[从法律角度看精神病学的医学专家评估]。

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01

H L Schreiber

{"title":"[从法律角度看精神病学的医学专家评估]。","authors":"H L Schreiber","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subjects of psychiatric assessments do vary greatly. The main subject of criminal proceedings seems to be that of criminal responsibility. This leads to many misunderstandings. Court and expert have to use the same definitions. Criminal responsibility cannot be the deterministically interpreted freedom of will. The prevailing law does only answer insufficiently the question of selection or consultation of further experts.","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"626-30; discussion 631"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Medical expert assessment in psychiatry from the legal viewpoint].\",\"authors\":\"H L Schreiber\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subjects of psychiatric assessments do vary greatly. The main subject of criminal proceedings seems to be that of criminal responsibility. This leads to many misunderstandings. Court and expert have to use the same definitions. Criminal responsibility cannot be the deterministically interpreted freedom of will. The prevailing law does only answer insufficiently the question of selection or consultation of further experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung\",\"volume\":\"90 7\",\"pages\":\"626-30; discussion 631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

精神病学评估的对象确实差别很大。刑事诉讼的主体似乎是刑事责任问题。这导致了许多误解。法庭和专家必须使用相同的定义。刑事责任不能是意志自由的决定论解释。现行法律只是没有充分回答选择或咨询进一步专家的问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

[Medical expert assessment in psychiatry from the legal viewpoint].

The subjects of psychiatric assessments do vary greatly. The main subject of criminal proceedings seems to be that of criminal responsibility. This leads to many misunderstandings. Court and expert have to use the same definitions. Criminal responsibility cannot be the deterministically interpreted freedom of will. The prevailing law does only answer insufficiently the question of selection or consultation of further experts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung

自引率

0.00%

发文量