没有证据表明肝出生的唐氏综合征患者存在基因组印记。

C Stoll, Y Alembik, B Dott, J Feingold
{"title":"没有证据表明肝出生的唐氏综合征患者存在基因组印记。","authors":"C Stoll,&nbsp;Y Alembik,&nbsp;B Dott,&nbsp;J Feingold","doi":"10.1017/s0001566000001434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite numerous studies, the clinical heterogeneity of Down syndrome has no explanation. We have attempted to investigate the role of genomic imprinting in the phenotype of liveborn Down syndrome patients. Hundred fifty eight patients were investigated for parental origin of the extra chromosome 21 with standard cytogenetic analyses and with DNA plymorphic markers. The extra chromosome 21 was of paternal origin in 8 cases and of maternal origin in 150 cases. The phenotype of Down syndrome patients in whom the nondisjunction was of maternal origin, was not different from the phenotype of Down syndrome patients in whom the nondisjunction was of paternal origin. We conclude that imprinting may probably not play a role in the heterogeneity of Down syndrome phenotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":7118,"journal":{"name":"Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae","volume":"45 1-2","pages":"265-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0001566000001434","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No evidence for genomic imprinting in liver-born Down syndrome patients.\",\"authors\":\"C Stoll,&nbsp;Y Alembik,&nbsp;B Dott,&nbsp;J Feingold\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0001566000001434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite numerous studies, the clinical heterogeneity of Down syndrome has no explanation. We have attempted to investigate the role of genomic imprinting in the phenotype of liveborn Down syndrome patients. Hundred fifty eight patients were investigated for parental origin of the extra chromosome 21 with standard cytogenetic analyses and with DNA plymorphic markers. The extra chromosome 21 was of paternal origin in 8 cases and of maternal origin in 150 cases. The phenotype of Down syndrome patients in whom the nondisjunction was of maternal origin, was not different from the phenotype of Down syndrome patients in whom the nondisjunction was of paternal origin. We conclude that imprinting may probably not play a role in the heterogeneity of Down syndrome phenotype.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae\",\"volume\":\"45 1-2\",\"pages\":\"265-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0001566000001434\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001566000001434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001566000001434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管有大量的研究,唐氏综合症的临床异质性没有解释。我们试图研究基因组印记在活产唐氏综合征患者表型中的作用。用标准细胞遗传学分析和DNA多态性标记对158例患者进行了21号染色体额外亲本来源的调查。多出的21号染色体8例来自父系,150例来自母系。非分离系母系起源的唐氏综合征患者的表型与非分离系父系起源的唐氏综合征患者的表型没有差异。我们得出结论,印迹可能不会在唐氏综合征表型的异质性中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No evidence for genomic imprinting in liver-born Down syndrome patients.

Despite numerous studies, the clinical heterogeneity of Down syndrome has no explanation. We have attempted to investigate the role of genomic imprinting in the phenotype of liveborn Down syndrome patients. Hundred fifty eight patients were investigated for parental origin of the extra chromosome 21 with standard cytogenetic analyses and with DNA plymorphic markers. The extra chromosome 21 was of paternal origin in 8 cases and of maternal origin in 150 cases. The phenotype of Down syndrome patients in whom the nondisjunction was of maternal origin, was not different from the phenotype of Down syndrome patients in whom the nondisjunction was of paternal origin. We conclude that imprinting may probably not play a role in the heterogeneity of Down syndrome phenotype.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信