姑息性放疗对脑转移瘤的作用。

The Canadian journal of oncology Pub Date : 1996-02-01
L Paszat, G Shenouda, P Blood, M C Nolan, J L Pater, T Whelan
{"title":"姑息性放疗对脑转移瘤的作用。","authors":"L Paszat,&nbsp;G Shenouda,&nbsp;P Blood,&nbsp;M C Nolan,&nbsp;J L Pater,&nbsp;T Whelan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain metastases (BRM) are common complications of malignancy, frequently associated with disability and death. Clinical trials have addressed a few of the issues arising from treatment options for BRM. Phase III trials have shown superior survival for patients with solitary resectable BRM (SRBRM) when palliative radiation treatment (RT) to the brain is preceded by resection compared to brain RT alone, but no trial has explored resection plus brain RT compared to resection alone. One Phase III trial in patients with solitary unresected BRM comparing lower to higher doses of RT has shown a small survival advantage with higher-dose radiotherapy. All other trials, however, comparing different radiation doses and fractionation schedules have failed to indicate improved outcomes from treatment more intense than 2000 cGy in 5 fractions over 1 week (in any subset of patients with unresected BRM). A panel of radiation oncologists and medical oncologists discussed a literature review and results of Phase III trials of therapy for BRM. The panel was instructed to identify from these trials any evidence for the efficacy, indications, toxicity and fractionation of palliative RT for BRM. The panel concluded that unresected BRM is a possible indication for brain RT. The panel concluded that the benefits and toxicities of brain RT for unresected BRM are not characterized adequately to allow a stronger recommendation. The panel concluded that there is no evidence for superiority for any dose or schedule of brain RT for BRM more protracted or intense than 2000 cGy in 5 fractions over one week. The panel recommended further study in order to characterize the benefits and toxicities of brain RT for unresectable BRM. The panel considered the potential value of conducting a Phase III trial comparing palliative care and strategies that included brain RT to the same strategies excluding brain RT; the panel did not, however, reach consensus on the feasibility of such a trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":79379,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of oncology","volume":"6 Suppl 1 ","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases.\",\"authors\":\"L Paszat,&nbsp;G Shenouda,&nbsp;P Blood,&nbsp;M C Nolan,&nbsp;J L Pater,&nbsp;T Whelan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Brain metastases (BRM) are common complications of malignancy, frequently associated with disability and death. Clinical trials have addressed a few of the issues arising from treatment options for BRM. Phase III trials have shown superior survival for patients with solitary resectable BRM (SRBRM) when palliative radiation treatment (RT) to the brain is preceded by resection compared to brain RT alone, but no trial has explored resection plus brain RT compared to resection alone. One Phase III trial in patients with solitary unresected BRM comparing lower to higher doses of RT has shown a small survival advantage with higher-dose radiotherapy. All other trials, however, comparing different radiation doses and fractionation schedules have failed to indicate improved outcomes from treatment more intense than 2000 cGy in 5 fractions over 1 week (in any subset of patients with unresected BRM). A panel of radiation oncologists and medical oncologists discussed a literature review and results of Phase III trials of therapy for BRM. The panel was instructed to identify from these trials any evidence for the efficacy, indications, toxicity and fractionation of palliative RT for BRM. The panel concluded that unresected BRM is a possible indication for brain RT. The panel concluded that the benefits and toxicities of brain RT for unresected BRM are not characterized adequately to allow a stronger recommendation. The panel concluded that there is no evidence for superiority for any dose or schedule of brain RT for BRM more protracted or intense than 2000 cGy in 5 fractions over one week. The panel recommended further study in order to characterize the benefits and toxicities of brain RT for unresectable BRM. The panel considered the potential value of conducting a Phase III trial comparing palliative care and strategies that included brain RT to the same strategies excluding brain RT; the panel did not, however, reach consensus on the feasibility of such a trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of oncology\",\"volume\":\"6 Suppl 1 \",\"pages\":\"48-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑转移瘤(BRM)是恶性肿瘤的常见并发症,常伴有残疾和死亡。临床试验已经解决了BRM治疗方案中出现的一些问题。III期试验显示,与单纯脑放疗相比,单纯可切除BRM (SRBRM)患者在接受姑息性脑放疗(RT)前进行脑切除的生存率更高,但没有试验探讨切除加脑RT与单纯脑切除的生存率。一项针对孤立性未切除BRM患者的III期试验比较了低剂量放疗与高剂量放疗,结果显示高剂量放疗的生存优势较小。然而,所有其他比较不同辐射剂量和分次方案的试验都未能表明,在1周内(在任何未切除的BRM患者亚组中),分5次接受强度超过2000 cGy的治疗可改善预后。一个由放射肿瘤学家和医学肿瘤学家组成的小组讨论了一篇文献综述和BRM治疗的三期试验结果。专家组被指示从这些试验中确定关于BRM姑息性放疗的疗效、适应症、毒性和分级的任何证据。专家小组的结论是,未切除的BRM可能是脑RT的适应症。专家小组的结论是,脑RT治疗未切除的BRM的益处和毒性尚未得到充分的描述,因此不能提出更强有力的建议。该小组得出结论,没有证据表明任何剂量或方案的脑放射治疗对持续时间超过2000cgy的BRM有优越性。该小组建议进一步研究,以确定脑RT治疗不可切除BRM的益处和毒性。专家组考虑了开展一项比较姑息治疗和包括脑放疗的策略与不包括脑放疗的相同策略的III期试验的潜在价值;然而,该小组没有就这种试验的可行性达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases.

Brain metastases (BRM) are common complications of malignancy, frequently associated with disability and death. Clinical trials have addressed a few of the issues arising from treatment options for BRM. Phase III trials have shown superior survival for patients with solitary resectable BRM (SRBRM) when palliative radiation treatment (RT) to the brain is preceded by resection compared to brain RT alone, but no trial has explored resection plus brain RT compared to resection alone. One Phase III trial in patients with solitary unresected BRM comparing lower to higher doses of RT has shown a small survival advantage with higher-dose radiotherapy. All other trials, however, comparing different radiation doses and fractionation schedules have failed to indicate improved outcomes from treatment more intense than 2000 cGy in 5 fractions over 1 week (in any subset of patients with unresected BRM). A panel of radiation oncologists and medical oncologists discussed a literature review and results of Phase III trials of therapy for BRM. The panel was instructed to identify from these trials any evidence for the efficacy, indications, toxicity and fractionation of palliative RT for BRM. The panel concluded that unresected BRM is a possible indication for brain RT. The panel concluded that the benefits and toxicities of brain RT for unresected BRM are not characterized adequately to allow a stronger recommendation. The panel concluded that there is no evidence for superiority for any dose or schedule of brain RT for BRM more protracted or intense than 2000 cGy in 5 fractions over one week. The panel recommended further study in order to characterize the benefits and toxicities of brain RT for unresectable BRM. The panel considered the potential value of conducting a Phase III trial comparing palliative care and strategies that included brain RT to the same strategies excluding brain RT; the panel did not, however, reach consensus on the feasibility of such a trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信