精神病学研究中的伦理问题。

N S Lehrman, V H Sharav
{"title":"精神病学研究中的伦理问题。","authors":"N S Lehrman,&nbsp;V H Sharav","doi":"10.1007/BF02898516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article raises questions about the morality and value of experiments conducted mainly on psychiatric patient-subjects whose mental capacity and judgment are often impaired, making them incapable of giving informed consent. Its focus is on experimental studies in which psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia have been knowingly exacerbated by suddenly withdrawing medications that they needed, administering known psychosis-producing substances such as L-dopa and apomorphine, and ignoring the treatment needs of those serving as experimental controls in placebo studies. Concerns are raised about the draft \"Statement of Principles for Ethical Conduct\" by the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Questions are also raised about the adequacy of current safeguards, including federal regulations, peer review, and the trivialization of \"informed consent\" by institutional review boards that operate under veils of secrecy. Implications for mental health policy are discussed, and suggestions are made for improving safeguards and reducing risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02898516","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical problems in psychiatric research.\",\"authors\":\"N S Lehrman,&nbsp;V H Sharav\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02898516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article raises questions about the morality and value of experiments conducted mainly on psychiatric patient-subjects whose mental capacity and judgment are often impaired, making them incapable of giving informed consent. Its focus is on experimental studies in which psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia have been knowingly exacerbated by suddenly withdrawing medications that they needed, administering known psychosis-producing substances such as L-dopa and apomorphine, and ignoring the treatment needs of those serving as experimental controls in placebo studies. Concerns are raised about the draft \\\"Statement of Principles for Ethical Conduct\\\" by the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Questions are also raised about the adequacy of current safeguards, including federal regulations, peer review, and the trivialization of \\\"informed consent\\\" by institutional review boards that operate under veils of secrecy. Implications for mental health policy are discussed, and suggestions are made for improving safeguards and reducing risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mental health administration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02898516\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mental health administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

这篇文章提出了关于主要在精神病患者身上进行的实验的道德和价值的问题,这些患者的精神能力和判断力经常受损,使他们无法给予知情同意。它的重点是实验性研究,在这些研究中,精神分裂症患者的精神病症状故意加剧,因为他们突然停药,服用已知的导致精神病的物质,如左旋多巴和阿波啡,而忽视了安慰剂研究中作为实验对照的治疗需求。美国神经精神药理学学院的“道德行为原则声明”草案引起了人们的关注。人们还对现有保障措施的充分性提出了质疑,包括联邦法规、同行评议以及机构审查委员会在保密的面纱下对“知情同意”的轻视。讨论了对精神卫生政策的影响,并提出了改进保障措施和减少风险的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical problems in psychiatric research.

This article raises questions about the morality and value of experiments conducted mainly on psychiatric patient-subjects whose mental capacity and judgment are often impaired, making them incapable of giving informed consent. Its focus is on experimental studies in which psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia have been knowingly exacerbated by suddenly withdrawing medications that they needed, administering known psychosis-producing substances such as L-dopa and apomorphine, and ignoring the treatment needs of those serving as experimental controls in placebo studies. Concerns are raised about the draft "Statement of Principles for Ethical Conduct" by the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Questions are also raised about the adequacy of current safeguards, including federal regulations, peer review, and the trivialization of "informed consent" by institutional review boards that operate under veils of secrecy. Implications for mental health policy are discussed, and suggestions are made for improving safeguards and reducing risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信