英格兰和威尔士脑膜炎球菌病病例确定模式的变化和趋势。

M Ramsay, E Kaczmarski, M Rush, R Mallard, P Farrington, J White
{"title":"英格兰和威尔士脑膜炎球菌病病例确定模式的变化和趋势。","authors":"M Ramsay,&nbsp;E Kaczmarski,&nbsp;M Rush,&nbsp;R Mallard,&nbsp;P Farrington,&nbsp;J White","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have reviewed data on meningococcal disease routinely collected in England and Wales from 1989 to 1995 to illustrate and explain changing patterns and guide future surveillance. Statutory notifications of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia, laboratory confirmed infections, and death registrations coded as meningococcal disease were analysed in terms of their numbers, the age of cases, season of the report, and (if available) site of isolation, serogroup, and serotype. Case fatality rates were estimated for clinically diagnosed and culture confirmed cases. The number of cases notified each year, in particular those notified as septicaemia, rose significantly over the period (p < 0.0001) but there was no net change in the number of culture confirmed cases. Case fatality rates estimated from routine data fell, most markedly for cases notified as septicaemia, but the true case fatality rate of culture confirmed cases did not change between 1993 and 1995. These data suggest that reporting practice changed between 1989 and 1995 and that the ascertainment of clinically diagnosed disease improved, particularly for meningococcal septicaemia. Late in 1995, reports from all data sources increased and the age distribution of both notified and laboratory confirmed cases changed. These changes were accompanied by an increase in the proportion of infections due to Neisseria meningitidis of serogroup C and a significant increase in serotype C2a infections (p < 0.0001). Continuing efforts to reconcile data from several sources will be needed to ensure that routine data can be interpreted accurately to provide evidence for the development of future vaccination policy and to monitor vaccination programmes. In addition, the role of non-culture diagnosis will be crucial in enhancing surveillance based on clinical diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":77078,"journal":{"name":"Communicable disease report. CDR review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing patterns of case ascertainment and trends in meningococcal disease in England and Wales.\",\"authors\":\"M Ramsay,&nbsp;E Kaczmarski,&nbsp;M Rush,&nbsp;R Mallard,&nbsp;P Farrington,&nbsp;J White\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have reviewed data on meningococcal disease routinely collected in England and Wales from 1989 to 1995 to illustrate and explain changing patterns and guide future surveillance. Statutory notifications of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia, laboratory confirmed infections, and death registrations coded as meningococcal disease were analysed in terms of their numbers, the age of cases, season of the report, and (if available) site of isolation, serogroup, and serotype. Case fatality rates were estimated for clinically diagnosed and culture confirmed cases. The number of cases notified each year, in particular those notified as septicaemia, rose significantly over the period (p < 0.0001) but there was no net change in the number of culture confirmed cases. Case fatality rates estimated from routine data fell, most markedly for cases notified as septicaemia, but the true case fatality rate of culture confirmed cases did not change between 1993 and 1995. These data suggest that reporting practice changed between 1989 and 1995 and that the ascertainment of clinically diagnosed disease improved, particularly for meningococcal septicaemia. Late in 1995, reports from all data sources increased and the age distribution of both notified and laboratory confirmed cases changed. These changes were accompanied by an increase in the proportion of infections due to Neisseria meningitidis of serogroup C and a significant increase in serotype C2a infections (p < 0.0001). Continuing efforts to reconcile data from several sources will be needed to ensure that routine data can be interpreted accurately to provide evidence for the development of future vaccination policy and to monitor vaccination programmes. In addition, the role of non-culture diagnosis will be crucial in enhancing surveillance based on clinical diagnoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicable disease report. CDR review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicable disease report. CDR review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable disease report. CDR review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们审查了1989年至1995年在英格兰和威尔士常规收集的脑膜炎球菌病数据,以说明和解释不断变化的模式并指导未来的监测。对编码为脑膜炎球菌病的脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎和败血症、实验室确诊感染和死亡登记的法定通报进行了分析,包括其数量、病例年龄、报告季节以及(如果有的话)分离地点、血清组和血清型。估计临床诊断和培养确诊病例的病死率。每年报告的病例数,特别是报告为败血症的病例数,在此期间显著上升(p < 0.0001),但培养确诊病例数没有净变化。根据常规数据估计的病死率下降,其中以败血症报告的病例最为明显,但1993年至1995年期间培养确诊病例的真实病死率没有变化。这些数据表明,报告做法在1989年至1995年间发生了变化,临床诊断疾病的确定得到了改善,特别是脑膜炎球菌败血症。1995年后期,所有数据来源的报告都有所增加,通报病例和实验室确诊病例的年龄分布都发生了变化。这些变化伴随着血清C型脑膜炎奈瑟菌感染比例的增加和血清C2a型感染比例的显著增加(p < 0.0001)。需要继续努力协调来自多个来源的数据,以确保能够准确解释常规数据,为制定未来的疫苗接种政策和监测疫苗接种规划提供证据。此外,非培养诊断在加强基于临床诊断的监测方面的作用将是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing patterns of case ascertainment and trends in meningococcal disease in England and Wales.

We have reviewed data on meningococcal disease routinely collected in England and Wales from 1989 to 1995 to illustrate and explain changing patterns and guide future surveillance. Statutory notifications of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia, laboratory confirmed infections, and death registrations coded as meningococcal disease were analysed in terms of their numbers, the age of cases, season of the report, and (if available) site of isolation, serogroup, and serotype. Case fatality rates were estimated for clinically diagnosed and culture confirmed cases. The number of cases notified each year, in particular those notified as septicaemia, rose significantly over the period (p < 0.0001) but there was no net change in the number of culture confirmed cases. Case fatality rates estimated from routine data fell, most markedly for cases notified as septicaemia, but the true case fatality rate of culture confirmed cases did not change between 1993 and 1995. These data suggest that reporting practice changed between 1989 and 1995 and that the ascertainment of clinically diagnosed disease improved, particularly for meningococcal septicaemia. Late in 1995, reports from all data sources increased and the age distribution of both notified and laboratory confirmed cases changed. These changes were accompanied by an increase in the proportion of infections due to Neisseria meningitidis of serogroup C and a significant increase in serotype C2a infections (p < 0.0001). Continuing efforts to reconcile data from several sources will be needed to ensure that routine data can be interpreted accurately to provide evidence for the development of future vaccination policy and to monitor vaccination programmes. In addition, the role of non-culture diagnosis will be crucial in enhancing surveillance based on clinical diagnoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信