[3种麻醉方法对小儿手术应激的保护作用]。

Cahiers d'anesthesiologie Pub Date : 1996-01-01
G Ivani, M Vaira, S Fossa, G Mattioli, V Jasonni, P E Caffarena, E Podestà, E Parodi, L Rossi
{"title":"[3种麻醉方法对小儿手术应激的保护作用]。","authors":"G Ivani,&nbsp;M Vaira,&nbsp;S Fossa,&nbsp;G Mattioli,&nbsp;V Jasonni,&nbsp;P E Caffarena,&nbsp;E Podestà,&nbsp;E Parodi,&nbsp;L Rossi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hormonal-metabolic stress responses have beyond doubt an effect on morbidity/mortality related to surgery. The present study med to determine which anaesthetic technique could afford the best protection in children, through analysis of the perioperative cortisol, prolactin and beta-endorphin plasma levels. Thirty-six young patients 3-10 years old, ASA I-II, scheduled for hypospadias or vesicoureteral reflux surgery of a duration > 60 min, were randomized into three groups (n = 12). Children of group I were given initially propofol and fentanyl then isoflurane 1%; group 2 received TIVA with propofol and fentanyl, group 3 received initially propofol then an epidural lumbar block with bupivacaine 0.25% (single shot) and continuous propofol i.v. infusion. Cortisol, prolactin and beta-endorphin levels increased significantly in group 1 only. No significant differences were observed between group 2 and 3. Early postoperative analgesia was better in group 3. These data suggest that TIVA and particularly epidural block could afford a better protection against the surgical stress in children submitted to subumbilical operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":77055,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie","volume":"44 4","pages":"297-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Protective efficacy of 3 anesthetic methods with reference to surgical stress in children].\",\"authors\":\"G Ivani,&nbsp;M Vaira,&nbsp;S Fossa,&nbsp;G Mattioli,&nbsp;V Jasonni,&nbsp;P E Caffarena,&nbsp;E Podestà,&nbsp;E Parodi,&nbsp;L Rossi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hormonal-metabolic stress responses have beyond doubt an effect on morbidity/mortality related to surgery. The present study med to determine which anaesthetic technique could afford the best protection in children, through analysis of the perioperative cortisol, prolactin and beta-endorphin plasma levels. Thirty-six young patients 3-10 years old, ASA I-II, scheduled for hypospadias or vesicoureteral reflux surgery of a duration > 60 min, were randomized into three groups (n = 12). Children of group I were given initially propofol and fentanyl then isoflurane 1%; group 2 received TIVA with propofol and fentanyl, group 3 received initially propofol then an epidural lumbar block with bupivacaine 0.25% (single shot) and continuous propofol i.v. infusion. Cortisol, prolactin and beta-endorphin levels increased significantly in group 1 only. No significant differences were observed between group 2 and 3. Early postoperative analgesia was better in group 3. These data suggest that TIVA and particularly epidural block could afford a better protection against the surgical stress in children submitted to subumbilical operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"297-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激素代谢应激反应无疑对手术相关的发病率/死亡率有影响。本研究旨在通过分析围术期皮质醇、催乳素和β -内啡肽的血浆水平,确定哪种麻醉技术可以提供最好的保护儿童。36例年龄3-10岁,ASA I-II,计划行尿道下裂或膀胱输尿管反流手术,手术时间> 60分钟的年轻患者随机分为三组(n = 12)。I组患儿先给予异丙酚和芬太尼,再给予1%异氟醚;2组采用异丙酚+芬太尼的TIVA, 3组先应用异丙酚,后应用0.25%布比卡因硬膜外腰椎阻滞(单次注射),持续静脉输注异丙酚。皮质醇、催乳素和-内啡肽水平仅在第1组显著升高。2组与3组间无显著差异。3组术后早期镇痛效果较好。这些数据表明,TIVA,特别是硬膜外阻滞可以更好地保护接受脐下手术的儿童免受手术压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Protective efficacy of 3 anesthetic methods with reference to surgical stress in children].

Hormonal-metabolic stress responses have beyond doubt an effect on morbidity/mortality related to surgery. The present study med to determine which anaesthetic technique could afford the best protection in children, through analysis of the perioperative cortisol, prolactin and beta-endorphin plasma levels. Thirty-six young patients 3-10 years old, ASA I-II, scheduled for hypospadias or vesicoureteral reflux surgery of a duration > 60 min, were randomized into three groups (n = 12). Children of group I were given initially propofol and fentanyl then isoflurane 1%; group 2 received TIVA with propofol and fentanyl, group 3 received initially propofol then an epidural lumbar block with bupivacaine 0.25% (single shot) and continuous propofol i.v. infusion. Cortisol, prolactin and beta-endorphin levels increased significantly in group 1 only. No significant differences were observed between group 2 and 3. Early postoperative analgesia was better in group 3. These data suggest that TIVA and particularly epidural block could afford a better protection against the surgical stress in children submitted to subumbilical operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信