门诊麻醉后护理患者预后研究的综合回顾:1982 - 1993。

Journal of post anesthesia nursing Pub Date : 1995-10-01
S J Fetzer, J Vogelsang
{"title":"门诊麻醉后护理患者预后研究的综合回顾:1982 - 1993。","authors":"S J Fetzer,&nbsp;J Vogelsang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specialty nursing practice tends to define itself by a set of competencies believed to be essential by the practitioner. A specialty practice is rarely the result of patient outcome research. Although nurses have been caring for postoperative patients since the early 1900s, a review of published ambulatory postanesthesia patient outcome nursing research has not been reported. As part of a larger study, an integrative review of ambulatory postanesthesia research was conducted to investigate adherence to the scientific method and to examine whether reported research findings link nursing process with patient outcome. Data were collected from identified ambulatory postanesthesia research studies published between 1982 and 1993. The tables of contents from 16 nursing journals were examined to identify published studies. The sample for the integrative review consisted of 28 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data from the 28 studies were collected independently by two researchers on Ambulatory Post Anesthesia Research Literature Instrument (APARLI) coding sheets developed for the review. Findings indicated that the scientific method was used with varied levels of sophistication. The linkage of nursing process with patient outcome did not appear explicitly in the research studies reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of post anesthesia nursing","volume":"10 5","pages":"249-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrative review of ambulatory postanesthesia nursing patient outcome research: 1982 to 1993.\",\"authors\":\"S J Fetzer,&nbsp;J Vogelsang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Specialty nursing practice tends to define itself by a set of competencies believed to be essential by the practitioner. A specialty practice is rarely the result of patient outcome research. Although nurses have been caring for postoperative patients since the early 1900s, a review of published ambulatory postanesthesia patient outcome nursing research has not been reported. As part of a larger study, an integrative review of ambulatory postanesthesia research was conducted to investigate adherence to the scientific method and to examine whether reported research findings link nursing process with patient outcome. Data were collected from identified ambulatory postanesthesia research studies published between 1982 and 1993. The tables of contents from 16 nursing journals were examined to identify published studies. The sample for the integrative review consisted of 28 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data from the 28 studies were collected independently by two researchers on Ambulatory Post Anesthesia Research Literature Instrument (APARLI) coding sheets developed for the review. Findings indicated that the scientific method was used with varied levels of sophistication. The linkage of nursing process with patient outcome did not appear explicitly in the research studies reviewed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of post anesthesia nursing\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"249-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of post anesthesia nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of post anesthesia nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专业护理实践倾向于通过一套被从业者认为是必不可少的能力来定义自己。专业实践很少是患者结果研究的结果。虽然护士从20世纪初就开始照顾术后患者,但对已发表的门诊麻醉后患者结局护理研究的回顾尚未见报道。作为一项更大的研究的一部分,对门诊麻醉后研究进行了综合回顾,以调查对科学方法的依从性,并检查报告的研究结果是否将护理过程与患者预后联系起来。数据收集自1982年至1993年间发表的确定的门诊麻醉后研究。我们检查了16份护理期刊的目录,以确定已发表的研究。综合评价的样本包括28项符合纳入标准的研究。28项研究的数据由两名研究人员在门诊麻醉研究文献仪器(APARLI)编码表上独立收集。调查结果表明,科学方法的使用程度各不相同。护理过程与患者预后的联系并没有明确出现在研究综述中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An integrative review of ambulatory postanesthesia nursing patient outcome research: 1982 to 1993.

Specialty nursing practice tends to define itself by a set of competencies believed to be essential by the practitioner. A specialty practice is rarely the result of patient outcome research. Although nurses have been caring for postoperative patients since the early 1900s, a review of published ambulatory postanesthesia patient outcome nursing research has not been reported. As part of a larger study, an integrative review of ambulatory postanesthesia research was conducted to investigate adherence to the scientific method and to examine whether reported research findings link nursing process with patient outcome. Data were collected from identified ambulatory postanesthesia research studies published between 1982 and 1993. The tables of contents from 16 nursing journals were examined to identify published studies. The sample for the integrative review consisted of 28 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data from the 28 studies were collected independently by two researchers on Ambulatory Post Anesthesia Research Literature Instrument (APARLI) coding sheets developed for the review. Findings indicated that the scientific method was used with varied levels of sophistication. The linkage of nursing process with patient outcome did not appear explicitly in the research studies reviewed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信