医学概念编码:用计算机化编码工具进行的对照实验。

J H Hohnloser, F Pürner, P Kadlec
{"title":"医学概念编码:用计算机化编码工具进行的对照实验。","authors":"J H Hohnloser,&nbsp;F Pürner,&nbsp;P Kadlec","doi":"10.1007/BF02332688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical routine there is a growing need to encode medical concepts with available standard coding systems. The coding process can be time consuming and may significantly add to daily paperwork, particularly regarding patients with multiple diagnoses and in busy clinical environments with a high turnover of patients. We have developed a generic computerised encoding tool--the PADS encoder--to ensure rapid, correct and complete coding of diagnoses in daily routine. The tool is integrated into an electronic patient record system (PADS, Patient Archiving & Documentation System) and takes full advantage of the user friendly Macintosh interface. The tool was tested in a controlled experiment by 18 clinicians who encoded a total of 666 medical concepts in each protocol (study protocol vs. control). The following positive findings were significantly associated with the use of the computerised coding tool: the number of correctly encoded medical concepts was higher (99.55% vs. 86.1%), coding errors were lower (0% vs. 10.81%), more modifier codes were encoded correctly (increase by up to 43%), less coding errors were made (decrease by up to 43%), the overall rate of correctly encoded and complete main and modifier codes was increased by 31.27% (97.29% vs. 66.02%), coding time was reduced by 50%. This paper presents data to suggest that a computerised coding tool can produce more complete data of higher quality and can save time compared with the traditional approach to encode medical concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"12 3","pages":"141-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02332688","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coding medical concepts: a controlled experiment with a computerised coding tool.\",\"authors\":\"J H Hohnloser,&nbsp;F Pürner,&nbsp;P Kadlec\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02332688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In clinical routine there is a growing need to encode medical concepts with available standard coding systems. The coding process can be time consuming and may significantly add to daily paperwork, particularly regarding patients with multiple diagnoses and in busy clinical environments with a high turnover of patients. We have developed a generic computerised encoding tool--the PADS encoder--to ensure rapid, correct and complete coding of diagnoses in daily routine. The tool is integrated into an electronic patient record system (PADS, Patient Archiving & Documentation System) and takes full advantage of the user friendly Macintosh interface. The tool was tested in a controlled experiment by 18 clinicians who encoded a total of 666 medical concepts in each protocol (study protocol vs. control). The following positive findings were significantly associated with the use of the computerised coding tool: the number of correctly encoded medical concepts was higher (99.55% vs. 86.1%), coding errors were lower (0% vs. 10.81%), more modifier codes were encoded correctly (increase by up to 43%), less coding errors were made (decrease by up to 43%), the overall rate of correctly encoded and complete main and modifier codes was increased by 31.27% (97.29% vs. 66.02%), coding time was reduced by 50%. This paper presents data to suggest that a computerised coding tool can produce more complete data of higher quality and can save time compared with the traditional approach to encode medical concepts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"141-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02332688\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02332688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02332688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在临床常规中,越来越需要用可用的标准编码系统对医学概念进行编码。编码过程可能非常耗时,并且可能会大大增加日常文书工作,特别是对于患有多种诊断的患者以及患者流动率高的繁忙临床环境。我们开发了一种通用的计算机编码工具- PADS编码器,以确保日常诊断的快速,正确和完整的编码。该工具集成到一个电子病人记录系统(PADS,病人档案和文件系统),并充分利用用户友好的Macintosh界面。18名临床医生在对照实验中对该工具进行了测试,他们在每个方案(研究方案与对照)中编码了总共666个医学概念。以下积极的结果与使用电脑编码工具有显著的关系:医学概念编码正确率较高(99.55%比86.1%),编码错误率较低(0%比10.81%),修饰符编码正确率较高(增幅达43%),编码错误率较低(降幅达43%),主、修饰符编码正确率和完成率总体提高31.27%(97.29%比66.02%),编码时间减少50%。本文提供的数据表明,与传统的医学概念编码方法相比,计算机化编码工具可以产生更完整、更高质量的数据,并且可以节省时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coding medical concepts: a controlled experiment with a computerised coding tool.

In clinical routine there is a growing need to encode medical concepts with available standard coding systems. The coding process can be time consuming and may significantly add to daily paperwork, particularly regarding patients with multiple diagnoses and in busy clinical environments with a high turnover of patients. We have developed a generic computerised encoding tool--the PADS encoder--to ensure rapid, correct and complete coding of diagnoses in daily routine. The tool is integrated into an electronic patient record system (PADS, Patient Archiving & Documentation System) and takes full advantage of the user friendly Macintosh interface. The tool was tested in a controlled experiment by 18 clinicians who encoded a total of 666 medical concepts in each protocol (study protocol vs. control). The following positive findings were significantly associated with the use of the computerised coding tool: the number of correctly encoded medical concepts was higher (99.55% vs. 86.1%), coding errors were lower (0% vs. 10.81%), more modifier codes were encoded correctly (increase by up to 43%), less coding errors were made (decrease by up to 43%), the overall rate of correctly encoded and complete main and modifier codes was increased by 31.27% (97.29% vs. 66.02%), coding time was reduced by 50%. This paper presents data to suggest that a computerised coding tool can produce more complete data of higher quality and can save time compared with the traditional approach to encode medical concepts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信