内镜超声在胃癌TN分期中的应用。计算机断层扫描与常规超声的比较[j]。

C Nattermann, R Galbenu-Grünwald, H Nier, H Dancygier
{"title":"内镜超声在胃癌TN分期中的应用。计算机断层扫描与常规超声的比较[j]。","authors":"C Nattermann,&nbsp;R Galbenu-Grünwald,&nbsp;H Nier,&nbsp;H Dancygier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>64 patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma were investigated by endosonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and conventional transcutaneous sonography (US). In 50 patients a resection of the stomach was performed and the histological findings were compared with the results of preoperative staging. In all cases EUS was successful in demonstrating the tumour. With CT tumour visualisation was possible in 17 (35.4%), with US in 7 (14.6%) cases. The pT-stage was correctly determined preoperatively by EUS in 40 (81.6%) with CT and US in only 12 (25%) and 4 (8.3%) patients, respectively. The staging accuracy of EUS amounted to 80% in T1-, 81% in T2-, 100% in T3-, and 67% in T4-stage. The sensitivity in demonstrating lymph node metastases was 81.3% for EUS, 25.8% for CT and 9.7% for US. The specificity in this regard was 72.2% for EUS, 83.3% for CT and 100% for EUS. The overall accuracy for determination of pN-stage was 78% for EUS, 47.9% for CT and 41.7% for US. EUS is clearly superior to CT and US in the locoregional TN-staging of gastric carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":23901,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur die gesamte innere Medizin und ihre Grenzgebiete","volume":"48 2","pages":"60-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Endoscopic ultrasound in TN staging of stomach cancer. A comparison with computerized tomography and conventional ultrasound].\",\"authors\":\"C Nattermann,&nbsp;R Galbenu-Grünwald,&nbsp;H Nier,&nbsp;H Dancygier\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>64 patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma were investigated by endosonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and conventional transcutaneous sonography (US). In 50 patients a resection of the stomach was performed and the histological findings were compared with the results of preoperative staging. In all cases EUS was successful in demonstrating the tumour. With CT tumour visualisation was possible in 17 (35.4%), with US in 7 (14.6%) cases. The pT-stage was correctly determined preoperatively by EUS in 40 (81.6%) with CT and US in only 12 (25%) and 4 (8.3%) patients, respectively. The staging accuracy of EUS amounted to 80% in T1-, 81% in T2-, 100% in T3-, and 67% in T4-stage. The sensitivity in demonstrating lymph node metastases was 81.3% for EUS, 25.8% for CT and 9.7% for US. The specificity in this regard was 72.2% for EUS, 83.3% for CT and 100% for EUS. The overall accuracy for determination of pN-stage was 78% for EUS, 47.9% for CT and 41.7% for US. EUS is clearly superior to CT and US in the locoregional TN-staging of gastric carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur die gesamte innere Medizin und ihre Grenzgebiete\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"60-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur die gesamte innere Medizin und ihre Grenzgebiete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur die gesamte innere Medizin und ihre Grenzgebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对64例经组织学证实的胃癌患者进行了内镜超声(EUS)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和常规经皮超声(US)检查。50例患者行胃切除术,并将组织学结果与术前分期结果进行比较。在所有病例中,EUS都能成功地显示肿瘤。CT显示17例(35.4%),超声显示7例(14.6%)。40例(81.6%)患者术前通过EUS正确判断pt分期,CT和US分别只有12例(25%)和4例(8.3%)。EUS分期准确率T1-期为80%,T2-期为81%,T3-期为100%,t4期为67%。EUS显示淋巴结转移的敏感性为81.3%,CT为25.8%,US为9.7%。在这方面,EUS的特异性为72.2%,CT为83.3%,EUS为100%。EUS诊断pn期的总体准确率为78%,CT为47.9%,US为41.7%。在胃癌的局部n分期中,EUS明显优于CT和US。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Endoscopic ultrasound in TN staging of stomach cancer. A comparison with computerized tomography and conventional ultrasound].

64 patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma were investigated by endosonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and conventional transcutaneous sonography (US). In 50 patients a resection of the stomach was performed and the histological findings were compared with the results of preoperative staging. In all cases EUS was successful in demonstrating the tumour. With CT tumour visualisation was possible in 17 (35.4%), with US in 7 (14.6%) cases. The pT-stage was correctly determined preoperatively by EUS in 40 (81.6%) with CT and US in only 12 (25%) and 4 (8.3%) patients, respectively. The staging accuracy of EUS amounted to 80% in T1-, 81% in T2-, 100% in T3-, and 67% in T4-stage. The sensitivity in demonstrating lymph node metastases was 81.3% for EUS, 25.8% for CT and 9.7% for US. The specificity in this regard was 72.2% for EUS, 83.3% for CT and 100% for EUS. The overall accuracy for determination of pN-stage was 78% for EUS, 47.9% for CT and 41.7% for US. EUS is clearly superior to CT and US in the locoregional TN-staging of gastric carcinoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信