单剂量福莫特罗和沙丁胺醇与安慰剂逆转甲基苯丙胺所致支气管收缩的作用速度比较

J.R. Beach , C.L. Bromly, A.J. Avery, R.W.E.C. Reid , E.H. Walters , D.J. Hendrick
{"title":"单剂量福莫特罗和沙丁胺醇与安慰剂逆转甲基苯丙胺所致支气管收缩的作用速度比较","authors":"J.R. Beach ,&nbsp;C.L. Bromly,&nbsp;A.J. Avery,&nbsp;R.W.E.C. Reid ,&nbsp;E.H. Walters ,&nbsp;D.J. Hendrick","doi":"10.1006/pulp.1996.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We compared the speeds of action of two doses of the long acting<em>β</em>-agonist formoterol (12<em>μ</em>g and 24<em>μ</em>g) with those of salbutamol (400<em>μ</em>g) and placebo using a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study design in 16 asthmatic subjects. A methacholine test was used on four separate study days to produce a standardized degree of bronchoconstriction (a decrement in FEV1 ≥20%) and one of the study medications as dry powder was administered immediately afterwards via an Aerolizer<sup>TM</sup>inhaler device. The speeds of recovery were estimated from measurements of FEV1 over the following 2–90 min. All active treatments produced significantly greater bronchodilation than placebo as early as 2 min after administration, and their peak effects within 10 min; and no significant differences were noted between them. Mean recovery times by 50% of the FEV1 decrement provoked by methacholine were significantly shorter for the active medications: 5.7 min (formoterol 24<em>μ</em>g), 6.4 min (salbutamol 400<em>μ</em>g), 10.2 min (formoterol 12<em>μ</em>g), and 53.1 min (placebo); the respective times for recovery by 80% being 18.0, 17.4, 22.1, and 83.3 min. We conclude that single doses of the dry powder formulations of all three active treatments produce rapid and effective bronchodilation. This conclusion should not, however, be extrapolated to the regular use of these medications, since differential down-regulation and tachyphylaxis may then exert an influence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74618,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 245-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/pulp.1996.0031","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speeds of Action of Single Doses of Formoterol and Salbutamol Compared with Placebo in Reversing Methacholine-induced Bronchoconstriction\",\"authors\":\"J.R. Beach ,&nbsp;C.L. Bromly,&nbsp;A.J. Avery,&nbsp;R.W.E.C. Reid ,&nbsp;E.H. Walters ,&nbsp;D.J. Hendrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1006/pulp.1996.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We compared the speeds of action of two doses of the long acting<em>β</em>-agonist formoterol (12<em>μ</em>g and 24<em>μ</em>g) with those of salbutamol (400<em>μ</em>g) and placebo using a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study design in 16 asthmatic subjects. A methacholine test was used on four separate study days to produce a standardized degree of bronchoconstriction (a decrement in FEV1 ≥20%) and one of the study medications as dry powder was administered immediately afterwards via an Aerolizer<sup>TM</sup>inhaler device. The speeds of recovery were estimated from measurements of FEV1 over the following 2–90 min. All active treatments produced significantly greater bronchodilation than placebo as early as 2 min after administration, and their peak effects within 10 min; and no significant differences were noted between them. Mean recovery times by 50% of the FEV1 decrement provoked by methacholine were significantly shorter for the active medications: 5.7 min (formoterol 24<em>μ</em>g), 6.4 min (salbutamol 400<em>μ</em>g), 10.2 min (formoterol 12<em>μ</em>g), and 53.1 min (placebo); the respective times for recovery by 80% being 18.0, 17.4, 22.1, and 83.3 min. We conclude that single doses of the dry powder formulations of all three active treatments produce rapid and effective bronchodilation. This conclusion should not, however, be extrapolated to the regular use of these medications, since differential down-regulation and tachyphylaxis may then exert an influence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 245-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/pulp.1996.0031\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952060096900319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952060096900319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

我们采用双盲、随机、交叉研究设计,在16名哮喘受试者中比较了两种长效β激动剂福莫特罗(12μg和24μg)与沙丁胺醇(400μg)和安慰剂的作用速度。在四个独立的研究日进行甲胆碱试验,以产生标准化的支气管收缩程度(FEV1减少≥20%),然后立即通过AerolizerTMinhaler装置给予一种干粉状的研究药物。在随后的2 - 90分钟内,通过测量FEV1来估计恢复速度。所有积极治疗在给药后2分钟就产生了比安慰剂更大的支气管扩张,并且在10分钟内达到峰值;他们之间没有明显的差异。对乙酰胆碱引起的FEV1减少的50%,活性药物组的平均恢复时间显著缩短:5.7 min(福莫特罗24μg)、6.4 min(沙丁胺醇400μg)、10.2 min(福莫特罗12μg)和53.1 min(安慰剂);80%的恢复时间分别为18.0分钟、17.4分钟、22.1分钟和83.3分钟。我们得出结论,所有三种活性治疗的单剂量干粉制剂均可产生快速有效的支气管扩张。然而,这一结论不应外推到这些药物的常规使用,因为不同的下调和快速反应可能会产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speeds of Action of Single Doses of Formoterol and Salbutamol Compared with Placebo in Reversing Methacholine-induced Bronchoconstriction

We compared the speeds of action of two doses of the long actingβ-agonist formoterol (12μg and 24μg) with those of salbutamol (400μg) and placebo using a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study design in 16 asthmatic subjects. A methacholine test was used on four separate study days to produce a standardized degree of bronchoconstriction (a decrement in FEV1 ≥20%) and one of the study medications as dry powder was administered immediately afterwards via an AerolizerTMinhaler device. The speeds of recovery were estimated from measurements of FEV1 over the following 2–90 min. All active treatments produced significantly greater bronchodilation than placebo as early as 2 min after administration, and their peak effects within 10 min; and no significant differences were noted between them. Mean recovery times by 50% of the FEV1 decrement provoked by methacholine were significantly shorter for the active medications: 5.7 min (formoterol 24μg), 6.4 min (salbutamol 400μg), 10.2 min (formoterol 12μg), and 53.1 min (placebo); the respective times for recovery by 80% being 18.0, 17.4, 22.1, and 83.3 min. We conclude that single doses of the dry powder formulations of all three active treatments produce rapid and effective bronchodilation. This conclusion should not, however, be extrapolated to the regular use of these medications, since differential down-regulation and tachyphylaxis may then exert an influence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信