癫痫的现代管理:合理的综合治疗。

Bailliere's clinical neurology Pub Date : 1996-12-01
D Schmidt
{"title":"癫痫的现代管理:合理的综合治疗。","authors":"D Schmidt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although monotherapy is universally accepted for treating early epilepsy, as many as 40% of patients will continue to have seizures and develop intolerable adverse effects or most commonly, both. Once initial monotherapy has failed, the physician has the choice of either polytherapy by adding a second drug or of alternative monotherapy, that is, substitution of the first drug by another agent active for the same type(s) of seizures. No large randomized comparative trials exist although smaller studies indicate that polytherapy and alternative monotherapy may both achieve complete seizure control in up to 17% and further improvement in approximately 40% of cases. Polytherapy has the advantage of providing benefit in the small minority (15%) of patients who probably cannot be treated satisfactorily by alternative monotherapy, this often being achieved at the price of additional toxicity, undesirable drug interactions and the failure to identify the action of the individual drug. The real basis for rational choice of drugs in polytherapy are features such as efficacy, lack of interaction and low intrinsic toxicity. Theoretical and experimental considerations are of limited value until we know more about the basic mechanism(s) of specific seizures and epilepsy syndromes. At present, it is recommended that undue toxicity and inconvenient drug interactions should be avoided by lowering the dosage of the first drug as much as possible before a second drug is added. In most patients alternative monotherapy, that is, complete removal of the first drug, is a safe and effective option and polytherapy remains available when alternative monotherapy fails.</p>","PeriodicalId":77030,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical neurology","volume":"5 4","pages":"757-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern management of epilepsy: Rational polytherapy.\",\"authors\":\"D Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although monotherapy is universally accepted for treating early epilepsy, as many as 40% of patients will continue to have seizures and develop intolerable adverse effects or most commonly, both. Once initial monotherapy has failed, the physician has the choice of either polytherapy by adding a second drug or of alternative monotherapy, that is, substitution of the first drug by another agent active for the same type(s) of seizures. No large randomized comparative trials exist although smaller studies indicate that polytherapy and alternative monotherapy may both achieve complete seizure control in up to 17% and further improvement in approximately 40% of cases. Polytherapy has the advantage of providing benefit in the small minority (15%) of patients who probably cannot be treated satisfactorily by alternative monotherapy, this often being achieved at the price of additional toxicity, undesirable drug interactions and the failure to identify the action of the individual drug. The real basis for rational choice of drugs in polytherapy are features such as efficacy, lack of interaction and low intrinsic toxicity. Theoretical and experimental considerations are of limited value until we know more about the basic mechanism(s) of specific seizures and epilepsy syndromes. At present, it is recommended that undue toxicity and inconvenient drug interactions should be avoided by lowering the dosage of the first drug as much as possible before a second drug is added. In most patients alternative monotherapy, that is, complete removal of the first drug, is a safe and effective option and polytherapy remains available when alternative monotherapy fails.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's clinical neurology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"757-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's clinical neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然单一疗法被普遍接受用于治疗早期癫痫,但多达40%的患者将继续发作并产生无法忍受的不良反应,或最常见的是两者兼而有之。一旦最初的单一疗法失败,医生可以选择通过添加第二种药物的综合疗法或替代单一疗法,即用另一种对同一类型癫痫发作有效的药物替代第一种药物。没有大型的随机对照试验存在,尽管较小的研究表明,复合疗法和替代单一疗法都可以在高达17%的病例中实现完全的癫痫控制,并在大约40%的病例中进一步改善。多种疗法的优势在于为少数(15%)可能无法通过替代单一疗法获得满意治疗的患者提供益处,这通常是以额外的毒性、不良的药物相互作用和无法确定单个药物的作用为代价的。综合治疗中合理选择药物的真正依据是疗效、相互作用少、内在毒性小等特点。在我们进一步了解特定发作和癫痫综合征的基本机制之前,理论和实验考虑的价值是有限的。目前,建议在添加第二种药物之前尽可能降低第一种药物的剂量,以避免过度毒性和不方便的药物相互作用。在大多数患者中,替代单一疗法,即完全去除第一种药物,是一种安全有效的选择,当替代单一疗法失败时,仍然可以使用多种疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern management of epilepsy: Rational polytherapy.

Although monotherapy is universally accepted for treating early epilepsy, as many as 40% of patients will continue to have seizures and develop intolerable adverse effects or most commonly, both. Once initial monotherapy has failed, the physician has the choice of either polytherapy by adding a second drug or of alternative monotherapy, that is, substitution of the first drug by another agent active for the same type(s) of seizures. No large randomized comparative trials exist although smaller studies indicate that polytherapy and alternative monotherapy may both achieve complete seizure control in up to 17% and further improvement in approximately 40% of cases. Polytherapy has the advantage of providing benefit in the small minority (15%) of patients who probably cannot be treated satisfactorily by alternative monotherapy, this often being achieved at the price of additional toxicity, undesirable drug interactions and the failure to identify the action of the individual drug. The real basis for rational choice of drugs in polytherapy are features such as efficacy, lack of interaction and low intrinsic toxicity. Theoretical and experimental considerations are of limited value until we know more about the basic mechanism(s) of specific seizures and epilepsy syndromes. At present, it is recommended that undue toxicity and inconvenient drug interactions should be avoided by lowering the dosage of the first drug as much as possible before a second drug is added. In most patients alternative monotherapy, that is, complete removal of the first drug, is a safe and effective option and polytherapy remains available when alternative monotherapy fails.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信