血浆置换术在62岁重症感染患者中的应用

A Koepp, R Lampert
{"title":"血浆置换术在62岁重症感染患者中的应用","authors":"A Koepp,&nbsp;R Lampert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The elimination of cytotoxic substances from blood as part of sepsis treatment has been controversely discussed so far. The following case report demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of this therapy strategy.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 62-year-old male patient developed a paralytic ileus with wound dissection 3 days after elective sigma resection. A few hours after surgical revision he went into severe sepsis. A controlled ventilation was necessary as well as the use of catecholamines to maintain sufficient mean arterial pressure. Body temperature stayed between 39 and 40 degrees C (rectal). The patient's extremities and body showed severe marmorations due to the pathologic vasal alteration. A laparotomy one day after the operation revealed a massive generalized edema of the bowels without any evidence of insufficient anastomosis. The fulminant septic process could not be stopped with conservative treatment including continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Under further deterioration of the pulmonary function (signs of beginning ARDS) and the generalized capillary leak syndrome we started plasmapheresis 2 days after operation in order to eliminate high-molecular cytokines. The plasmapheresis was done twice the following 2 days. Under this treatment the septic process was stopped. The pulmonary function and the circulation improved. The disturbed peripheral perfusion normalized. A laparotomy confirmed a significant decrease of the intestine wall edema. Unfortunately we could not repeat plasmapheresis. On the following days the patient worsened again and died 20 days later due to multiorgan failure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The temporary improvement during plasmapheresis suggests that the patient might have profited from plasmapheresis-related optimized oxygen delivery, controlled diuresis and decrease of oxygen consumption. In addition we hypothesized that elimination of high-molecular cytokines and toxines contributed to the improvement under plasmapheresis. Using plasmapheresis one has to consider the high costs, risk of infection, and the unexplained mode of action to the mediatory process. Therefore we cannot recommend this treatment in general. Further controlled studies should investigate the therapeutic benefits of plasmapheresis in patients with severe sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"23 2","pages":"92-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Use of plasmapheresis in a 62-year-old patient with severe infection].\",\"authors\":\"A Koepp,&nbsp;R Lampert\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The elimination of cytotoxic substances from blood as part of sepsis treatment has been controversely discussed so far. The following case report demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of this therapy strategy.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 62-year-old male patient developed a paralytic ileus with wound dissection 3 days after elective sigma resection. A few hours after surgical revision he went into severe sepsis. A controlled ventilation was necessary as well as the use of catecholamines to maintain sufficient mean arterial pressure. Body temperature stayed between 39 and 40 degrees C (rectal). The patient's extremities and body showed severe marmorations due to the pathologic vasal alteration. A laparotomy one day after the operation revealed a massive generalized edema of the bowels without any evidence of insufficient anastomosis. The fulminant septic process could not be stopped with conservative treatment including continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Under further deterioration of the pulmonary function (signs of beginning ARDS) and the generalized capillary leak syndrome we started plasmapheresis 2 days after operation in order to eliminate high-molecular cytokines. The plasmapheresis was done twice the following 2 days. Under this treatment the septic process was stopped. The pulmonary function and the circulation improved. The disturbed peripheral perfusion normalized. A laparotomy confirmed a significant decrease of the intestine wall edema. Unfortunately we could not repeat plasmapheresis. On the following days the patient worsened again and died 20 days later due to multiorgan failure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The temporary improvement during plasmapheresis suggests that the patient might have profited from plasmapheresis-related optimized oxygen delivery, controlled diuresis and decrease of oxygen consumption. In addition we hypothesized that elimination of high-molecular cytokines and toxines contributed to the improvement under plasmapheresis. Using plasmapheresis one has to consider the high costs, risk of infection, and the unexplained mode of action to the mediatory process. Therefore we cannot recommend this treatment in general. Further controlled studies should investigate the therapeutic benefits of plasmapheresis in patients with severe sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"92-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:作为脓毒症治疗的一部分,从血液中清除细胞毒性物质的讨论一直存在争议。下面的病例报告展示了这种治疗策略的优点和缺点。病例报告:一名62岁男性患者在选择性西格玛切除术后3天发生麻痹性肠梗阻并伤口夹层。手术后几个小时,他出现了严重的败血症。控制通气和使用儿茶酚胺来维持足够的平均动脉压是必要的。体温保持在39到40摄氏度之间(直肠)。由于病理性血管改变,患者的四肢和身体出现了严重的损伤。术后一天开腹检查发现肠子大面积全身性水肿,没有吻合不全的迹象。持续静脉-静脉血液滤过等保守治疗无法阻止暴发性脓毒症的发生。在肺功能进一步恶化(ARDS开始的迹象)和广泛性毛细血管渗漏综合征的情况下,我们在术后2天开始血浆置换,以消除高分子细胞因子。术后2天进行2次血浆置换。在这种处理下,脓毒症过程停止了。肺功能和循环得到改善。外周灌注紊乱恢复正常。剖腹手术证实肠壁水肿明显减轻。不幸的是,我们不能重复血浆置换。接下来的几天,患者病情再次恶化,20天后因多器官衰竭死亡。讨论:血浆置换期间的暂时性改善提示患者可能受益于血浆置换相关的优化氧输送、控制利尿和减少耗氧量。此外,我们假设消除高分子细胞因子和毒素有助于血浆置换的改善。使用血浆置换必须考虑到高昂的费用、感染的风险以及无法解释的对介导过程的作用方式。因此,我们不能普遍推荐这种治疗方法。进一步的对照研究应探讨血浆置换对严重脓毒症患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Use of plasmapheresis in a 62-year-old patient with severe infection].

Introduction: The elimination of cytotoxic substances from blood as part of sepsis treatment has been controversely discussed so far. The following case report demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of this therapy strategy.

Case report: A 62-year-old male patient developed a paralytic ileus with wound dissection 3 days after elective sigma resection. A few hours after surgical revision he went into severe sepsis. A controlled ventilation was necessary as well as the use of catecholamines to maintain sufficient mean arterial pressure. Body temperature stayed between 39 and 40 degrees C (rectal). The patient's extremities and body showed severe marmorations due to the pathologic vasal alteration. A laparotomy one day after the operation revealed a massive generalized edema of the bowels without any evidence of insufficient anastomosis. The fulminant septic process could not be stopped with conservative treatment including continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Under further deterioration of the pulmonary function (signs of beginning ARDS) and the generalized capillary leak syndrome we started plasmapheresis 2 days after operation in order to eliminate high-molecular cytokines. The plasmapheresis was done twice the following 2 days. Under this treatment the septic process was stopped. The pulmonary function and the circulation improved. The disturbed peripheral perfusion normalized. A laparotomy confirmed a significant decrease of the intestine wall edema. Unfortunately we could not repeat plasmapheresis. On the following days the patient worsened again and died 20 days later due to multiorgan failure.

Discussion: The temporary improvement during plasmapheresis suggests that the patient might have profited from plasmapheresis-related optimized oxygen delivery, controlled diuresis and decrease of oxygen consumption. In addition we hypothesized that elimination of high-molecular cytokines and toxines contributed to the improvement under plasmapheresis. Using plasmapheresis one has to consider the high costs, risk of infection, and the unexplained mode of action to the mediatory process. Therefore we cannot recommend this treatment in general. Further controlled studies should investigate the therapeutic benefits of plasmapheresis in patients with severe sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信