加强捐助者面谈程序:可行性研究。

D J van Rhenen, M H Molijn, J Gorgels, J M van der Linden, L K Ko
{"title":"加强捐助者面谈程序:可行性研究。","authors":"D J van Rhenen,&nbsp;M H Molijn,&nbsp;J Gorgels,&nbsp;J M van der Linden,&nbsp;L K Ko","doi":"10.1159/000223252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility and acceptability for the blood donor of an intensified blood donor interviewing procedure on high-risk factors for infectious diseases. To answer the question whether an intensified blood donor interviewing procedure would lead to an unacceptable loss of blood donors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Feasibility study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Red Cross Bloodbank Rotterdam. DONORS: Study group of 240 first-time donors.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Intensified donor interviewing techniques by direct questioning and workload assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intensified interviewing was welcomed by 88-91% of first-time donors and rejected by 2-5%. On the question whether the intensified interviewing procedure should be the standard approach of the blood bank the answer was positive in 76-82% of first-time donors and negative in 11-14%. No blood donors indicated that this would be a reason to withdraw from blood donation. The workload for the blood bank physician increased by approximately 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The approach of intensified donor interviewing techniques in first-time donors is acceptable both to the donors and the blood bank workload.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"23 1","pages":"32-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000223252","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensification of donor interviewing procedures: a feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"D J van Rhenen,&nbsp;M H Molijn,&nbsp;J Gorgels,&nbsp;J M van der Linden,&nbsp;L K Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000223252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility and acceptability for the blood donor of an intensified blood donor interviewing procedure on high-risk factors for infectious diseases. To answer the question whether an intensified blood donor interviewing procedure would lead to an unacceptable loss of blood donors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Feasibility study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Red Cross Bloodbank Rotterdam. DONORS: Study group of 240 first-time donors.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Intensified donor interviewing techniques by direct questioning and workload assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intensified interviewing was welcomed by 88-91% of first-time donors and rejected by 2-5%. On the question whether the intensified interviewing procedure should be the standard approach of the blood bank the answer was positive in 76-82% of first-time donors and negative in 11-14%. No blood donors indicated that this would be a reason to withdraw from blood donation. The workload for the blood bank physician increased by approximately 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The approach of intensified donor interviewing techniques in first-time donors is acceptable both to the donors and the blood bank workload.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"32-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000223252\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000223252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000223252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨强化献血者传染病高危因素访谈程序的可行性和可接受性。为了回答加强献血者访谈程序是否会导致不可接受的献血者流失的问题。设计:可行性研究。背景:鹿特丹红十字血库。献血者:由240名首次献血者组成的研究组。干预措施:通过直接询问和工作量评估加强捐助者访谈技术。结果:88-91%的首次献血者欢迎强化面谈,2-5%的人拒绝面谈。对于强化访谈程序是否应成为血库的标准做法的问题,76-82%的首次献血者回答是肯定的,11-14%的人回答是否定的。没有献血者表示这将成为退出献血的理由。血库医生的工作量增加了大约30%。结论:在首次献血者中采用强化的献血者访谈技术,对献血者和血库的工作量都是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensification of donor interviewing procedures: a feasibility study.

Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability for the blood donor of an intensified blood donor interviewing procedure on high-risk factors for infectious diseases. To answer the question whether an intensified blood donor interviewing procedure would lead to an unacceptable loss of blood donors.

Design: Feasibility study.

Setting: Red Cross Bloodbank Rotterdam. DONORS: Study group of 240 first-time donors.

Interventions: Intensified donor interviewing techniques by direct questioning and workload assessment.

Results: Intensified interviewing was welcomed by 88-91% of first-time donors and rejected by 2-5%. On the question whether the intensified interviewing procedure should be the standard approach of the blood bank the answer was positive in 76-82% of first-time donors and negative in 11-14%. No blood donors indicated that this would be a reason to withdraw from blood donation. The workload for the blood bank physician increased by approximately 30%.

Conclusion: The approach of intensified donor interviewing techniques in first-time donors is acceptable both to the donors and the blood bank workload.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信