PAPNET法与常规镜检宫颈细胞学检查的比较。

D Weissbrod, M Torres, A Rodríguez, I Ureña, J Estrada, M E Reyes, A J Carreto
{"title":"PAPNET法与常规镜检宫颈细胞学检查的比较。","authors":"D Weissbrod,&nbsp;M Torres,&nbsp;A Rodríguez,&nbsp;I Ureña,&nbsp;J Estrada,&nbsp;M E Reyes,&nbsp;A J Carreto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From August 1994 to June 1995, laboratories in 28 Mexican states and the Federal District submitted a total of 10098 diagnosed Pap test slides to Mexico's National Institute of Epidemiologic Diagnosis and Reference (INDRE) for reexamination by conventional methods and also by the automated PAPNET system in Suffern, New York, U.S.A. The aim was to determine the degree of agreement obtained by these various methods. Most of the slides examined (at least 78%) yielded negative results or merely indicated an inflammatory process; 8% to 14% indicated mild or moderate cervical dysplasia; and 2% to 3% indicated conditions ranging from severe dysplasia to invasive cervical cancer. Comparison of the state laboratory and INDRE diagnoses yielded a Kappa correlation coefficient of 0.62, near the lower limit of agreement, the agreement being poorest in cases where it was necessary to distinguish between degrees of abnormality. Although state laboratory underestimation appeared lowest with respect to cases of atypia and of mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia (between 12% and 20%), these percentages are alarming because it is at these stages that the patient may be treated to prevent evolution to carcinoma. While the Kappa correlation coefficient was better (0.80) when the INDRE and PAPNET diagnoses were compared, PAPNET showed only limited ability to distinguish between various pathologic alterations, and the percentages of underestimates (false negatives) obtained with PAPNET were also high. Overall, the results indicate a need to improve the quality of cervical cytology diagnoses at state public health laboratories in Mexico through stepped-up training and supervision. They also indicate that the use of PAPNET involves greater difficulty than does manual microscopic examination of cervical smears, and that a way still needs to be found to detect and review the false negative results generated by PAPNET before approving use of this technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":75654,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization","volume":"30 4","pages":"339-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.\",\"authors\":\"D Weissbrod,&nbsp;M Torres,&nbsp;A Rodríguez,&nbsp;I Ureña,&nbsp;J Estrada,&nbsp;M E Reyes,&nbsp;A J Carreto\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>From August 1994 to June 1995, laboratories in 28 Mexican states and the Federal District submitted a total of 10098 diagnosed Pap test slides to Mexico's National Institute of Epidemiologic Diagnosis and Reference (INDRE) for reexamination by conventional methods and also by the automated PAPNET system in Suffern, New York, U.S.A. The aim was to determine the degree of agreement obtained by these various methods. Most of the slides examined (at least 78%) yielded negative results or merely indicated an inflammatory process; 8% to 14% indicated mild or moderate cervical dysplasia; and 2% to 3% indicated conditions ranging from severe dysplasia to invasive cervical cancer. Comparison of the state laboratory and INDRE diagnoses yielded a Kappa correlation coefficient of 0.62, near the lower limit of agreement, the agreement being poorest in cases where it was necessary to distinguish between degrees of abnormality. Although state laboratory underestimation appeared lowest with respect to cases of atypia and of mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia (between 12% and 20%), these percentages are alarming because it is at these stages that the patient may be treated to prevent evolution to carcinoma. While the Kappa correlation coefficient was better (0.80) when the INDRE and PAPNET diagnoses were compared, PAPNET showed only limited ability to distinguish between various pathologic alterations, and the percentages of underestimates (false negatives) obtained with PAPNET were also high. Overall, the results indicate a need to improve the quality of cervical cytology diagnoses at state public health laboratories in Mexico through stepped-up training and supervision. They also indicate that the use of PAPNET involves greater difficulty than does manual microscopic examination of cervical smears, and that a way still needs to be found to detect and review the false negative results generated by PAPNET before approving use of this technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"339-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1994年8月至1995年6月,墨西哥28个州和联邦区的实验室共向墨西哥国家流行病学诊断和参考研究所(INDRE)提交了10098份确诊的巴氏试验载片,以便用常规方法和美国纽约萨芬市的自动PAPNET系统进行复查,目的是确定这些不同方法获得的一致性程度。大多数玻片检查(至少78%)结果为阴性或仅显示炎症过程;8%至14%为轻度或中度宫颈发育不良;2%到3%的人患有从严重发育不良到浸润性宫颈癌的疾病。国家实验室和INDRE诊断的比较得出Kappa相关系数为0.62,接近一致性的下限,在需要区分异常程度的情况下,一致性最差。尽管国家实验室对异型和轻度、中度和重度发育不良的低估最低(在12%至20%之间),但这些百分比令人担忧,因为正是在这些阶段,患者可能需要治疗以防止演变为癌症。当比较INDRE和PAPNET诊断时,Kappa相关系数更好(0.80),但PAPNET仅显示有限的区分各种病理改变的能力,并且PAPNET获得的低估(假阴性)百分比也很高。总的来说,结果表明需要通过加强培训和监督来提高墨西哥国家公共卫生实验室宫颈细胞学诊断的质量。他们还指出,使用PAPNET比手工宫颈涂片显微镜检查更困难,并且在批准使用该技术之前,仍需要找到一种方法来检测和审查PAPNET产生的假阴性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.

From August 1994 to June 1995, laboratories in 28 Mexican states and the Federal District submitted a total of 10098 diagnosed Pap test slides to Mexico's National Institute of Epidemiologic Diagnosis and Reference (INDRE) for reexamination by conventional methods and also by the automated PAPNET system in Suffern, New York, U.S.A. The aim was to determine the degree of agreement obtained by these various methods. Most of the slides examined (at least 78%) yielded negative results or merely indicated an inflammatory process; 8% to 14% indicated mild or moderate cervical dysplasia; and 2% to 3% indicated conditions ranging from severe dysplasia to invasive cervical cancer. Comparison of the state laboratory and INDRE diagnoses yielded a Kappa correlation coefficient of 0.62, near the lower limit of agreement, the agreement being poorest in cases where it was necessary to distinguish between degrees of abnormality. Although state laboratory underestimation appeared lowest with respect to cases of atypia and of mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia (between 12% and 20%), these percentages are alarming because it is at these stages that the patient may be treated to prevent evolution to carcinoma. While the Kappa correlation coefficient was better (0.80) when the INDRE and PAPNET diagnoses were compared, PAPNET showed only limited ability to distinguish between various pathologic alterations, and the percentages of underestimates (false negatives) obtained with PAPNET were also high. Overall, the results indicate a need to improve the quality of cervical cytology diagnoses at state public health laboratories in Mexico through stepped-up training and supervision. They also indicate that the use of PAPNET involves greater difficulty than does manual microscopic examination of cervical smears, and that a way still needs to be found to detect and review the false negative results generated by PAPNET before approving use of this technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信