硅氟蚀刻的分子动力学模拟

Adam Darcy , Alema Galijatovic , Ronald Barth , Timothy Kenny , Kristin D. Krantzman , Tracy A. Schoolcraft
{"title":"硅氟蚀刻的分子动力学模拟","authors":"Adam Darcy ,&nbsp;Alema Galijatovic ,&nbsp;Ronald Barth ,&nbsp;Timothy Kenny ,&nbsp;Kristin D. Krantzman ,&nbsp;Tracy A. Schoolcraft","doi":"10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00080-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Molecular dynamics simulations of the reactions between gaseous fluorine atoms and (SiF<sub><em>x</em></sub>)<sub><em>n</em></sub> adsorbates on the Si{100} — (2 × 1) surface are performed using the SW potential and compared to simulations with the WWC reparameterization of the SW potential. Theoretical and experimental work has demonstrated that the reactive fluorosilyl layer during siliconfluorine etching is composed of tower-like adspecies of SiF, SiF<sub>2</sub>, and SiF<sub>3</sub> groups. The objective of the simulations is to determine how the chemical composition, mechanism of formation, and energy distribution of the etched gas-phase products depend on the identity of the reacting adsorbate, the incident kinetic energy, and the parameterization of the potential energy function. Three reactions are simulated: F(g) + SiF<sub>3</sub>(a), F(g) + SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>3</sub>(a), and F(g) + SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>3</sub>(a). SiF<sub>4</sub> is the major product and Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub> and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> are minor products. In Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub> and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>, the silicon-fluorine bond that is formed is stronger than the silicon-silicon bond in the molecule and, therefore, the majority of these products have enough energy to dissociate and will fragment before reaching the detector. An S<sub>N</sub>2-like mechanism is the primary mechanism responsible for the formation of SiF<sub>4</sub>, Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub>, and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>. In addition, at higher energies, the simulations have discovered a previously unknown mechanism for the formation of SiF<sub>4</sub>, which involves an insertion between a silicon-silicon bond. The results of the simulations with the two potentials differ quite substantially in their prediction of the reactivity of the adsorbates. The SW potential predicts a 2- to 3-eV lower energy threshold for reaction and a much higher reaction cross-section, especially for the SiF<sub>4</sub> product. These results are explained in terms of the differences in the potential energy functions used to describe the silicon-fluorine interactions. In addition, the results are compared to experimental data on silicon-fluorine etching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular graphics","volume":"14 5","pages":"Pages 260-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00080-X","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular dynamics simulations of silicon-fluorine etching\",\"authors\":\"Adam Darcy ,&nbsp;Alema Galijatovic ,&nbsp;Ronald Barth ,&nbsp;Timothy Kenny ,&nbsp;Kristin D. Krantzman ,&nbsp;Tracy A. Schoolcraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00080-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Molecular dynamics simulations of the reactions between gaseous fluorine atoms and (SiF<sub><em>x</em></sub>)<sub><em>n</em></sub> adsorbates on the Si{100} — (2 × 1) surface are performed using the SW potential and compared to simulations with the WWC reparameterization of the SW potential. Theoretical and experimental work has demonstrated that the reactive fluorosilyl layer during siliconfluorine etching is composed of tower-like adspecies of SiF, SiF<sub>2</sub>, and SiF<sub>3</sub> groups. The objective of the simulations is to determine how the chemical composition, mechanism of formation, and energy distribution of the etched gas-phase products depend on the identity of the reacting adsorbate, the incident kinetic energy, and the parameterization of the potential energy function. Three reactions are simulated: F(g) + SiF<sub>3</sub>(a), F(g) + SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>3</sub>(a), and F(g) + SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>3</sub>(a). SiF<sub>4</sub> is the major product and Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub> and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> are minor products. In Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub> and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>, the silicon-fluorine bond that is formed is stronger than the silicon-silicon bond in the molecule and, therefore, the majority of these products have enough energy to dissociate and will fragment before reaching the detector. An S<sub>N</sub>2-like mechanism is the primary mechanism responsible for the formation of SiF<sub>4</sub>, Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub>, and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>. In addition, at higher energies, the simulations have discovered a previously unknown mechanism for the formation of SiF<sub>4</sub>, which involves an insertion between a silicon-silicon bond. The results of the simulations with the two potentials differ quite substantially in their prediction of the reactivity of the adsorbates. The SW potential predicts a 2- to 3-eV lower energy threshold for reaction and a much higher reaction cross-section, especially for the SiF<sub>4</sub> product. These results are explained in terms of the differences in the potential energy functions used to describe the silicon-fluorine interactions. In addition, the results are compared to experimental data on silicon-fluorine etching.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of molecular graphics\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 260-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00080-X\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of molecular graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026378559600080X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026378559600080X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

利用SW势对Si{100} - (2 × 1)表面上气态氟原子与(SiFx)n吸附物之间的反应进行了分子动力学模拟,并与SW势的WWC再参数化模拟进行了比较。理论和实验表明,在硅氟蚀刻过程中,反应性氟硅基层是由SiF、SiF2和SiF3基团的塔状基团组成的。模拟的目的是确定蚀刻气相产物的化学组成、形成机制和能量分布如何依赖于反应吸附质的特性、入射动能和势能函数的参数化。模拟了F(g) + SiF3(a)、F(g) + SiF2SiF3(a)和F(g) + SiF2SiF2SiF3(a)三种反应。si4为主要产物,Si2F6和Si3F8为次要产物。在Si2F6和Si3F8中,形成的硅-氟键比分子中的硅-硅键更强,因此,大多数这些产物有足够的能量解离并在到达检测器之前破碎。类似sn2的机制是si4、Si2F6和Si3F8形成的主要机制。此外,在更高的能量下,模拟发现了一种以前未知的SiF4形成机制,它涉及硅-硅键之间的插入。两种电位的模拟结果在预测吸附物的反应性方面差别很大。SW势预测反应的能量阈值为2 ~ 3 ev,反应截面高得多,尤其是SiF4产物。这些结果是用描述硅-氟相互作用的势能函数的差异来解释的。并将所得结果与硅氟刻蚀实验数据进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular dynamics simulations of silicon-fluorine etching

Molecular dynamics simulations of the reactions between gaseous fluorine atoms and (SiFx)n adsorbates on the Si{100} — (2 × 1) surface are performed using the SW potential and compared to simulations with the WWC reparameterization of the SW potential. Theoretical and experimental work has demonstrated that the reactive fluorosilyl layer during siliconfluorine etching is composed of tower-like adspecies of SiF, SiF2, and SiF3 groups. The objective of the simulations is to determine how the chemical composition, mechanism of formation, and energy distribution of the etched gas-phase products depend on the identity of the reacting adsorbate, the incident kinetic energy, and the parameterization of the potential energy function. Three reactions are simulated: F(g) + SiF3(a), F(g) + SiF2SiF3(a), and F(g) + SiF2SiF2SiF3(a). SiF4 is the major product and Si2F6 and Si3F8 are minor products. In Si2F6 and Si3F8, the silicon-fluorine bond that is formed is stronger than the silicon-silicon bond in the molecule and, therefore, the majority of these products have enough energy to dissociate and will fragment before reaching the detector. An SN2-like mechanism is the primary mechanism responsible for the formation of SiF4, Si2F6, and Si3F8. In addition, at higher energies, the simulations have discovered a previously unknown mechanism for the formation of SiF4, which involves an insertion between a silicon-silicon bond. The results of the simulations with the two potentials differ quite substantially in their prediction of the reactivity of the adsorbates. The SW potential predicts a 2- to 3-eV lower energy threshold for reaction and a much higher reaction cross-section, especially for the SiF4 product. These results are explained in terms of the differences in the potential energy functions used to describe the silicon-fluorine interactions. In addition, the results are compared to experimental data on silicon-fluorine etching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信