评估合同测试设施的程序:一个发起人的观点。

M M Twitty, S A Martin, J L Henry, L J Nowicki, M J Dabrowski, L M Veresh
{"title":"评估合同测试设施的程序:一个发起人的观点。","authors":"M M Twitty,&nbsp;S A Martin,&nbsp;J L Henry,&nbsp;L J Nowicki,&nbsp;M J Dabrowski,&nbsp;L M Veresh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The government agencies responsible for Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) place accountability for assuring compliance of studies intended for submission on the sponsor. An initial step toward meeting these legal obligations includes a comprehensive assessment of the candidate testing facility. Literature review has substantiated that the initial evaluation may be best accomplished through both technical and compliance-focused inspections (O'Brien-Pomerleau, 1991; Schroeder, 1989). Combined technical and compliance inspections have also been reported as an effective auditing approach for long-term studies (Hoover and Baldwin, 1984). However, for the purposes of the initial qualifying assessment inspection, personal experiences and published literature indicate that these two equally important evaluations are commonly conducted independently of one another (Scozzie, 1995). A collaborative approach utilized by Dow Corning Corporation in the preliminary assessment of a contract testing facility builds upon those methods just mentioned. Coupling this evaluation with a program of actively monitoring the testing facility's performance in study conduct provides continued assessment and has proven to be beneficial to all stakeholders (sponsor, testing facility, and regulatory agency). Details of the process practiced by this sponsor to assure that studies conducted by a contract testing facility meet GLP requirements are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":77339,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"61-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A procedure for assessing a contract testing facility: one sponsor's perspective.\",\"authors\":\"M M Twitty,&nbsp;S A Martin,&nbsp;J L Henry,&nbsp;L J Nowicki,&nbsp;M J Dabrowski,&nbsp;L M Veresh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The government agencies responsible for Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) place accountability for assuring compliance of studies intended for submission on the sponsor. An initial step toward meeting these legal obligations includes a comprehensive assessment of the candidate testing facility. Literature review has substantiated that the initial evaluation may be best accomplished through both technical and compliance-focused inspections (O'Brien-Pomerleau, 1991; Schroeder, 1989). Combined technical and compliance inspections have also been reported as an effective auditing approach for long-term studies (Hoover and Baldwin, 1984). However, for the purposes of the initial qualifying assessment inspection, personal experiences and published literature indicate that these two equally important evaluations are commonly conducted independently of one another (Scozzie, 1995). A collaborative approach utilized by Dow Corning Corporation in the preliminary assessment of a contract testing facility builds upon those methods just mentioned. Coupling this evaluation with a program of actively monitoring the testing facility's performance in study conduct provides continued assessment and has proven to be beneficial to all stakeholders (sponsor, testing facility, and regulatory agency). Details of the process practiced by this sponsor to assure that studies conducted by a contract testing facility meet GLP requirements are presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"61-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

负责良好实验室规范(GLP)的政府机构负责确保提交的研究符合申办者的要求。履行这些法律义务的第一步包括对候选测试设施进行全面评估。文献回顾证实,通过技术检查和以遵守为重点的检查可以最好地完成初步评价(O'Brien-Pomerleau, 1991;施罗德,1989)。技术检查和遵守检查相结合也被认为是长期研究的有效审计方法(Hoover and Baldwin, 1984)。然而,为了进行初步的合格评估检查,个人经验和已发表的文献表明,这两种同样重要的评估通常是相互独立进行的(Scozzie, 1995)。道康宁公司在合同测试设备的初步评估中使用的协作方法建立在刚才提到的那些方法之上。将此评估与积极监测测试机构在研究行为中的表现的计划相结合,提供了持续的评估,并已被证明对所有利益相关者(赞助商,测试机构和监管机构)有益。为确保合同测试机构所进行的研究符合GLP要求,提供了赞助商所实施过程的细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A procedure for assessing a contract testing facility: one sponsor's perspective.

The government agencies responsible for Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) place accountability for assuring compliance of studies intended for submission on the sponsor. An initial step toward meeting these legal obligations includes a comprehensive assessment of the candidate testing facility. Literature review has substantiated that the initial evaluation may be best accomplished through both technical and compliance-focused inspections (O'Brien-Pomerleau, 1991; Schroeder, 1989). Combined technical and compliance inspections have also been reported as an effective auditing approach for long-term studies (Hoover and Baldwin, 1984). However, for the purposes of the initial qualifying assessment inspection, personal experiences and published literature indicate that these two equally important evaluations are commonly conducted independently of one another (Scozzie, 1995). A collaborative approach utilized by Dow Corning Corporation in the preliminary assessment of a contract testing facility builds upon those methods just mentioned. Coupling this evaluation with a program of actively monitoring the testing facility's performance in study conduct provides continued assessment and has proven to be beneficial to all stakeholders (sponsor, testing facility, and regulatory agency). Details of the process practiced by this sponsor to assure that studies conducted by a contract testing facility meet GLP requirements are presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信