足部手术中的镇痛。约1373例患者]。

Cahiers d'anesthesiologie Pub Date : 1996-01-01
A Frédéric, Y Bouchon
{"title":"足部手术中的镇痛。约1373例患者]。","authors":"A Frédéric,&nbsp;Y Bouchon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study concerns 1,373 adult patients who underwent forefoot surgery during 1988-95 under regional anaesthesia by ankle nerve blocks (of posterior tibial nerve systematically and other nerves according to the surgical site). As a rule, plain bupivacaine 0.5% (maximum 40 mL) was used, completed if necessary by lidocaine 1% (a few mL). A nerve stimulator is currently used for posterior tibial blocks. About 50% of indications (such as hallux surgery) require short hospitalization (3 days). A catheter is inserted near to the posterior tibial nerve by the surgeon, allowing postoperative reinjections of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% every 6 hrs by nurses, for 1-2.5 days. Other patients undergoing minor procedures (material removal, cysts, exostosis, etc.) can be operated on a day-care basis, without postoperative analgesic injections. Results were very satisfactory for both patients and surgeons. No general anaesthesia was needed (except after one case of convulsions, likely from accidental injection of a few mL of local anaesthetic and without any sequelae). Five patients complained of temporary paraesthesias, with indication of a posterior tibial neurolysis in one case and complete recovery. Thus ankle blocks appear increasingly to be a satisfactory alternative to general anaesthesia for most surgical procedures on the forefoot, provided that all usual safety conditions are respected and the patient's acceptance of the procedure is obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":77055,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie","volume":"44 2","pages":"115-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Analgesia in surgery of the foot. Apropos of 1373 patients].\",\"authors\":\"A Frédéric,&nbsp;Y Bouchon\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This retrospective study concerns 1,373 adult patients who underwent forefoot surgery during 1988-95 under regional anaesthesia by ankle nerve blocks (of posterior tibial nerve systematically and other nerves according to the surgical site). As a rule, plain bupivacaine 0.5% (maximum 40 mL) was used, completed if necessary by lidocaine 1% (a few mL). A nerve stimulator is currently used for posterior tibial blocks. About 50% of indications (such as hallux surgery) require short hospitalization (3 days). A catheter is inserted near to the posterior tibial nerve by the surgeon, allowing postoperative reinjections of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% every 6 hrs by nurses, for 1-2.5 days. Other patients undergoing minor procedures (material removal, cysts, exostosis, etc.) can be operated on a day-care basis, without postoperative analgesic injections. Results were very satisfactory for both patients and surgeons. No general anaesthesia was needed (except after one case of convulsions, likely from accidental injection of a few mL of local anaesthetic and without any sequelae). Five patients complained of temporary paraesthesias, with indication of a posterior tibial neurolysis in one case and complete recovery. Thus ankle blocks appear increasingly to be a satisfactory alternative to general anaesthesia for most surgical procedures on the forefoot, provided that all usual safety conditions are respected and the patient's acceptance of the procedure is obtained.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"115-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers d'anesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本回顾性研究涉及1988- 1995年期间在踝关节神经阻滞区域麻醉下接受前足手术的1373例成年患者(根据手术部位系统地阻滞胫后神经和其他神经)。通常使用0.5%普通布比卡因(最多40 mL),必要时再加入1%利多卡因(几mL)。神经刺激器目前用于胫骨后部阻滞。约50%的指征(如拇外翻手术)需要短期住院(3天)。外科医生在胫骨后神经附近插入导管,术后护士每6小时再注射10ml 0.25%的布比卡因,持续1-2.5天。其他接受小手术(切除物质、囊肿、外生等)的患者可以在日间护理的基础上进行手术,术后无需注射镇痛药。结果对患者和外科医生都非常满意。不需要全身麻醉(除了一例惊厥,可能是由于意外注射了几毫升局部麻醉剂,没有任何后遗症)。5例患者主诉暂时性感觉异常,1例胫后神经松解术后完全康复。因此,在大多数前足手术中,踝关节阻滞似乎越来越成为全身麻醉的一种令人满意的替代方法,只要遵守所有通常的安全条件并获得患者对手术的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Analgesia in surgery of the foot. Apropos of 1373 patients].

This retrospective study concerns 1,373 adult patients who underwent forefoot surgery during 1988-95 under regional anaesthesia by ankle nerve blocks (of posterior tibial nerve systematically and other nerves according to the surgical site). As a rule, plain bupivacaine 0.5% (maximum 40 mL) was used, completed if necessary by lidocaine 1% (a few mL). A nerve stimulator is currently used for posterior tibial blocks. About 50% of indications (such as hallux surgery) require short hospitalization (3 days). A catheter is inserted near to the posterior tibial nerve by the surgeon, allowing postoperative reinjections of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% every 6 hrs by nurses, for 1-2.5 days. Other patients undergoing minor procedures (material removal, cysts, exostosis, etc.) can be operated on a day-care basis, without postoperative analgesic injections. Results were very satisfactory for both patients and surgeons. No general anaesthesia was needed (except after one case of convulsions, likely from accidental injection of a few mL of local anaesthetic and without any sequelae). Five patients complained of temporary paraesthesias, with indication of a posterior tibial neurolysis in one case and complete recovery. Thus ankle blocks appear increasingly to be a satisfactory alternative to general anaesthesia for most surgical procedures on the forefoot, provided that all usual safety conditions are respected and the patient's acceptance of the procedure is obtained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信