5未来治疗

MD, PhD Ferdinand C. Breedveld (Professor, Head of Department)
{"title":"5未来治疗","authors":"MD, PhD Ferdinand C. Breedveld (Professor, Head of Department)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80034-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) becomes more clearly defined there is the expectation that biotechnological advances may allow additional forms of therapeutic intervention that are specific for the disease process. The purpose of this review is to describe the use of biological agents in the treatment of RA. Encouraging results in animal models using vaccines based on the pathogenic T-cell or the autoantigen have prompted the design of selective immune-based therapies. Preliminary studies following this strategy have not yet shown clinical efficacy. The results of early studies with monoclonal antibodies against leukocyte surface antigen were promising but were not sustained in controlled studies. Exciting data have been collected from placebo-controlled studies of monoclonal antibodies against TNFα. The development of biological agents in RA may not be as quick as expected but the steady progress makes it likely that our weapons to combat unwanted autoimmune responses will become more accurate and effective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77032,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 83-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80034-9","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5 Future treatment\",\"authors\":\"MD, PhD Ferdinand C. Breedveld (Professor, Head of Department)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80034-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) becomes more clearly defined there is the expectation that biotechnological advances may allow additional forms of therapeutic intervention that are specific for the disease process. The purpose of this review is to describe the use of biological agents in the treatment of RA. Encouraging results in animal models using vaccines based on the pathogenic T-cell or the autoantigen have prompted the design of selective immune-based therapies. Preliminary studies following this strategy have not yet shown clinical efficacy. The results of early studies with monoclonal antibodies against leukocyte surface antigen were promising but were not sustained in controlled studies. Exciting data have been collected from placebo-controlled studies of monoclonal antibodies against TNFα. The development of biological agents in RA may not be as quick as expected but the steady progress makes it likely that our weapons to combat unwanted autoimmune responses will become more accurate and effective.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 83-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80034-9\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950357997800349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950357997800349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着类风湿性关节炎(RA)的病理生理学变得更加明确,人们期望生物技术的进步可能允许针对疾病过程的额外形式的治疗干预。本综述的目的是描述生物制剂在类风湿关节炎治疗中的应用。使用基于致病性t细胞或自身抗原的疫苗在动物模型中取得了令人鼓舞的结果,这促使了选择性免疫治疗的设计。该策略的初步研究尚未显示出临床疗效。针对白细胞表面抗原的单克隆抗体的早期研究结果是有希望的,但在对照研究中没有得到持续的支持。从针对TNFα的单克隆抗体的安慰剂对照研究中收集了令人兴奋的数据。类风湿性关节炎生物制剂的发展可能没有预期的那么快,但稳步的进展可能使我们对抗不必要的自身免疫反应的武器变得更加准确和有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
5 Future treatment

As the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) becomes more clearly defined there is the expectation that biotechnological advances may allow additional forms of therapeutic intervention that are specific for the disease process. The purpose of this review is to describe the use of biological agents in the treatment of RA. Encouraging results in animal models using vaccines based on the pathogenic T-cell or the autoantigen have prompted the design of selective immune-based therapies. Preliminary studies following this strategy have not yet shown clinical efficacy. The results of early studies with monoclonal antibodies against leukocyte surface antigen were promising but were not sustained in controlled studies. Exciting data have been collected from placebo-controlled studies of monoclonal antibodies against TNFα. The development of biological agents in RA may not be as quick as expected but the steady progress makes it likely that our weapons to combat unwanted autoimmune responses will become more accurate and effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信