认知疗法与氟西汀治疗心境恶劣障碍的比较

David L. Dunner M.D., Karen B. Schmaling Ph.D., Helen Hendrickson M.D., Joseph Becker Ph.D., Adam Lehman Ph.D., Carolyn Bea B.S.
{"title":"认知疗法与氟西汀治疗心境恶劣障碍的比较","authors":"David L. Dunner M.D.,&nbsp;Karen B. Schmaling Ph.D.,&nbsp;Helen Hendrickson M.D.,&nbsp;Joseph Becker Ph.D.,&nbsp;Adam Lehman Ph.D.,&nbsp;Carolyn Bea B.S.","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:1<34::AID-DEPR4>3.0.CO;2-F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We studied the effects of a fixed dose of fluoxetine (20 mg) or cognitive psycho-therapy in a 16 week trial of patients with dysthymic disorder. More patients assigned to fluoxetine dropped out of the 16 week treatment (33%) than those assigned to cognitive therapy (9%), but this difference did not attain statistical significance. Both treatments showed improvement over baseline conditions at 8 weeks and further improvement at 16 weeks. There were no statistically significant group differences in treatment response. No follow-up data were collected so the enduring effects of the treatments are unknown. An optimal treatment for dysthymic disorder may be combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for a longer period of time. Depression 4:34-41 (1996). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":11179,"journal":{"name":"Depression","volume":"4 1","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:1<34::AID-DEPR4>3.0.CO;2-F","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive therapy versus fluoxetine in the treatment of dysthymic disorder\",\"authors\":\"David L. Dunner M.D.,&nbsp;Karen B. Schmaling Ph.D.,&nbsp;Helen Hendrickson M.D.,&nbsp;Joseph Becker Ph.D.,&nbsp;Adam Lehman Ph.D.,&nbsp;Carolyn Bea B.S.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:1<34::AID-DEPR4>3.0.CO;2-F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We studied the effects of a fixed dose of fluoxetine (20 mg) or cognitive psycho-therapy in a 16 week trial of patients with dysthymic disorder. More patients assigned to fluoxetine dropped out of the 16 week treatment (33%) than those assigned to cognitive therapy (9%), but this difference did not attain statistical significance. Both treatments showed improvement over baseline conditions at 8 weeks and further improvement at 16 weeks. There were no statistically significant group differences in treatment response. No follow-up data were collected so the enduring effects of the treatments are unknown. An optimal treatment for dysthymic disorder may be combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for a longer period of time. Depression 4:34-41 (1996). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"34-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:1<34::AID-DEPR4>3.0.CO;2-F\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7162%281996%294%3A1%3C34%3A%3AAID-DEPR4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7162%281996%294%3A1%3C34%3A%3AAID-DEPR4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

我们研究了固定剂量氟西汀(20mg)或认知心理治疗对心境恶劣障碍患者的16周试验的影响。接受氟西汀治疗的患者(33%)比接受认知治疗的患者(9%)退出了16周的治疗,但这种差异没有统计学意义。两种治疗在8周时均较基线条件有所改善,16周时进一步改善。治疗反应组间差异无统计学意义。由于没有收集后续数据,因此治疗的持久效果尚不清楚。对心境恶劣障碍的最佳治疗可能是长期的心理治疗和药物治疗相结合。抑郁症4:34-41(1996)。©1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive therapy versus fluoxetine in the treatment of dysthymic disorder

We studied the effects of a fixed dose of fluoxetine (20 mg) or cognitive psycho-therapy in a 16 week trial of patients with dysthymic disorder. More patients assigned to fluoxetine dropped out of the 16 week treatment (33%) than those assigned to cognitive therapy (9%), but this difference did not attain statistical significance. Both treatments showed improvement over baseline conditions at 8 weeks and further improvement at 16 weeks. There were no statistically significant group differences in treatment response. No follow-up data were collected so the enduring effects of the treatments are unknown. An optimal treatment for dysthymic disorder may be combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for a longer period of time. Depression 4:34-41 (1996). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信