绒毛膜癌及侵袭性痣诊断评分系统在越南的临床研究。

T H Phan, T N Nguyen, V Q Phan
{"title":"绒毛膜癌及侵袭性痣诊断评分系统在越南的临床研究。","authors":"T H Phan,&nbsp;T N Nguyen,&nbsp;V Q Phan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to discriminate preoperatively invasive mole (IM) and choriocarcinoma (CC) in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasm (GTN) for early and satisfactory treatment in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 1990, 122 patients with GTN treated at TUDU Hospital were retrospectively analysed to make a differential diagnosis between CC and IM by using the JSOG scoring system and these results were later compared with postoperative histopathological findings. Furthermore, to raise the predictive diagnostic value for CC, the authors modified the JSOG system and devised a scoring system of TUDU hospital which results were compared with that of the JSOG ones. From the end of 1990 to March 1993, in 151 patients with GTN who underwent surgery, preoperative and postoperative diagnoses of CC and IM were prospectively compared using the JSOG and the modified scoring system. The comparative data were statistically analysed using the t-test, chi 2 test and Fisher test. The sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive value, and false positive and false negative were calculated and compared. RESULTS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY: In making a predictive diagnosis of 122 patients with findings of trophoblastic tumors, the authors found some differences in possibility of CC of the following subfactors: latent period, primary lesion, pulmonary metastases, metastases except pulmonary metastases and hCG rerise. So, a modified scoring system of TUDU hospital was devised.</p><p><strong>Prospective study: </strong>Of 151 Vietnamese patients with GTN using the JSOG scoring system and the modified system, a diagnostic probability in 108 cases predicted choriocarcinoma by JSOG scoring system was 61%, while that of invasive mole in 43 cases was 62.8%. Accordingly, the false positive rate for invasive mole of 64 cases predicted choriocarcinoma was 38.9%. According to the modified scoring system, of 75 patients predicted choriocarcinoma, 69 patients were histologically confirmed choriocarcinoma. Therefore, the diagnostic specificity was high (94.20%) and the false positive rate was low (5.3%), while of 76 patients predicted invasive mole, 13 patients were histologically diagnosed as choriocarcinoma. Accordingly, the false negative rate was low (13.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified JSOG scoring system is of more diagnostic value in the preoperative differentiation between CC and IM in Vietnam.</p>","PeriodicalId":79432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":"21 3","pages":"257-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical trial on diagnostic scoring system of choriocarcinoma and invasive mole in Vietnam.\",\"authors\":\"T H Phan,&nbsp;T N Nguyen,&nbsp;V Q Phan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to discriminate preoperatively invasive mole (IM) and choriocarcinoma (CC) in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasm (GTN) for early and satisfactory treatment in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 1990, 122 patients with GTN treated at TUDU Hospital were retrospectively analysed to make a differential diagnosis between CC and IM by using the JSOG scoring system and these results were later compared with postoperative histopathological findings. Furthermore, to raise the predictive diagnostic value for CC, the authors modified the JSOG system and devised a scoring system of TUDU hospital which results were compared with that of the JSOG ones. From the end of 1990 to March 1993, in 151 patients with GTN who underwent surgery, preoperative and postoperative diagnoses of CC and IM were prospectively compared using the JSOG and the modified scoring system. The comparative data were statistically analysed using the t-test, chi 2 test and Fisher test. The sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive value, and false positive and false negative were calculated and compared. RESULTS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY: In making a predictive diagnosis of 122 patients with findings of trophoblastic tumors, the authors found some differences in possibility of CC of the following subfactors: latent period, primary lesion, pulmonary metastases, metastases except pulmonary metastases and hCG rerise. So, a modified scoring system of TUDU hospital was devised.</p><p><strong>Prospective study: </strong>Of 151 Vietnamese patients with GTN using the JSOG scoring system and the modified system, a diagnostic probability in 108 cases predicted choriocarcinoma by JSOG scoring system was 61%, while that of invasive mole in 43 cases was 62.8%. Accordingly, the false positive rate for invasive mole of 64 cases predicted choriocarcinoma was 38.9%. According to the modified scoring system, of 75 patients predicted choriocarcinoma, 69 patients were histologically confirmed choriocarcinoma. Therefore, the diagnostic specificity was high (94.20%) and the false positive rate was low (5.3%), while of 76 patients predicted invasive mole, 13 patients were histologically diagnosed as choriocarcinoma. Accordingly, the false negative rate was low (13.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified JSOG scoring system is of more diagnostic value in the preoperative differentiation between CC and IM in Vietnam.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"257-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是在越南鉴别妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)患者术前浸润性痣(IM)和绒毛膜癌(CC),以便早期和满意的治疗。方法:回顾性分析1990年我院收治的122例GTN患者,采用JSOG评分系统进行CC与IM的鉴别诊断,并与术后组织病理学结果进行比较。为了提高对CC的预测诊断价值,对JSOG系统进行了改进,设计了一套图大医院CC评分系统,并与JSOG评分系统进行了比较。自1990年底至1993年3月,对151例接受手术治疗的GTN患者,采用JSOG和改进的评分系统,对术前和术后CC和IM的诊断进行前瞻性比较。比较资料采用t检验、chi 2检验和Fisher检验进行统计学分析。计算并比较其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、假阳性预测值和假阴性预测值。结果:回顾性研究:对122例有滋养细胞肿瘤的患者进行预测诊断,作者发现以下亚因素在CC的可能性方面存在差异:潜伏期、原发病灶、肺转移、肺转移以外的转移和hCG逆转。为此,设计了一套改进的图大医院评分系统。前瞻性研究:151例越南GTN患者采用JSOG评分系统及改进后的系统,其中108例预测绒毛膜癌,JSOG评分系统预测绒毛膜癌的诊断概率为61%,43例预测浸润性痣的诊断概率为62.8%。64例浸润性痣预测绒毛膜癌的假阳性率为38.9%。根据改进的评分系统,75例预测绒毛膜癌的患者中,69例经组织学证实为绒毛膜癌。因此,诊断特异性高(94.20%),假阳性率低(5.3%),而在预测侵袭性痣的76例患者中,13例患者病理诊断为绒毛膜癌。因此,假阴性率较低(13.1%)。结论:改进后的JSOG评分系统对越南CC和IM的术前鉴别更有诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A clinical trial on diagnostic scoring system of choriocarcinoma and invasive mole in Vietnam.

Objectives: The aim was to discriminate preoperatively invasive mole (IM) and choriocarcinoma (CC) in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasm (GTN) for early and satisfactory treatment in Vietnam.

Methods: In 1990, 122 patients with GTN treated at TUDU Hospital were retrospectively analysed to make a differential diagnosis between CC and IM by using the JSOG scoring system and these results were later compared with postoperative histopathological findings. Furthermore, to raise the predictive diagnostic value for CC, the authors modified the JSOG system and devised a scoring system of TUDU hospital which results were compared with that of the JSOG ones. From the end of 1990 to March 1993, in 151 patients with GTN who underwent surgery, preoperative and postoperative diagnoses of CC and IM were prospectively compared using the JSOG and the modified scoring system. The comparative data were statistically analysed using the t-test, chi 2 test and Fisher test. The sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive value, and false positive and false negative were calculated and compared. RESULTS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY: In making a predictive diagnosis of 122 patients with findings of trophoblastic tumors, the authors found some differences in possibility of CC of the following subfactors: latent period, primary lesion, pulmonary metastases, metastases except pulmonary metastases and hCG rerise. So, a modified scoring system of TUDU hospital was devised.

Prospective study: Of 151 Vietnamese patients with GTN using the JSOG scoring system and the modified system, a diagnostic probability in 108 cases predicted choriocarcinoma by JSOG scoring system was 61%, while that of invasive mole in 43 cases was 62.8%. Accordingly, the false positive rate for invasive mole of 64 cases predicted choriocarcinoma was 38.9%. According to the modified scoring system, of 75 patients predicted choriocarcinoma, 69 patients were histologically confirmed choriocarcinoma. Therefore, the diagnostic specificity was high (94.20%) and the false positive rate was low (5.3%), while of 76 patients predicted invasive mole, 13 patients were histologically diagnosed as choriocarcinoma. Accordingly, the false negative rate was low (13.1%).

Conclusion: The modified JSOG scoring system is of more diagnostic value in the preoperative differentiation between CC and IM in Vietnam.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信