体外干细胞清除。

M V Seiden, K C Anderson
{"title":"体外干细胞清除。","authors":"M V Seiden,&nbsp;K C Anderson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last several years there has been significant progress in developing several techniques designed to detect contaminating tumor cells in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). These techniques include immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization (ISH), flow cytometry, clonogenic tumor assays, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays. These assays have detection capabilities ranging from 1 tumor cell in 100 normal cells (ISH) to 1 tumor cell in a million tumor cells (RT-PCR). These techniques have confirmed that BM and PBPC are frequently contaminated with tumor cells, with most studies suggesting higher tumor contamination in the BM as compared to the PBPC. Comparison of immunocytochemistry with the clonogenic assay has demonstrated good but not perfect correlation of these two techniques. Gene marking studies have confirmed that these tumor cells are viable and capable of contributing to disease relapse. Many of the assays are at least semiquantitative and are effective at monitoring for persistent residual tumor cell contamination after ex vivo processing of autografts including purging strategies and/or positive selection techniques. Preliminary data are conflicting, although some data suggest that patients receiving autografts with residual tumor cell contamination do worse than patients receiving autografts free of detectable tumor cells. Many purging techniques are capable of reducing tumor contamination by 3 to 5 logs; positive selection techniques are probably slightly less effective, reducing tumor contamination by 3 to 4 logs. The clinical benefit of purging remains to be demonstrated in randomized clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":79426,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of infusional chemotherapy","volume":"6 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stem cell purging ex vivo.\",\"authors\":\"M V Seiden,&nbsp;K C Anderson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the last several years there has been significant progress in developing several techniques designed to detect contaminating tumor cells in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). These techniques include immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization (ISH), flow cytometry, clonogenic tumor assays, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays. These assays have detection capabilities ranging from 1 tumor cell in 100 normal cells (ISH) to 1 tumor cell in a million tumor cells (RT-PCR). These techniques have confirmed that BM and PBPC are frequently contaminated with tumor cells, with most studies suggesting higher tumor contamination in the BM as compared to the PBPC. Comparison of immunocytochemistry with the clonogenic assay has demonstrated good but not perfect correlation of these two techniques. Gene marking studies have confirmed that these tumor cells are viable and capable of contributing to disease relapse. Many of the assays are at least semiquantitative and are effective at monitoring for persistent residual tumor cell contamination after ex vivo processing of autografts including purging strategies and/or positive selection techniques. Preliminary data are conflicting, although some data suggest that patients receiving autografts with residual tumor cell contamination do worse than patients receiving autografts free of detectable tumor cells. Many purging techniques are capable of reducing tumor contamination by 3 to 5 logs; positive selection techniques are probably slightly less effective, reducing tumor contamination by 3 to 4 logs. The clinical benefit of purging remains to be demonstrated in randomized clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of infusional chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"17-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of infusional chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of infusional chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几年中,在开发几种用于检测骨髓(BM)和外周血祖细胞(PBPC)污染肿瘤细胞的技术方面取得了重大进展。这些技术包括免疫组织化学、原位杂交(ISH)、流式细胞术、克隆源性肿瘤检测和基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测。这些检测方法的检测能力范围从100个正常细胞(ISH)中的1个肿瘤细胞到100万个肿瘤细胞(RT-PCR)中的1个肿瘤细胞。这些技术证实了BM和PBPC经常被肿瘤细胞污染,大多数研究表明BM中肿瘤污染程度高于PBPC。免疫细胞化学与克隆测定的比较表明,这两种技术具有良好但不完全的相关性。基因标记研究已经证实,这些肿瘤细胞是有活力的,并且能够导致疾病复发。许多检测至少是半定量的,在监测自体移植物体外处理后持续残留的肿瘤细胞污染方面是有效的,包括清除策略和/或阳性选择技术。初步数据是相互矛盾的,尽管一些数据表明接受残留肿瘤细胞污染的自体移植物的患者比接受未检测到肿瘤细胞的自体移植物的患者表现更差。许多清除技术能够将肿瘤污染减少3到5个log;阳性选择技术可能稍微不那么有效,将肿瘤污染减少3到4个对数。清洗的临床益处仍有待随机临床试验证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stem cell purging ex vivo.

Over the last several years there has been significant progress in developing several techniques designed to detect contaminating tumor cells in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). These techniques include immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization (ISH), flow cytometry, clonogenic tumor assays, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays. These assays have detection capabilities ranging from 1 tumor cell in 100 normal cells (ISH) to 1 tumor cell in a million tumor cells (RT-PCR). These techniques have confirmed that BM and PBPC are frequently contaminated with tumor cells, with most studies suggesting higher tumor contamination in the BM as compared to the PBPC. Comparison of immunocytochemistry with the clonogenic assay has demonstrated good but not perfect correlation of these two techniques. Gene marking studies have confirmed that these tumor cells are viable and capable of contributing to disease relapse. Many of the assays are at least semiquantitative and are effective at monitoring for persistent residual tumor cell contamination after ex vivo processing of autografts including purging strategies and/or positive selection techniques. Preliminary data are conflicting, although some data suggest that patients receiving autografts with residual tumor cell contamination do worse than patients receiving autografts free of detectable tumor cells. Many purging techniques are capable of reducing tumor contamination by 3 to 5 logs; positive selection techniques are probably slightly less effective, reducing tumor contamination by 3 to 4 logs. The clinical benefit of purging remains to be demonstrated in randomized clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信