从RAPD数据计算遗传相似系数:PCR伪影的影响。

W F Lamboy
{"title":"从RAPD数据计算遗传相似系数:PCR伪影的影响。","authors":"W F Lamboy","doi":"10.1101/gr.4.1.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers have been used for many types of genetic analyses, including genome mapping, genotype fingerprinting, phylogeny reconstruction, and measuring genetic similarities. They suffer from one potential limitation, however, because the PCR that is used to produce informative amplification products often produces artifactual products as well. Optimization of PCR protocols to eliminate artifactual bands completely is often too costly or too time-consuming to be practical. Other methods for handling RAPD artifacts, such as deleting inconsistent or faint bands or using only those bands that are reproducible, introduce false negatives into the data. Simply ignoring artifacts and using all bands introduces false positives. When RAPD data are used to compute genetic similarity coefficients, such artifacts can cause significant bias in the estimation. The three coefficients most widely used with RAPD data, the simple matching coefficient, Jaccard's coefficient and Nei and Li's coefficient, differ in the amount of bias produced by a given level of artifactual bands. The simple matching coefficient and Nei and Li's coefficient always exhibit less percent bias than Jaccard's coefficient. For closely related organisms, Nei and Li's coefficient displays less percent bias than the simple matching coefficient. If new DNA samples possessing RAPD markers not present in the previously analyzed samples are added to a study, values of the simple matching coefficient will need to be computed for all samples, not just the new ones. Jaccard's and Nei and Li's coefficients, however, will not need to be recomputed. Furthermore, only Nei and Li's coefficient has a direct biological meaning (it is an estimate of the expected proportion of amplified fragments shared by two samples because they were inherited from a common ancestor). On the basis of these results, Nei and Li's coefficient is recommended for routine computation of genetic similarities using RAPD data, particularly if PCR artifacts are present.</p>","PeriodicalId":77315,"journal":{"name":"PCR methods and applications","volume":"4 1","pages":"31-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1101/gr.4.1.31","citationCount":"124","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computing genetic similarity coefficients from RAPD data: the effects of PCR artifacts.\",\"authors\":\"W F Lamboy\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/gr.4.1.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers have been used for many types of genetic analyses, including genome mapping, genotype fingerprinting, phylogeny reconstruction, and measuring genetic similarities. They suffer from one potential limitation, however, because the PCR that is used to produce informative amplification products often produces artifactual products as well. Optimization of PCR protocols to eliminate artifactual bands completely is often too costly or too time-consuming to be practical. Other methods for handling RAPD artifacts, such as deleting inconsistent or faint bands or using only those bands that are reproducible, introduce false negatives into the data. Simply ignoring artifacts and using all bands introduces false positives. When RAPD data are used to compute genetic similarity coefficients, such artifacts can cause significant bias in the estimation. The three coefficients most widely used with RAPD data, the simple matching coefficient, Jaccard's coefficient and Nei and Li's coefficient, differ in the amount of bias produced by a given level of artifactual bands. The simple matching coefficient and Nei and Li's coefficient always exhibit less percent bias than Jaccard's coefficient. For closely related organisms, Nei and Li's coefficient displays less percent bias than the simple matching coefficient. If new DNA samples possessing RAPD markers not present in the previously analyzed samples are added to a study, values of the simple matching coefficient will need to be computed for all samples, not just the new ones. Jaccard's and Nei and Li's coefficients, however, will not need to be recomputed. Furthermore, only Nei and Li's coefficient has a direct biological meaning (it is an estimate of the expected proportion of amplified fragments shared by two samples because they were inherited from a common ancestor). On the basis of these results, Nei and Li's coefficient is recommended for routine computation of genetic similarities using RAPD data, particularly if PCR artifacts are present.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PCR methods and applications\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"31-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1101/gr.4.1.31\",\"citationCount\":\"124\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PCR methods and applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4.1.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCR methods and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4.1.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 124

摘要

随机扩增多态性DNA (RAPD)标记已被用于多种类型的遗传分析,包括基因组定位、基因型指纹、系统发育重建和遗传相似性测量。然而,它们有一个潜在的限制,因为用于产生信息扩增产物的PCR通常也会产生人工产物。优化PCR方案以完全消除人工条带通常太昂贵或太耗时而不切实际。其他处理RAPD伪影的方法,比如删除不一致的或微弱的带,或者只使用那些可重复的带,会在数据中引入假阴性。简单地忽略伪影并使用所有波段会导致误报。当RAPD数据被用来计算遗传相似系数时,这些伪影会在估计中引起显著的偏差。RAPD数据最广泛使用的三个系数,简单匹配系数,Jaccard系数和Nei和Li系数,在给定水平的人工波段产生的偏差量上有所不同。简单匹配系数和Nei和Li系数总是比Jaccard系数表现出更小的百分比偏差。对于近亲生物,Nei和Li的系数比简单的匹配系数显示出更小的百分比偏差。如果在先前分析的样本中没有RAPD标记的新DNA样本被添加到研究中,则需要计算所有样本的简单匹配系数值,而不仅仅是新样本。然而,Jaccard系数、Nei系数和Li系数不需要重新计算。此外,只有Nei和Li的系数具有直接的生物学意义(它是对两个样本共享的扩增片段的预期比例的估计,因为它们是从一个共同的祖先遗传的)。在这些结果的基础上,推荐使用Nei和Li系数来使用RAPD数据进行遗传相似性的常规计算,特别是如果存在PCR伪影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computing genetic similarity coefficients from RAPD data: the effects of PCR artifacts.

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers have been used for many types of genetic analyses, including genome mapping, genotype fingerprinting, phylogeny reconstruction, and measuring genetic similarities. They suffer from one potential limitation, however, because the PCR that is used to produce informative amplification products often produces artifactual products as well. Optimization of PCR protocols to eliminate artifactual bands completely is often too costly or too time-consuming to be practical. Other methods for handling RAPD artifacts, such as deleting inconsistent or faint bands or using only those bands that are reproducible, introduce false negatives into the data. Simply ignoring artifacts and using all bands introduces false positives. When RAPD data are used to compute genetic similarity coefficients, such artifacts can cause significant bias in the estimation. The three coefficients most widely used with RAPD data, the simple matching coefficient, Jaccard's coefficient and Nei and Li's coefficient, differ in the amount of bias produced by a given level of artifactual bands. The simple matching coefficient and Nei and Li's coefficient always exhibit less percent bias than Jaccard's coefficient. For closely related organisms, Nei and Li's coefficient displays less percent bias than the simple matching coefficient. If new DNA samples possessing RAPD markers not present in the previously analyzed samples are added to a study, values of the simple matching coefficient will need to be computed for all samples, not just the new ones. Jaccard's and Nei and Li's coefficients, however, will not need to be recomputed. Furthermore, only Nei and Li's coefficient has a direct biological meaning (it is an estimate of the expected proportion of amplified fragments shared by two samples because they were inherited from a common ancestor). On the basis of these results, Nei and Li's coefficient is recommended for routine computation of genetic similarities using RAPD data, particularly if PCR artifacts are present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信