左舒必利治疗功能性消化不良:一项多中心、双盲、对照试验。

G R Corazza, F Biagi, O Albano, G Bianchi Porro, R Cheli, G Mazzacca, F Miglio, R Naccarato, D Quaglino, C Surrenti, G Verme, G Gasbarrini
{"title":"左舒必利治疗功能性消化不良:一项多中心、双盲、对照试验。","authors":"G R Corazza,&nbsp;F Biagi,&nbsp;O Albano,&nbsp;G Bianchi Porro,&nbsp;R Cheli,&nbsp;G Mazzacca,&nbsp;F Miglio,&nbsp;R Naccarato,&nbsp;D Quaglino,&nbsp;C Surrenti,&nbsp;G Verme,&nbsp;G Gasbarrini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abnormalities in gastrointestinal motility have been reported in a substantial proportion of patients with functional dyspepsia, supporting the use of prokinetic drugs for treatment of dyspeptic symptoms. To evaluate efficacy and safety of levosulpiride in short-term treatment, 1298 patients were enrolled in a double-blind multicentric study carried out in 45 Italian Gastroenterology Departments. Patients were randomly assigned to either levosulpiride (25 mg tid), domperidone (10 mg tid), metoclopramide (10 mg tid) or placebo (1 tablet tid) for 4 weeks. Patients were selected on the basis of: a) occurrence in the last 4 weeks of at least 5/10 selected symptoms (anorexia, nausea, vomiting, upper abdominal pain, postprandial bloating, abdominal fullness, early satiety, belching, heartburn, regurgitation), severity of which should reach/exceed a total score of 8, as assessed by a specific scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe); b) normal results of routine biochemical, ultrasound and endoscopic examinations. In addition, each patient subjectively evaluated efficacy of treatment by a visual analogue scale. Significant improvement was recorded for all symptoms at days 10 and 28 in all groups (p < 0.001), but levosulpiride was significantly (p < 0.01) superior to domperidone, metoclopramide and placebo both in the overall clinical improvement scale as well as in a subgroup of symptoms (postprandial bloating, epigastric pain, heartburn). Active treatments and placebo were comparable as far as concerns occurrence of side-effects (12-20%) including galactorrhoea, breast tenderness and menstrual changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22546,"journal":{"name":"The Italian journal of gastroenterology","volume":"28 6","pages":"317-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levosulpiride in functional dyspepsia: a multicentric, double-blind, controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"G R Corazza,&nbsp;F Biagi,&nbsp;O Albano,&nbsp;G Bianchi Porro,&nbsp;R Cheli,&nbsp;G Mazzacca,&nbsp;F Miglio,&nbsp;R Naccarato,&nbsp;D Quaglino,&nbsp;C Surrenti,&nbsp;G Verme,&nbsp;G Gasbarrini\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abnormalities in gastrointestinal motility have been reported in a substantial proportion of patients with functional dyspepsia, supporting the use of prokinetic drugs for treatment of dyspeptic symptoms. To evaluate efficacy and safety of levosulpiride in short-term treatment, 1298 patients were enrolled in a double-blind multicentric study carried out in 45 Italian Gastroenterology Departments. Patients were randomly assigned to either levosulpiride (25 mg tid), domperidone (10 mg tid), metoclopramide (10 mg tid) or placebo (1 tablet tid) for 4 weeks. Patients were selected on the basis of: a) occurrence in the last 4 weeks of at least 5/10 selected symptoms (anorexia, nausea, vomiting, upper abdominal pain, postprandial bloating, abdominal fullness, early satiety, belching, heartburn, regurgitation), severity of which should reach/exceed a total score of 8, as assessed by a specific scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe); b) normal results of routine biochemical, ultrasound and endoscopic examinations. In addition, each patient subjectively evaluated efficacy of treatment by a visual analogue scale. Significant improvement was recorded for all symptoms at days 10 and 28 in all groups (p < 0.001), but levosulpiride was significantly (p < 0.01) superior to domperidone, metoclopramide and placebo both in the overall clinical improvement scale as well as in a subgroup of symptoms (postprandial bloating, epigastric pain, heartburn). Active treatments and placebo were comparable as far as concerns occurrence of side-effects (12-20%) including galactorrhoea, breast tenderness and menstrual changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Italian journal of gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"317-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Italian journal of gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian journal of gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,在相当比例的功能性消化不良患者中存在胃肠运动异常,支持使用促运动药物治疗消化不良症状。为了评估左舒必利短期治疗的有效性和安全性,意大利45个消化内科的1298名患者参加了一项双盲多中心研究。患者被随机分配到左舒必利(25 mg tid)、多潘立酮(10 mg tid)、甲氧氯普胺(10 mg tid)或安慰剂(1片tid),持续4周。选择患者的标准是:a)在过去4周内至少出现5/10种选定症状(厌食、恶心、呕吐、上腹痛、餐后腹胀、腹饱、早饱、打嗝、胃灼热、反流),其严重程度应达到/超过总分8分,以特定评分范围从0(无)到3(严重)进行评估;B)常规生化、超声和内窥镜检查结果正常。此外,每位患者通过视觉模拟量表主观评价治疗效果。所有组在第10天和第28天的所有症状均有显著改善(p < 0.001),但无论是在总体临床改善量表上,还是在症状亚组(餐后腹胀、上腹痛、胃灼热)上,左舒必利均显著(p < 0.01)优于多潘立酮、甲氧氯普胺和安慰剂。就副作用的发生率(12-20%)而言,积极治疗和安慰剂相当,包括乳溢、乳房压痛和月经变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Levosulpiride in functional dyspepsia: a multicentric, double-blind, controlled trial.

Abnormalities in gastrointestinal motility have been reported in a substantial proportion of patients with functional dyspepsia, supporting the use of prokinetic drugs for treatment of dyspeptic symptoms. To evaluate efficacy and safety of levosulpiride in short-term treatment, 1298 patients were enrolled in a double-blind multicentric study carried out in 45 Italian Gastroenterology Departments. Patients were randomly assigned to either levosulpiride (25 mg tid), domperidone (10 mg tid), metoclopramide (10 mg tid) or placebo (1 tablet tid) for 4 weeks. Patients were selected on the basis of: a) occurrence in the last 4 weeks of at least 5/10 selected symptoms (anorexia, nausea, vomiting, upper abdominal pain, postprandial bloating, abdominal fullness, early satiety, belching, heartburn, regurgitation), severity of which should reach/exceed a total score of 8, as assessed by a specific scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe); b) normal results of routine biochemical, ultrasound and endoscopic examinations. In addition, each patient subjectively evaluated efficacy of treatment by a visual analogue scale. Significant improvement was recorded for all symptoms at days 10 and 28 in all groups (p < 0.001), but levosulpiride was significantly (p < 0.01) superior to domperidone, metoclopramide and placebo both in the overall clinical improvement scale as well as in a subgroup of symptoms (postprandial bloating, epigastric pain, heartburn). Active treatments and placebo were comparable as far as concerns occurrence of side-effects (12-20%) including galactorrhoea, breast tenderness and menstrual changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信