腹部手术感染的抗生素治疗时间。最小限度的抗生素治疗:技术评估代替临床试验。

A Lechleuthner, H Troidl, R Lefering
{"title":"腹部手术感染的抗生素治疗时间。最小限度的抗生素治疗:技术评估代替临床试验。","authors":"A Lechleuthner,&nbsp;H Troidl,&nbsp;R Lefering","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In modern medicine which already uses maximal resources, additional improvements involve huge extra efforts. With increasing complexity of diseases, specific treatments have only a limited influence on the \"whole process\". In complex clinical situations (including sepsis and SIRS) the available methodology to identify groups of patients who may benefit from a specific treatment are weak. This is why prospective randomised \"megatrials\" may be needed to detect small differences in outcome. We suggest that careful prospective assessment of cohorts of well stratified patients, subjected to a specific and standardised treatment, may replace prospective controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":77418,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement","volume":" 576","pages":"36-7; discussion 37-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duration of antibiotic treatment in surgical infections of the abdomen. Minimal antibiotic therapy: technology assessment instead of clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"A Lechleuthner,&nbsp;H Troidl,&nbsp;R Lefering\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In modern medicine which already uses maximal resources, additional improvements involve huge extra efforts. With increasing complexity of diseases, specific treatments have only a limited influence on the \\\"whole process\\\". In complex clinical situations (including sepsis and SIRS) the available methodology to identify groups of patients who may benefit from a specific treatment are weak. This is why prospective randomised \\\"megatrials\\\" may be needed to detect small differences in outcome. We suggest that careful prospective assessment of cohorts of well stratified patients, subjected to a specific and standardised treatment, may replace prospective controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement\",\"volume\":\" 576\",\"pages\":\"36-7; discussion 37-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在已经消耗了最大资源的现代医学中,额外的改进需要付出巨大的额外努力。随着疾病的日益复杂,特定治疗对“整个过程”的影响有限。在复杂的临床情况下(包括脓毒症和SIRS),确定可能从特定治疗中受益的患者群体的现有方法很薄弱。这就是为什么可能需要前瞻性随机“大材料”来检测结果的微小差异。我们建议对分层良好的患者队列进行仔细的前瞻性评估,接受特定和标准化的治疗,可以取代前瞻性对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Duration of antibiotic treatment in surgical infections of the abdomen. Minimal antibiotic therapy: technology assessment instead of clinical trials.

In modern medicine which already uses maximal resources, additional improvements involve huge extra efforts. With increasing complexity of diseases, specific treatments have only a limited influence on the "whole process". In complex clinical situations (including sepsis and SIRS) the available methodology to identify groups of patients who may benefit from a specific treatment are weak. This is why prospective randomised "megatrials" may be needed to detect small differences in outcome. We suggest that careful prospective assessment of cohorts of well stratified patients, subjected to a specific and standardised treatment, may replace prospective controlled trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信