在皮瓣手术中应用盐酸四环素根调理的临床评价。

M Erdinç, A Efeoglu, K Demirel
{"title":"在皮瓣手术中应用盐酸四环素根调理的临床评价。","authors":"M Erdinç,&nbsp;A Efeoglu,&nbsp;K Demirel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical effects of root surface demineralization during flap surgery were evaluated in ten patients with rapidly progressive periodontitis. Following initial periodontal therapy, flap surgery was conducted on the anterior segments. Test sites received conditioning with tetracycline solution for 5 minutes, whereas control sites were only rinsed with sterile saline solution. Following either treatment, improvement was observed on all clinical measures. However, apart from gingival index assessments, there was not a statistically significant difference in the improvement observed between test and control groups; the only significant difference was observed in gingival index scores at the second and fourth weeks. These differences in gingival index, which are not reflected in plaque index scores, imply that tetracycline has been absorbed on root surfaces and released in biologically active form for up to 4 weeks; but attachment level measurements demonstrate that tetracycline conditioning of the root surfaces during flap surgery has no additional regenerative benefit, or at least none detectable by clinical means.</p>","PeriodicalId":77319,"journal":{"name":"Periodontal clinical investigations : official publication of the Northeastern Society of Periodontists","volume":"17 1","pages":"6-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of the effect of tetracycline hydrochloride root conditioning during flap surgery.\",\"authors\":\"M Erdinç,&nbsp;A Efeoglu,&nbsp;K Demirel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical effects of root surface demineralization during flap surgery were evaluated in ten patients with rapidly progressive periodontitis. Following initial periodontal therapy, flap surgery was conducted on the anterior segments. Test sites received conditioning with tetracycline solution for 5 minutes, whereas control sites were only rinsed with sterile saline solution. Following either treatment, improvement was observed on all clinical measures. However, apart from gingival index assessments, there was not a statistically significant difference in the improvement observed between test and control groups; the only significant difference was observed in gingival index scores at the second and fourth weeks. These differences in gingival index, which are not reflected in plaque index scores, imply that tetracycline has been absorbed on root surfaces and released in biologically active form for up to 4 weeks; but attachment level measurements demonstrate that tetracycline conditioning of the root surfaces during flap surgery has no additional regenerative benefit, or at least none detectable by clinical means.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodontal clinical investigations : official publication of the Northeastern Society of Periodontists\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"6-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodontal clinical investigations : official publication of the Northeastern Society of Periodontists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodontal clinical investigations : official publication of the Northeastern Society of Periodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对10例快速进展性牙周炎患者进行牙根表面脱矿手术。在最初的牙周治疗后,在前段进行皮瓣手术。测试部位用四环素溶液调理5分钟,而对照部位只用无菌盐水溶液冲洗。两种治疗后,所有临床指标均有改善。然而,除了牙龈指数评估外,实验组和对照组之间的改善无统计学差异;第2周和第4周牙龈指数评分有显著差异。牙龈指数的这些差异并没有反映在菌斑指数评分上,这意味着四环素已经在牙根表面被吸收并以生物活性形式释放了长达4周;但是附着水平测量表明,在皮瓣手术期间,四环素对根表面的调节没有额外的再生益处,或者至少没有通过临床手段检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical evaluation of the effect of tetracycline hydrochloride root conditioning during flap surgery.

Clinical effects of root surface demineralization during flap surgery were evaluated in ten patients with rapidly progressive periodontitis. Following initial periodontal therapy, flap surgery was conducted on the anterior segments. Test sites received conditioning with tetracycline solution for 5 minutes, whereas control sites were only rinsed with sterile saline solution. Following either treatment, improvement was observed on all clinical measures. However, apart from gingival index assessments, there was not a statistically significant difference in the improvement observed between test and control groups; the only significant difference was observed in gingival index scores at the second and fourth weeks. These differences in gingival index, which are not reflected in plaque index scores, imply that tetracycline has been absorbed on root surfaces and released in biologically active form for up to 4 weeks; but attachment level measurements demonstrate that tetracycline conditioning of the root surfaces during flap surgery has no additional regenerative benefit, or at least none detectable by clinical means.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信