Iobitridol 300与ioproide 300的比较——一项全身CT临床耐受性的双盲随机iii期研究。

Acta radiologica. Supplementum Pub Date : 1996-01-01
H M Hoogewoud, B Woessmer
{"title":"Iobitridol 300与ioproide 300的比较——一项全身CT临床耐受性的双盲随机iii期研究。","authors":"H M Hoogewoud,&nbsp;B Woessmer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>PURPOSE, MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical safety of iobitriodol 300 mg I/ml and iopromide 300 mg I/ml were compared in a randomized double blind phase-III study conducted on 60 patients undergoing abdominal CT for a variety of indications. Each examination was rated as diagnostic or nondiagnostic and the image quality was noted. Nature, onset, intensity as well as outcome of each adverse reaction were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in imaging quality and side effects between the contrast media. In this study, both iobitridol and iopromide provided excellent image quality and a low rate of side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Iobitridol is a safe and effective nonionic contrast agent for contrast-enhanced body CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7159,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica. Supplementum","volume":"400 ","pages":"62-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iobitridol 300 compared to iopromide 300--a double-blind randomized phase-III study of clinical tolerance in total body CT.\",\"authors\":\"H M Hoogewoud,&nbsp;B Woessmer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>PURPOSE, MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical safety of iobitriodol 300 mg I/ml and iopromide 300 mg I/ml were compared in a randomized double blind phase-III study conducted on 60 patients undergoing abdominal CT for a variety of indications. Each examination was rated as diagnostic or nondiagnostic and the image quality was noted. Nature, onset, intensity as well as outcome of each adverse reaction were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in imaging quality and side effects between the contrast media. In this study, both iobitridol and iopromide provided excellent image quality and a low rate of side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Iobitridol is a safe and effective nonionic contrast agent for contrast-enhanced body CT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"400 \",\"pages\":\"62-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的、材料和方法:在一项随机双盲iii期研究中,对60例因各种适应症接受腹部CT检查的患者进行了碘比妥300mg I/ml和碘丙啶300mg I/ml的临床安全性进行了比较。每次检查被评为诊断性或非诊断性,并记录图像质量。记录各不良反应的性质、发生、强度及转归。结果:两种造影剂在成像质量和不良反应方面无显著差异。在本研究中,碘比醇和碘丙胺均具有良好的图像质量和低的副作用率。结论:碘比啶醇是一种安全有效的非离子型体CT增强造影剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iobitridol 300 compared to iopromide 300--a double-blind randomized phase-III study of clinical tolerance in total body CT.

Unlabelled: PURPOSE, MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical safety of iobitriodol 300 mg I/ml and iopromide 300 mg I/ml were compared in a randomized double blind phase-III study conducted on 60 patients undergoing abdominal CT for a variety of indications. Each examination was rated as diagnostic or nondiagnostic and the image quality was noted. Nature, onset, intensity as well as outcome of each adverse reaction were recorded.

Results: There was no significant difference in imaging quality and side effects between the contrast media. In this study, both iobitridol and iopromide provided excellent image quality and a low rate of side effects.

Conclusion: Iobitridol is a safe and effective nonionic contrast agent for contrast-enhanced body CT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信