不同神经网络算法在急性阑尾炎诊断中的比较

Erkki Pesonen , Matti Eskelinen , Martti Juhola
{"title":"不同神经网络算法在急性阑尾炎诊断中的比较","authors":"Erkki Pesonen ,&nbsp;Matti Eskelinen ,&nbsp;Martti Juhola","doi":"10.1016/0020-7101(95)01147-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Four different neural network algorithms, binary adaptive resonance theory (ART1), self-organizing map, learning vector quantization and back-propagation, were compared in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with different parameter groups. The results show that supervised learning algorithms learning vector quantization and back-propagation were better than unsupervised algorithms in this medical decision making problem. The best results were obtained with the learning vector quantization. The self-organizing map algorithm showed good specificity, but this was in conjunction with lower sensitivity. The best parameter group was found to be the clinical signs. It seems beneficial to design a decision support system which uses these methods in the decision making process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75935,"journal":{"name":"International journal of bio-medical computing","volume":"40 3","pages":"Pages 227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0020-7101(95)01147-1","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different neural network algorithms in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis\",\"authors\":\"Erkki Pesonen ,&nbsp;Matti Eskelinen ,&nbsp;Martti Juhola\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0020-7101(95)01147-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Four different neural network algorithms, binary adaptive resonance theory (ART1), self-organizing map, learning vector quantization and back-propagation, were compared in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with different parameter groups. The results show that supervised learning algorithms learning vector quantization and back-propagation were better than unsupervised algorithms in this medical decision making problem. The best results were obtained with the learning vector quantization. The self-organizing map algorithm showed good specificity, but this was in conjunction with lower sensitivity. The best parameter group was found to be the clinical signs. It seems beneficial to design a decision support system which uses these methods in the decision making process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of bio-medical computing\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 227-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0020-7101(95)01147-1\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of bio-medical computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020710195011471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of bio-medical computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020710195011471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

比较了二元自适应共振理论(ART1)、自组织映射、学习向量量化和反向传播四种不同的神经网络算法对不同参数组急性阑尾炎的诊断效果。结果表明,在该医疗决策问题中,有监督学习算法、学习向量量化算法和反向传播算法优于无监督算法。学习向量量化的效果最好。自组织地图算法表现出良好的特异性,但这与较低的灵敏度有关。临床体征是最佳参数组。在决策过程中运用这些方法设计一个决策支持系统似乎是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of different neural network algorithms in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Four different neural network algorithms, binary adaptive resonance theory (ART1), self-organizing map, learning vector quantization and back-propagation, were compared in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with different parameter groups. The results show that supervised learning algorithms learning vector quantization and back-propagation were better than unsupervised algorithms in this medical decision making problem. The best results were obtained with the learning vector quantization. The self-organizing map algorithm showed good specificity, but this was in conjunction with lower sensitivity. The best parameter group was found to be the clinical signs. It seems beneficial to design a decision support system which uses these methods in the decision making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信