{"title":"使用486种化学品的测试结果验证SOS/umu测试,并与Ames测试和致癌性数据进行比较","authors":"Georg Reifferscheid, Jürgen Heil","doi":"10.1016/S0165-1218(96)90021-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study gives a comprehensive update of all <em>umu</em> genotoxicity assay results published so far. The available data of 486 chemicals investigated with the <em>umu</em> test are compared with the Ames test (274 compounds) as well as rodent carcinogenicity data (179 compounds). On the whole, there is good agreement between the <em>umu</em> test and the Ames test results, with a concordance of about 90%. The <em>umu</em> test was able to detect 86% of the Ames mutagens, while the Ames test (using at least 5 strains) detected 97% of the <em>umu</em> positive compounds. The elimination of TA102 from the set of Ames tester strains reduced the percentage of detectable <em>umu</em> genotoxins from 97 to 86%. The agreement between carcinogenesis and <em>umu</em> response was 65%, which is comparable to earlier studies concerning rodent carcinogenesis and Salmonella mutagenesis. The present compilation of <em>umu</em> results provides a database that can be used for the comparison of the SOS-inducing activity of chemicals and their mutagenicity, respectively, carcinogenicity. The results presented here clearly demonstrate that a chemical which induces the expression of the <em>umu</em> operon can be regarded a rodent carcinogen with a high degree of certainty (93%).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100938,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology","volume":"369 3","pages":"Pages 129-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-1218(96)90021-X","citationCount":"180","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data\",\"authors\":\"Georg Reifferscheid, Jürgen Heil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0165-1218(96)90021-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study gives a comprehensive update of all <em>umu</em> genotoxicity assay results published so far. The available data of 486 chemicals investigated with the <em>umu</em> test are compared with the Ames test (274 compounds) as well as rodent carcinogenicity data (179 compounds). On the whole, there is good agreement between the <em>umu</em> test and the Ames test results, with a concordance of about 90%. The <em>umu</em> test was able to detect 86% of the Ames mutagens, while the Ames test (using at least 5 strains) detected 97% of the <em>umu</em> positive compounds. The elimination of TA102 from the set of Ames tester strains reduced the percentage of detectable <em>umu</em> genotoxins from 97 to 86%. The agreement between carcinogenesis and <em>umu</em> response was 65%, which is comparable to earlier studies concerning rodent carcinogenesis and Salmonella mutagenesis. The present compilation of <em>umu</em> results provides a database that can be used for the comparison of the SOS-inducing activity of chemicals and their mutagenicity, respectively, carcinogenicity. The results presented here clearly demonstrate that a chemical which induces the expression of the <em>umu</em> operon can be regarded a rodent carcinogen with a high degree of certainty (93%).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"369 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 129-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-1218(96)90021-X\",\"citationCount\":\"180\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016512189690021X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016512189690021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data
The present study gives a comprehensive update of all umu genotoxicity assay results published so far. The available data of 486 chemicals investigated with the umu test are compared with the Ames test (274 compounds) as well as rodent carcinogenicity data (179 compounds). On the whole, there is good agreement between the umu test and the Ames test results, with a concordance of about 90%. The umu test was able to detect 86% of the Ames mutagens, while the Ames test (using at least 5 strains) detected 97% of the umu positive compounds. The elimination of TA102 from the set of Ames tester strains reduced the percentage of detectable umu genotoxins from 97 to 86%. The agreement between carcinogenesis and umu response was 65%, which is comparable to earlier studies concerning rodent carcinogenesis and Salmonella mutagenesis. The present compilation of umu results provides a database that can be used for the comparison of the SOS-inducing activity of chemicals and their mutagenicity, respectively, carcinogenicity. The results presented here clearly demonstrate that a chemical which induces the expression of the umu operon can be regarded a rodent carcinogen with a high degree of certainty (93%).