[排除献血者、丢弃的血液和输血不合适的血液,1991年至1994年的2,13万潜在献血者]。

U Diekamp, W Wehrend, E Marklof, K Kamutzky
{"title":"[排除献血者、丢弃的血液和输血不合适的血液,1991年至1994年的2,13万潜在献血者]。","authors":"U Diekamp,&nbsp;W Wehrend,&nbsp;E Marklof,&nbsp;K Kamutzky","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>German authorities plan to legislate transfusion safety. We report on the efficacy of donor selection, unit pre-release testing, quality assurance and look-back efforts (LBE): Among 2,127,102 visits by 503,971 donors are 8.7% first-time donors. 96% of repeaters present our donor ID-card. We defer 5.6% repeat and 18.2% first-time donors, mostly for their own safety. 0.5% of the donors suffer a reaction. 94,000 units (4.7%) are not released due to confidential self-exclusion (1.1%), quality and safety concerns (1.7%), and positive screening tests (1.9%). Only 5.2% positive infectious disease screening tests were confirmed. HIV-prevalence of first-time donors is 0.002%; the HIV seroconversion rate for second-time donors is 0.003%. All other seroconversion rates for HBV, HCV, HIV and lues at subsequent donations are 0.001%. 23 donor-related LBE did not reveal a single HIV-infected recipient. In 106 recipient-related LBE involving 868 donors, we found 5 seroconverted donors (1 HBV, 3 HCV, 1 HIV).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our repeat donors present proper ID. Strict donor selection criteria result in many rejections. Donor reactions are rare. High demands on blood safety and quality result in many discards. In our hands, confidential unit exclusion does not add safety. The HIV prevalence of first-time and repeat donors is equally low. Donor seroconversions are rare. LBE rarely identify infected donors or recipients. Our current high transfusion safety is unlikely to be improved through legislative measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":79439,"journal":{"name":"Beitrage zur Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin = Contributions to infusion therapy and transfusion medicine","volume":"33 ","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Donor exclusions, discarded blood and transfusion unsuited blood conserves of 2,13 million potential blood donors 1991 to 1994].\",\"authors\":\"U Diekamp,&nbsp;W Wehrend,&nbsp;E Marklof,&nbsp;K Kamutzky\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>German authorities plan to legislate transfusion safety. We report on the efficacy of donor selection, unit pre-release testing, quality assurance and look-back efforts (LBE): Among 2,127,102 visits by 503,971 donors are 8.7% first-time donors. 96% of repeaters present our donor ID-card. We defer 5.6% repeat and 18.2% first-time donors, mostly for their own safety. 0.5% of the donors suffer a reaction. 94,000 units (4.7%) are not released due to confidential self-exclusion (1.1%), quality and safety concerns (1.7%), and positive screening tests (1.9%). Only 5.2% positive infectious disease screening tests were confirmed. HIV-prevalence of first-time donors is 0.002%; the HIV seroconversion rate for second-time donors is 0.003%. All other seroconversion rates for HBV, HCV, HIV and lues at subsequent donations are 0.001%. 23 donor-related LBE did not reveal a single HIV-infected recipient. In 106 recipient-related LBE involving 868 donors, we found 5 seroconverted donors (1 HBV, 3 HCV, 1 HIV).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our repeat donors present proper ID. Strict donor selection criteria result in many rejections. Donor reactions are rare. High demands on blood safety and quality result in many discards. In our hands, confidential unit exclusion does not add safety. The HIV prevalence of first-time and repeat donors is equally low. Donor seroconversions are rare. LBE rarely identify infected donors or recipients. Our current high transfusion safety is unlikely to be improved through legislative measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beitrage zur Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin = Contributions to infusion therapy and transfusion medicine\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"81-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beitrage zur Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin = Contributions to infusion therapy and transfusion medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beitrage zur Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin = Contributions to infusion therapy and transfusion medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未标记:德国当局计划立法输血安全。我们报告了献血者选择、单位预放行测试、质量保证和回顾工作(LBE)的有效性:在503,971名献血者的2,127,102次就诊中,8.7%是首次献血者。96%的重复者出示了我们的供体身份证。我们推迟了5.6%的重复捐赠和18.2%的首次捐赠,主要是为了自身安全。0.5%的捐献者会出现反应。94,000个单位(4.7%)由于保密的自我排除(1.1%),质量和安全问题(1.7%)以及阳性筛选测试(1.9%)而未发布。仅有5.2%的传染病筛查试验呈阳性。首次献血者的艾滋病毒感染率为0.002%;第二次献血者的艾滋病毒血清转换率为0.003%。在随后的捐献中,HBV、HCV、HIV和lues的所有其他血清转换率为0.001%。23例与供体相关的LBE未发现单个受艾滋病毒感染的受体。在106例涉及868名供者的受体相关LBE中,我们发现5例血清转化供者(1例HBV, 3例HCV, 1例HIV)。结论:我们的重复献血者出示了正确的身份证。严格的供体选择标准导致许多排斥。供体反应很少见。对血液安全和质量的高要求导致了大量的丢弃。在我们手中,保密单位排除不增加安全。首次和多次献血者的艾滋病毒感染率同样低。供体血清转换是罕见的。LBE很少识别受感染的供体或受体。我国目前输血安全性高,不太可能通过立法措施得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Donor exclusions, discarded blood and transfusion unsuited blood conserves of 2,13 million potential blood donors 1991 to 1994].

Unlabelled: German authorities plan to legislate transfusion safety. We report on the efficacy of donor selection, unit pre-release testing, quality assurance and look-back efforts (LBE): Among 2,127,102 visits by 503,971 donors are 8.7% first-time donors. 96% of repeaters present our donor ID-card. We defer 5.6% repeat and 18.2% first-time donors, mostly for their own safety. 0.5% of the donors suffer a reaction. 94,000 units (4.7%) are not released due to confidential self-exclusion (1.1%), quality and safety concerns (1.7%), and positive screening tests (1.9%). Only 5.2% positive infectious disease screening tests were confirmed. HIV-prevalence of first-time donors is 0.002%; the HIV seroconversion rate for second-time donors is 0.003%. All other seroconversion rates for HBV, HCV, HIV and lues at subsequent donations are 0.001%. 23 donor-related LBE did not reveal a single HIV-infected recipient. In 106 recipient-related LBE involving 868 donors, we found 5 seroconverted donors (1 HBV, 3 HCV, 1 HIV).

Conclusions: Our repeat donors present proper ID. Strict donor selection criteria result in many rejections. Donor reactions are rare. High demands on blood safety and quality result in many discards. In our hands, confidential unit exclusion does not add safety. The HIV prevalence of first-time and repeat donors is equally low. Donor seroconversions are rare. LBE rarely identify infected donors or recipients. Our current high transfusion safety is unlikely to be improved through legislative measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信