goodman , R.B. Conolly , M.E. Andersen , H.J. Clewell , C.B. Frederick , H. Yamasaki , G. Lucier
{"title":"EPA修订的癌症评估指南的实施:结合机制和药代动力学数据","authors":"N.P. Page ,&nbsp;D.V. Singh ,&nbsp;W. Farland ,&nbsp;J.I. Goodman ,&nbsp;R.B. Conolly ,&nbsp;M.E. Andersen ,&nbsp;H.J. Clewell ,&nbsp;C.B. Frederick ,&nbsp;H. Yamasaki ,&nbsp;G. Lucier","doi":"10.1006/faat.1997.2305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A workshop entitled “Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data” was held in Anaheim, California, in 1996 at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology (SOT). This workshop was jointly sponsored by the Carcinogenesis, Risk Assessment, and Veterinary Specialty Sections of the SOT. The thrust of the workshop was to discuss the scientific basis for the revisions to the EPA Guidelines for cancer assessment and EPA's plans for their implementation. This is the first revision to the original EPA guidelines which have been in use by EPA since 1986. The principal revisions are intended to provide a framework for an increased ability to incorporate biological data into the risk assessment process. Two cases were presented, for chloroform and trichloroethylene, that demonstrated the use of the revised guidelines for specific cancer risk assessments. Using these new guidelines, nonlinear<em>margin of exposure</em>analyses were proposed for these chemicals instead of the<em>linearized multistage model</em>previously used by the EPA as the default method. The workshop participants generally applauded the planned revisions to the EPA guidelines. For the most part, they considered that the revised guidelines represented a positive step which should allow for and encourage the use of biological information in the conduct of cancer risk assessments. Several participants cautioned however that the major problem with cancer risk assessments would continue to be the inadequacy of available data on which to conduct more scientific risk assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100557,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 16-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2305","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data\",\"authors\":\"N.P. Page ,&nbsp;D.V. Singh ,&nbsp;W. Farland ,&nbsp;J.I. Goodman ,&nbsp;R.B. Conolly ,&nbsp;M.E. Andersen ,&nbsp;H.J. Clewell ,&nbsp;C.B. Frederick ,&nbsp;H. Yamasaki ,&nbsp;G. Lucier\",\"doi\":\"10.1006/faat.1997.2305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A workshop entitled “Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data” was held in Anaheim, California, in 1996 at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology (SOT). This workshop was jointly sponsored by the Carcinogenesis, Risk Assessment, and Veterinary Specialty Sections of the SOT. The thrust of the workshop was to discuss the scientific basis for the revisions to the EPA Guidelines for cancer assessment and EPA's plans for their implementation. This is the first revision to the original EPA guidelines which have been in use by EPA since 1986. The principal revisions are intended to provide a framework for an increased ability to incorporate biological data into the risk assessment process. Two cases were presented, for chloroform and trichloroethylene, that demonstrated the use of the revised guidelines for specific cancer risk assessments. Using these new guidelines, nonlinear<em>margin of exposure</em>analyses were proposed for these chemicals instead of the<em>linearized multistage model</em>previously used by the EPA as the default method. The workshop participants generally applauded the planned revisions to the EPA guidelines. For the most part, they considered that the revised guidelines represented a positive step which should allow for and encourage the use of biological information in the conduct of cancer risk assessments. Several participants cautioned however that the major problem with cancer risk assessments would continue to be the inadequacy of available data on which to conduct more scientific risk assessments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2305\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

1996年在加利福尼亚州阿纳海姆举行的第35届毒理学学会年会上,举行了题为“实施EPA修订的癌症评估指南:结合机制和药代动力学数据”的讲习班。本次研讨会由SOT的致癌、风险评估和兽医专业部门联合主办。讲习班的主旨是讨论修订环境保护署癌症评估准则的科学依据以及环境保护署实施这些准则的计划。这是对EPA自1986年以来一直使用的原始EPA指南的第一次修订。主要修订的目的是提供一个框架,以便提高将生物数据纳入风险评估过程的能力。提出了关于氯仿和三氯乙烯的两个案例,证明了将修订后的准则用于特定癌症风险评估。使用这些新指南,对这些化学物质提出了非线性暴露裕度分析,而不是EPA先前使用的线性多阶段模型作为默认方法。研讨会的与会者普遍对EPA指导方针的修订计划表示欢迎。在大多数情况下,他们认为修订后的准则是一个积极的步骤,应该允许和鼓励在进行癌症风险评估时使用生物资料。然而,一些与会者告诫说,癌症风险评估的主要问题仍然是现有数据不足,无法进行更科学的风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data

A workshop entitled “Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data” was held in Anaheim, California, in 1996 at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology (SOT). This workshop was jointly sponsored by the Carcinogenesis, Risk Assessment, and Veterinary Specialty Sections of the SOT. The thrust of the workshop was to discuss the scientific basis for the revisions to the EPA Guidelines for cancer assessment and EPA's plans for their implementation. This is the first revision to the original EPA guidelines which have been in use by EPA since 1986. The principal revisions are intended to provide a framework for an increased ability to incorporate biological data into the risk assessment process. Two cases were presented, for chloroform and trichloroethylene, that demonstrated the use of the revised guidelines for specific cancer risk assessments. Using these new guidelines, nonlinearmargin of exposureanalyses were proposed for these chemicals instead of thelinearized multistage modelpreviously used by the EPA as the default method. The workshop participants generally applauded the planned revisions to the EPA guidelines. For the most part, they considered that the revised guidelines represented a positive step which should allow for and encourage the use of biological information in the conduct of cancer risk assessments. Several participants cautioned however that the major problem with cancer risk assessments would continue to be the inadequacy of available data on which to conduct more scientific risk assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信