M Zerbib, S Conquy, E Younes, N Thiounn, T A Flam, B Debré
{"title":"[经尿道前列腺汽化治疗良性肥大:初步临床和组织学研究]。","authors":"M Zerbib, S Conquy, E Younes, N Thiounn, T A Flam, B Debré","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty five patients with symptomatic BPH and normal PSA underwent electrovaporization. The mean IPSS was 21.5 before and 7.8 three months after treatment while the mean peakflow was 7.1 ml/s and became 16.9. With a short hospital stay (3 days) and a very low morbidity, electrovaporization seems to be a good alternative to TURP. A longer follow-up is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":77191,"journal":{"name":"Journal d'urologie","volume":"102 2","pages":"79-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Transurethral vaporization of the prostate for benign hypertrophy: preliminary clinical and histological study].\",\"authors\":\"M Zerbib, S Conquy, E Younes, N Thiounn, T A Flam, B Debré\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Twenty five patients with symptomatic BPH and normal PSA underwent electrovaporization. The mean IPSS was 21.5 before and 7.8 three months after treatment while the mean peakflow was 7.1 ml/s and became 16.9. With a short hospital stay (3 days) and a very low morbidity, electrovaporization seems to be a good alternative to TURP. A longer follow-up is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal d'urologie\",\"volume\":\"102 2\",\"pages\":\"79-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal d'urologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal d'urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Transurethral vaporization of the prostate for benign hypertrophy: preliminary clinical and histological study].
Twenty five patients with symptomatic BPH and normal PSA underwent electrovaporization. The mean IPSS was 21.5 before and 7.8 three months after treatment while the mean peakflow was 7.1 ml/s and became 16.9. With a short hospital stay (3 days) and a very low morbidity, electrovaporization seems to be a good alternative to TURP. A longer follow-up is necessary.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
