全身麻醉对细胞因子诱导的大鼠肠系膜小静脉中性粒细胞聚集的抑制作用。

L S Miller, Y Morita, U Rangan, S Kondo, M G Clemens, G B Bulkley
{"title":"全身麻醉对细胞因子诱导的大鼠肠系膜小静脉中性粒细胞聚集的抑制作用。","authors":"L S Miller,&nbsp;Y Morita,&nbsp;U Rangan,&nbsp;S Kondo,&nbsp;M G Clemens,&nbsp;G B Bulkley","doi":"10.1159/000179165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most studies of neutrophil-endothelial interactions in vivo necessarily require the use of general anesthetic agents which are well known to be immunosuppressive. By using whole-mount preparations of the rat mesoappendix, we were able to study tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) induced neutrophil adhesion to the mesenteric venular endothelium in vivo without necessarily using general anesthesia. TNF-alpha significantly increased venular-neutrophil accumulation in a dose-dependent manner, accumulation was markedly increased at 1, 2, and 4 h, but returned to baseline after 24 h. After these preliminary dose-response and time-course studies, we evaluated the influence of standard clinically effective doses of several commonly used anesthetic agents (thiopental, pentobarbital, ketamine, alpha-chloralose, methoxyflurane, and halothane) on the extent of neutrophil-venular accumulation induced 2 h after intraperitoneal injection of 0.4 mg/kg TNF-alpha, compared to unanesthetized rats. All general anesthetics tested, with the exception of methoxyflurane, significantly suppressed this response. In most cases this suppression was striking (from 60 to 85%) such that a statistically significant proinflammatory response was obscured. Although methoxyflurane also tended to suppress this response to TNF-alpha, it was the only agent that allowed the response to be clearly seen. Because anesthesia markedly suppresses cytokine-induced neutrophil-venular adhesion, this model should provide an important complementary technique to the classical in vivo microcirculatory approaches which do necessarily require general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14035,"journal":{"name":"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000179165","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suppression of cytokine-induced neutrophil accumulation in rat mesenteric venules in vivo by general anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"L S Miller,&nbsp;Y Morita,&nbsp;U Rangan,&nbsp;S Kondo,&nbsp;M G Clemens,&nbsp;G B Bulkley\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000179165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most studies of neutrophil-endothelial interactions in vivo necessarily require the use of general anesthetic agents which are well known to be immunosuppressive. By using whole-mount preparations of the rat mesoappendix, we were able to study tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) induced neutrophil adhesion to the mesenteric venular endothelium in vivo without necessarily using general anesthesia. TNF-alpha significantly increased venular-neutrophil accumulation in a dose-dependent manner, accumulation was markedly increased at 1, 2, and 4 h, but returned to baseline after 24 h. After these preliminary dose-response and time-course studies, we evaluated the influence of standard clinically effective doses of several commonly used anesthetic agents (thiopental, pentobarbital, ketamine, alpha-chloralose, methoxyflurane, and halothane) on the extent of neutrophil-venular accumulation induced 2 h after intraperitoneal injection of 0.4 mg/kg TNF-alpha, compared to unanesthetized rats. All general anesthetics tested, with the exception of methoxyflurane, significantly suppressed this response. In most cases this suppression was striking (from 60 to 85%) such that a statistically significant proinflammatory response was obscured. Although methoxyflurane also tended to suppress this response to TNF-alpha, it was the only agent that allowed the response to be clearly seen. Because anesthesia markedly suppresses cytokine-induced neutrophil-venular adhesion, this model should provide an important complementary technique to the classical in vivo microcirculatory approaches which do necessarily require general anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000179165\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000179165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000179165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

大多数中性粒细胞-内皮细胞相互作用的体内研究都需要使用全身麻醉剂,众所周知,全身麻醉剂具有免疫抑制作用。通过使用大鼠肠系膜阑尾全贴装制剂,我们能够在体内研究肿瘤坏死因子α (tnf - α)诱导的中性粒细胞粘附在肠系膜静脉内皮上,而不必使用全身麻醉。tnf - α以剂量依赖的方式显著增加静脉中性粒细胞积聚,积聚在1、2和4小时显著增加,但在24小时后恢复到基线水平。在这些初步的剂量反应和时间过程研究之后,我们评估了几种常用麻醉剂(硫喷妥钠、戊巴比妥、氯胺酮、-氯氯醛、甲氧基氟醚、与未麻醉大鼠相比,腹腔注射0.4 mg/kg tnf - α 2 h后中性粒细胞-静脉积聚程度的变化。除甲氧基氟醚外,所有的全身麻醉剂都能显著抑制这种反应。在大多数情况下,这种抑制是显著的(从60%到85%),以至于统计学上显著的促炎反应被掩盖了。虽然甲氧基氟醚也倾向于抑制这种对tnf - α的反应,但它是唯一一种能够清楚地看到这种反应的药物。由于麻醉可以显著抑制细胞因子诱导的中性粒细胞-静脉粘附,因此该模型应该为经典的体内微循环方法提供重要的补充技术,而这种方法确实需要全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suppression of cytokine-induced neutrophil accumulation in rat mesenteric venules in vivo by general anesthesia.

Most studies of neutrophil-endothelial interactions in vivo necessarily require the use of general anesthetic agents which are well known to be immunosuppressive. By using whole-mount preparations of the rat mesoappendix, we were able to study tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) induced neutrophil adhesion to the mesenteric venular endothelium in vivo without necessarily using general anesthesia. TNF-alpha significantly increased venular-neutrophil accumulation in a dose-dependent manner, accumulation was markedly increased at 1, 2, and 4 h, but returned to baseline after 24 h. After these preliminary dose-response and time-course studies, we evaluated the influence of standard clinically effective doses of several commonly used anesthetic agents (thiopental, pentobarbital, ketamine, alpha-chloralose, methoxyflurane, and halothane) on the extent of neutrophil-venular accumulation induced 2 h after intraperitoneal injection of 0.4 mg/kg TNF-alpha, compared to unanesthetized rats. All general anesthetics tested, with the exception of methoxyflurane, significantly suppressed this response. In most cases this suppression was striking (from 60 to 85%) such that a statistically significant proinflammatory response was obscured. Although methoxyflurane also tended to suppress this response to TNF-alpha, it was the only agent that allowed the response to be clearly seen. Because anesthesia markedly suppresses cytokine-induced neutrophil-venular adhesion, this model should provide an important complementary technique to the classical in vivo microcirculatory approaches which do necessarily require general anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信