遗传毒理学风险评估的未来方法

Rosalie K. Elespuru
{"title":"遗传毒理学风险评估的未来方法","authors":"Rosalie K. Elespuru","doi":"10.1016/S0165-1110(96)90021-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Short-term genetic toxicology tests were developed for the purpose of identifying chemical carcinogens in the environment. After two decades of development and validation, the tests are well-established in routine testing schemes, but our views of their utility for safety evaluation have undergone re-assessment. The correlation between identified mutagens and identified carcinogens has turned out to be significantly less than one. Processes or mechanisms that are not directly genotoxic appear to play a role in carcinogenesis. While short term test data are still components of the assessment of carcinogenic risk, genetic damage also has been recognized as important in its own right, in relation to heritable genetic risk and other health-related effects, such as aging, reproductive failure and developmental toxicity. The revolution in molecular biology and genetic analysis occurring over the past 20 years has contributed to the wealth of new information on the complexities of cell regulation, differentiation, and the carcinogenic process. These technologies have provided new experimental approaches to genetic toxicology assessments, including transgenic cell and animal models, human monitoring, and analysis of macromolecular interactions at environmentally relevant exposures. The potential exists for the development of more efficient and more relevant genetic toxicology testing schemes for use assessing human safety. A delineation of contemporary needs, a modern view of the elements of cancer induction, and an examination of new assays and technologies may provide a framework for integrating new approaches into current schemes for evaluating the potential genetic and carcinogenic risk of environmental chemicals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100940,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-1110(96)90021-4","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future approaches to genetic toxicology risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"Rosalie K. Elespuru\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0165-1110(96)90021-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Short-term genetic toxicology tests were developed for the purpose of identifying chemical carcinogens in the environment. After two decades of development and validation, the tests are well-established in routine testing schemes, but our views of their utility for safety evaluation have undergone re-assessment. The correlation between identified mutagens and identified carcinogens has turned out to be significantly less than one. Processes or mechanisms that are not directly genotoxic appear to play a role in carcinogenesis. While short term test data are still components of the assessment of carcinogenic risk, genetic damage also has been recognized as important in its own right, in relation to heritable genetic risk and other health-related effects, such as aging, reproductive failure and developmental toxicity. The revolution in molecular biology and genetic analysis occurring over the past 20 years has contributed to the wealth of new information on the complexities of cell regulation, differentiation, and the carcinogenic process. These technologies have provided new experimental approaches to genetic toxicology assessments, including transgenic cell and animal models, human monitoring, and analysis of macromolecular interactions at environmentally relevant exposures. The potential exists for the development of more efficient and more relevant genetic toxicology testing schemes for use assessing human safety. A delineation of contemporary needs, a modern view of the elements of cancer induction, and an examination of new assays and technologies may provide a framework for integrating new approaches into current schemes for evaluating the potential genetic and carcinogenic risk of environmental chemicals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-1110(96)90021-4\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165111096900214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165111096900214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

开发了短期遗传毒理学试验,目的是确定环境中的化学致癌物。经过二十年的发展和验证,这些测试在常规测试方案中得到了完善,但我们对其用于安全性评估的实用性的看法经历了重新评估。已确定的诱变剂和已确定的致癌物之间的相关性已被证明明显小于1。没有直接遗传毒性的过程或机制似乎在癌变中起作用。虽然短期试验数据仍是评估致癌风险的组成部分,但就遗传风险和其他与健康有关的影响(如衰老、生殖失败和发育毒性)而言,遗传损害本身也已被认为是重要的。在过去的20年里,分子生物学和遗传分析的革命为细胞调控、分化和致癌过程的复杂性提供了丰富的新信息。这些技术为遗传毒理学评估提供了新的实验方法,包括转基因细胞和动物模型、人体监测和环境相关暴露下大分子相互作用的分析。有可能制定更有效和更相关的遗传毒理学测试方案,以用于评估人类安全。对当代需求的描述,对癌症诱发因素的现代观点,以及对新分析方法和新技术的审查,可能提供一个框架,以便将新方法纳入评估环境化学品潜在遗传和致癌风险的现行计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Future approaches to genetic toxicology risk assessment

Short-term genetic toxicology tests were developed for the purpose of identifying chemical carcinogens in the environment. After two decades of development and validation, the tests are well-established in routine testing schemes, but our views of their utility for safety evaluation have undergone re-assessment. The correlation between identified mutagens and identified carcinogens has turned out to be significantly less than one. Processes or mechanisms that are not directly genotoxic appear to play a role in carcinogenesis. While short term test data are still components of the assessment of carcinogenic risk, genetic damage also has been recognized as important in its own right, in relation to heritable genetic risk and other health-related effects, such as aging, reproductive failure and developmental toxicity. The revolution in molecular biology and genetic analysis occurring over the past 20 years has contributed to the wealth of new information on the complexities of cell regulation, differentiation, and the carcinogenic process. These technologies have provided new experimental approaches to genetic toxicology assessments, including transgenic cell and animal models, human monitoring, and analysis of macromolecular interactions at environmentally relevant exposures. The potential exists for the development of more efficient and more relevant genetic toxicology testing schemes for use assessing human safety. A delineation of contemporary needs, a modern view of the elements of cancer induction, and an examination of new assays and technologies may provide a framework for integrating new approaches into current schemes for evaluating the potential genetic and carcinogenic risk of environmental chemicals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信