N.P. Page , D.V. Singh , W. Farland , J.I. Goodman , R.B. Conolly , M.E. Andersen , H.J. Clewell , C.B. Frederick , H. Yamasaki , G. Lucier
{"title":"EPA修订的癌症评估指南的实施:结合机制和药代动力学数据","authors":"N.P. Page , D.V. Singh , W. Farland , J.I. Goodman , R.B. Conolly , M.E. Andersen , H.J. Clewell , C.B. Frederick , H. Yamasaki , G. Lucier","doi":"10.1006/faat.1997.2305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A workshop entitled “Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data” was held in Anaheim, California, in 1996 at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology (SOT). This workshop was jointly sponsored by the Carcinogenesis, Risk Assessment, and Veterinary Specialty Sections of the SOT. The thrust of the workshop was to discuss the scientific basis for the revisions to the EPA Guidelines for cancer assessment and EPA's plans for their implementation. This is the first revision to the original EPA guidelines which have been in use by EPA since 1986. The principal revisions are intended to provide a framework for an increased ability to incorporate biological data into the risk assessment process. Two cases were presented, for chloroform and trichloroethylene, that demonstrated the use of the revised guidelines for specific cancer risk assessments. Using these new guidelines, nonlinear<em>margin of exposure</em>analyses were proposed for these chemicals instead of the<em>linearized multistage model</em>previously used by the EPA as the default method. The workshop participants generally applauded the planned revisions to the EPA guidelines. For the most part, they considered that the revised guidelines represented a positive step which should allow for and encourage the use of biological information in the conduct of cancer risk assessments. Several participants cautioned however that the major problem with cancer risk assessments would continue to be the inadequacy of available data on which to conduct more scientific risk assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100557,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 16-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2305","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data\",\"authors\":\"N.P. Page , D.V. Singh , W. Farland , J.I. Goodman , R.B. Conolly , M.E. Andersen , H.J. Clewell , C.B. Frederick , H. Yamasaki , G. Lucier\",\"doi\":\"10.1006/faat.1997.2305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A workshop entitled “Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data” was held in Anaheim, California, in 1996 at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology (SOT). This workshop was jointly sponsored by the Carcinogenesis, Risk Assessment, and Veterinary Specialty Sections of the SOT. The thrust of the workshop was to discuss the scientific basis for the revisions to the EPA Guidelines for cancer assessment and EPA's plans for their implementation. This is the first revision to the original EPA guidelines which have been in use by EPA since 1986. The principal revisions are intended to provide a framework for an increased ability to incorporate biological data into the risk assessment process. Two cases were presented, for chloroform and trichloroethylene, that demonstrated the use of the revised guidelines for specific cancer risk assessments. Using these new guidelines, nonlinear<em>margin of exposure</em>analyses were proposed for these chemicals instead of the<em>linearized multistage model</em>previously used by the EPA as the default method. The workshop participants generally applauded the planned revisions to the EPA guidelines. For the most part, they considered that the revised guidelines represented a positive step which should allow for and encourage the use of biological information in the conduct of cancer risk assessments. Several participants cautioned however that the major problem with cancer risk assessments would continue to be the inadequacy of available data on which to conduct more scientific risk assessments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2305\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data
A workshop entitled “Implementation of EPA Revised Cancer Assessment Guidelines: Incorporation of Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Data” was held in Anaheim, California, in 1996 at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology (SOT). This workshop was jointly sponsored by the Carcinogenesis, Risk Assessment, and Veterinary Specialty Sections of the SOT. The thrust of the workshop was to discuss the scientific basis for the revisions to the EPA Guidelines for cancer assessment and EPA's plans for their implementation. This is the first revision to the original EPA guidelines which have been in use by EPA since 1986. The principal revisions are intended to provide a framework for an increased ability to incorporate biological data into the risk assessment process. Two cases were presented, for chloroform and trichloroethylene, that demonstrated the use of the revised guidelines for specific cancer risk assessments. Using these new guidelines, nonlinearmargin of exposureanalyses were proposed for these chemicals instead of thelinearized multistage modelpreviously used by the EPA as the default method. The workshop participants generally applauded the planned revisions to the EPA guidelines. For the most part, they considered that the revised guidelines represented a positive step which should allow for and encourage the use of biological information in the conduct of cancer risk assessments. Several participants cautioned however that the major problem with cancer risk assessments would continue to be the inadequacy of available data on which to conduct more scientific risk assessments.