儿童先发制人镇痛。它存在吗?

Regional anesthesia Pub Date : 1997-03-01
J W Ho, H J Khambatta, L M Pang, R N Siegfried, L S Sun
{"title":"儿童先发制人镇痛。它存在吗?","authors":"J W Ho,&nbsp;H J Khambatta,&nbsp;L M Pang,&nbsp;R N Siegfried,&nbsp;L S Sun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Preemptive analgesia has been evident in animals, but few adult human studies exist demonstrating this concept exist, and there are fewer still in children. Caudal epidural blocks with local anesthetics are often placed for postoperative analgesia in children. This study evaluated whether these blocks are more effective when placed prior to surgical incision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 1-6 years and ASA I and II (n = 51), undergoing elective herniorrhaphy, orchidopexy, or circumcision were randomly assigned to receive a caudal epidural block with 0.6 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, either before incision (n = 28) or after surgery (n = 23). In all patients, anesthesia was induced and maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, and halothane, and caudal epidural blocks were placed. Postoperative pain was scored by a blinded observer using a Faces Pain Scale in the recovery room and was also assessed at home by the parents. Analgesic requirement during the 24-hour period was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Faces Pain Scale scores and analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups, either in the recovery room or at home (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although preemptive analgesia has been successfully demonstrated in some earlier clinical studies, our results indicate that pre- and postincisional caudal epidural blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine were equally effective in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":77347,"journal":{"name":"Regional anesthesia","volume":"22 2","pages":"125-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preemptive analgesia in children. Does it exist?\",\"authors\":\"J W Ho,&nbsp;H J Khambatta,&nbsp;L M Pang,&nbsp;R N Siegfried,&nbsp;L S Sun\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Preemptive analgesia has been evident in animals, but few adult human studies exist demonstrating this concept exist, and there are fewer still in children. Caudal epidural blocks with local anesthetics are often placed for postoperative analgesia in children. This study evaluated whether these blocks are more effective when placed prior to surgical incision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 1-6 years and ASA I and II (n = 51), undergoing elective herniorrhaphy, orchidopexy, or circumcision were randomly assigned to receive a caudal epidural block with 0.6 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, either before incision (n = 28) or after surgery (n = 23). In all patients, anesthesia was induced and maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, and halothane, and caudal epidural blocks were placed. Postoperative pain was scored by a blinded observer using a Faces Pain Scale in the recovery room and was also assessed at home by the parents. Analgesic requirement during the 24-hour period was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Faces Pain Scale scores and analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups, either in the recovery room or at home (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although preemptive analgesia has been successfully demonstrated in some earlier clinical studies, our results indicate that pre- and postincisional caudal epidural blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine were equally effective in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"125-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:先发制人的镇痛在动物中已经很明显,但很少有成人研究证明这一概念的存在,在儿童中的研究更少。尾侧硬膜外阻滞加局麻药常用于儿童术后镇痛。本研究评估了在手术切口前放置这些阻滞是否更有效。方法:年龄在1-6岁,ASA I和II级的儿童(n = 51),接受择期疝修补术、睾丸切除术或包皮环切术,随机分配接受0.6 mL/kg 0.25%布比卡因加1:20万肾上腺素的尾侧硬膜外阻滞,分别在切口前(n = 28)和术后(n = 23)。所有患者均以氧气、氧化亚氮和氟烷诱导和维持麻醉,并在尾侧放置硬膜外阻滞。术后疼痛由一名盲眼观察者在恢复室使用面部疼痛量表进行评分,并由父母在家评估。记录24小时内的镇痛需求。结果:两组患者在康复室和家中的面部疼痛量表评分和镇痛需求差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:虽然在一些早期的临床研究中已经成功地证明了先发制人的镇痛,但我们的研究结果表明,0.25%布比卡因的切口前和切口后尾侧硬膜外阻滞对儿童同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preemptive analgesia in children. Does it exist?

Background and objectives: Preemptive analgesia has been evident in animals, but few adult human studies exist demonstrating this concept exist, and there are fewer still in children. Caudal epidural blocks with local anesthetics are often placed for postoperative analgesia in children. This study evaluated whether these blocks are more effective when placed prior to surgical incision.

Methods: Children aged 1-6 years and ASA I and II (n = 51), undergoing elective herniorrhaphy, orchidopexy, or circumcision were randomly assigned to receive a caudal epidural block with 0.6 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, either before incision (n = 28) or after surgery (n = 23). In all patients, anesthesia was induced and maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, and halothane, and caudal epidural blocks were placed. Postoperative pain was scored by a blinded observer using a Faces Pain Scale in the recovery room and was also assessed at home by the parents. Analgesic requirement during the 24-hour period was recorded.

Results: The Faces Pain Scale scores and analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups, either in the recovery room or at home (P > .05).

Conclusions: Although preemptive analgesia has been successfully demonstrated in some earlier clinical studies, our results indicate that pre- and postincisional caudal epidural blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine were equally effective in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信