通过视觉诱发反应的个体变异揭示知觉与认知的区别

Valentin D. Constantinescu
{"title":"通过视觉诱发反应的个体变异揭示知觉与认知的区别","authors":"Valentin D. Constantinescu","doi":"10.1016/0020-7101(95)01142-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Searching for a method to objectively detect the cognitive activity of the brain, the variability of visual evoked responses (ER) was analysed in 75 human subjects and 10 animals. The individual ERs of a normal subject were found typically very scattered in the first approx. 120 ms after stimulation, converging at 160–220 ms and then diverging again progressively. This variability pattern (VP) is <em>event-related</em> and is not attributable to background noise. On the other hand, statistically significant correlation showed that in most patients, with anatomically intact visual structures but with pronounced mental troubles, the VP is absent and the ERs are randomly scattered. Based on these results we consider that the event-related variability reflects the <em>cognition</em> function of the subjects and that it is instrumental in evidencing the distinction between cognitive and perceptive processes. The results are further consistent with the idea that cognition implies the chaotic activity of certain neural populations and that the VP reflects this chaotic, non-repetitive, non-linear and impredictable but effective neural activity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75935,"journal":{"name":"International journal of bio-medical computing","volume":"40 3","pages":"Pages 169-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0020-7101(95)01142-0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revealing the distinction between perception and cognition through intra-individual variability of visual evoked responses\",\"authors\":\"Valentin D. Constantinescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0020-7101(95)01142-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Searching for a method to objectively detect the cognitive activity of the brain, the variability of visual evoked responses (ER) was analysed in 75 human subjects and 10 animals. The individual ERs of a normal subject were found typically very scattered in the first approx. 120 ms after stimulation, converging at 160–220 ms and then diverging again progressively. This variability pattern (VP) is <em>event-related</em> and is not attributable to background noise. On the other hand, statistically significant correlation showed that in most patients, with anatomically intact visual structures but with pronounced mental troubles, the VP is absent and the ERs are randomly scattered. Based on these results we consider that the event-related variability reflects the <em>cognition</em> function of the subjects and that it is instrumental in evidencing the distinction between cognitive and perceptive processes. The results are further consistent with the idea that cognition implies the chaotic activity of certain neural populations and that the VP reflects this chaotic, non-repetitive, non-linear and impredictable but effective neural activity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of bio-medical computing\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 169-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0020-7101(95)01142-0\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of bio-medical computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020710195011420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of bio-medical computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020710195011420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了寻找一种客观检测大脑认知活动的方法,对75名人类受试者和10只动物的视觉诱发反应(ER)变异性进行了分析。在第一次近似中,正常受试者的个体er通常是非常分散的。刺激后120 ms,在160-220 ms时收敛,然后再次逐渐发散。这种变异性模式(VP)与事件相关,与背景噪声无关。另一方面,统计学上显著的相关性表明,在大多数解剖学上完整的视觉结构但有明显的精神障碍的患者中,VP缺失,急诊室随机分散。基于这些结果,我们认为事件相关变异性反映了被试的认知功能,并有助于证明认知过程和感知过程之间的区别。结果进一步与认知意味着某些神经群体的混沌活动的观点一致,而VP反映了这种混沌、非重复、非线性和不可预测但有效的神经活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revealing the distinction between perception and cognition through intra-individual variability of visual evoked responses

Searching for a method to objectively detect the cognitive activity of the brain, the variability of visual evoked responses (ER) was analysed in 75 human subjects and 10 animals. The individual ERs of a normal subject were found typically very scattered in the first approx. 120 ms after stimulation, converging at 160–220 ms and then diverging again progressively. This variability pattern (VP) is event-related and is not attributable to background noise. On the other hand, statistically significant correlation showed that in most patients, with anatomically intact visual structures but with pronounced mental troubles, the VP is absent and the ERs are randomly scattered. Based on these results we consider that the event-related variability reflects the cognition function of the subjects and that it is instrumental in evidencing the distinction between cognitive and perceptive processes. The results are further consistent with the idea that cognition implies the chaotic activity of certain neural populations and that the VP reflects this chaotic, non-repetitive, non-linear and impredictable but effective neural activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信