分离膜生物可吸收膜在防粘连中的作用。

D E Beck
{"title":"分离膜生物可吸收膜在防粘连中的作用。","authors":"D E Beck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate, the safety and efficacy of Seprafilm, a novel bioresorbable membrane of chemically modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose, in preventing and reducing postoperative adhesion formation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, controlled, blinded, prospective multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Major academic surgical centers.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>183 (treatment, n = 91; control, n = 92) patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal J-pouch anastomosis with diverting ileostomy followed by second-stage laparoscopy for ileostomy closure and direct visual assessment of the peritoneal cavity. Before abdominal closure in treated patients, Seprafilm, averaging 406.9 cm2 per patient, was applied without suturing between the midline incision and underlying tissues and organs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Determination of the incidence, extent (mean percentage of midline incision associated with adhesions), severity (grade 1, least severe; grade 2, moderately severe; grade 3, very severe), and distribution of adhesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 175 (treatment, n = 90) evaluable patients, Seprafilm significantly reduced the incidence (49% and 94%, respectively, p < 0.0001), extent (23% and 63%, respectively, p < 0.0001), and severity (15% versus 58% grade 3 severity, respectively, p < 0.0001) of postoperative adhesions. Seprafilm decreased the rate of adhesion formation by nearly 50%. More than half (51%) of Seprafilm recipients were adhesion-free, versus only 6% of untreated patients. Thus treated patients were eight times more likely to be free of adhesions than untreated controls. The incidence of incisional adhesions associated with the omentum, small bowel, left sidewall, bladder, ileostomy, and stomach was significantly reduced in the Seprafilm patients. Effects on vital signs and laboratory parameters were comparable in the two groups and were attributable to the operative procedure, concomitant therapy, or comorbid disease. All reported adverse events were associated with the surgical procedure and/or comorbid disease and did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Seprafilm is safe and significantly reduces the incidence, extent, and severity of postoperative adhesions to the midline incision compared with no treatment, the current standard of surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":77418,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement","volume":" 577","pages":"49-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane in adhesion prevention.\",\"authors\":\"D E Beck\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate, the safety and efficacy of Seprafilm, a novel bioresorbable membrane of chemically modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose, in preventing and reducing postoperative adhesion formation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, controlled, blinded, prospective multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Major academic surgical centers.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>183 (treatment, n = 91; control, n = 92) patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal J-pouch anastomosis with diverting ileostomy followed by second-stage laparoscopy for ileostomy closure and direct visual assessment of the peritoneal cavity. Before abdominal closure in treated patients, Seprafilm, averaging 406.9 cm2 per patient, was applied without suturing between the midline incision and underlying tissues and organs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Determination of the incidence, extent (mean percentage of midline incision associated with adhesions), severity (grade 1, least severe; grade 2, moderately severe; grade 3, very severe), and distribution of adhesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 175 (treatment, n = 90) evaluable patients, Seprafilm significantly reduced the incidence (49% and 94%, respectively, p < 0.0001), extent (23% and 63%, respectively, p < 0.0001), and severity (15% versus 58% grade 3 severity, respectively, p < 0.0001) of postoperative adhesions. Seprafilm decreased the rate of adhesion formation by nearly 50%. More than half (51%) of Seprafilm recipients were adhesion-free, versus only 6% of untreated patients. Thus treated patients were eight times more likely to be free of adhesions than untreated controls. The incidence of incisional adhesions associated with the omentum, small bowel, left sidewall, bladder, ileostomy, and stomach was significantly reduced in the Seprafilm patients. Effects on vital signs and laboratory parameters were comparable in the two groups and were attributable to the operative procedure, concomitant therapy, or comorbid disease. All reported adverse events were associated with the surgical procedure and/or comorbid disease and did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Seprafilm is safe and significantly reduces the incidence, extent, and severity of postoperative adhesions to the midline incision compared with no treatment, the current standard of surgical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement\",\"volume\":\" 577\",\"pages\":\"49-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价化学修饰透明质酸和羧甲基纤维素的新型生物可吸收膜Seprafilm在预防和减少术后粘连形成方面的安全性和有效性。设计:随机、对照、盲法、前瞻性多中心研究。环境:主要学术外科中心。受试者:183人(治疗组,n = 91;对照组为92例溃疡性结肠炎或家族性息肉病患者。干预措施:恢复性直结肠切除术和回肠j袋吻合术联合回肠转流造口,然后二期腹腔镜进行回肠造口闭合和腹腔直接目视评估。治疗患者在闭腹前,在中线切口与下底组织器官之间不缝合应用Seprafilm膜,平均406.9 cm2 /例。主要结局指标:发生率、程度(中线切口相关粘连的平均百分比)、严重程度(1级,最不严重;二级,中度重症;3级,非常严重),粘连分布。结果:在175例(治疗,n = 90)可评估的患者中,Seprafilm显著降低了术后粘连的发生率(分别为49%和94%,p < 0.0001)、程度(分别为23%和63%,p < 0.0001)和严重程度(分别为15%和58%,p < 0.0001)。分离膜使粘附形成率降低了近50%。超过一半(51%)的seprafilum接受者无粘连,而未经治疗的患者只有6%。因此,接受治疗的患者出现粘连的可能性是未接受治疗的对照组的8倍。Seprafilm患者与网膜、小肠、左侧壁、膀胱、回肠造口和胃相关的切口粘连发生率显著降低。两组对生命体征和实验室参数的影响具有可比性,可归因于手术程序、伴随治疗或合并症。所有报告的不良事件均与手术和/或合并症相关,两组间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。结论:Seprafilm是安全的,与未治疗相比,可显著降低术后中线切口粘连的发生率、程度和严重程度,这是目前手术护理的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane in adhesion prevention.

Objective: To evaluate, the safety and efficacy of Seprafilm, a novel bioresorbable membrane of chemically modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose, in preventing and reducing postoperative adhesion formation.

Design: Randomized, controlled, blinded, prospective multicenter study.

Setting: Major academic surgical centers.

Subjects: 183 (treatment, n = 91; control, n = 92) patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis.

Interventions: Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal J-pouch anastomosis with diverting ileostomy followed by second-stage laparoscopy for ileostomy closure and direct visual assessment of the peritoneal cavity. Before abdominal closure in treated patients, Seprafilm, averaging 406.9 cm2 per patient, was applied without suturing between the midline incision and underlying tissues and organs.

Main outcome measures: Determination of the incidence, extent (mean percentage of midline incision associated with adhesions), severity (grade 1, least severe; grade 2, moderately severe; grade 3, very severe), and distribution of adhesions.

Results: In 175 (treatment, n = 90) evaluable patients, Seprafilm significantly reduced the incidence (49% and 94%, respectively, p < 0.0001), extent (23% and 63%, respectively, p < 0.0001), and severity (15% versus 58% grade 3 severity, respectively, p < 0.0001) of postoperative adhesions. Seprafilm decreased the rate of adhesion formation by nearly 50%. More than half (51%) of Seprafilm recipients were adhesion-free, versus only 6% of untreated patients. Thus treated patients were eight times more likely to be free of adhesions than untreated controls. The incidence of incisional adhesions associated with the omentum, small bowel, left sidewall, bladder, ileostomy, and stomach was significantly reduced in the Seprafilm patients. Effects on vital signs and laboratory parameters were comparable in the two groups and were attributable to the operative procedure, concomitant therapy, or comorbid disease. All reported adverse events were associated with the surgical procedure and/or comorbid disease and did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Seprafilm is safe and significantly reduces the incidence, extent, and severity of postoperative adhesions to the midline incision compared with no treatment, the current standard of surgical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信