小反刍动物尿石症的外科治疗。

The Cornell veterinarian Pub Date : 1993-01-01
M L Haven, K F Bowman, T A Engelbert, A T Blikslager
{"title":"小反刍动物尿石症的外科治疗。","authors":"M L Haven,&nbsp;K F Bowman,&nbsp;T A Engelbert,&nbsp;A T Blikslager","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty-one cases of urolithiasis in small ruminants were examined to evaluate the efficacy of various surgical treatments. Of 21 cases, all but 1 had multiple calculi. Urethral process amputation and medical therapy either did not relieve the obstruction or provided only temporary relief (< 36 hours) in 14 of 16 cases. In 2 cases, obstruction recurred in 1 year and 4 years, respectively, after urethral process amputation. Ten of 13 animals that had perineal urethrostomy (PU) experienced short-term complications, including postoperative hemorrhage, dehiscence of the surgical wound, and subcutaneous accumulation of urine. Urethral stricture occurred in 7 of 9 animals in which follow-up information was obtained, and long-term survival was 55%. Cystotomy alone was performed on 8 of 21 cases, and 7 of 8 (88%) were healthy at the time of follow-up. In order to relieve the obstruction with cystotomy alone, multiple attempts at normograde and retrograde flushing were required. Cystotomy allowed removal of multiple calculi, bidirectional flushing of the urethra, and posed less risk for short-term postoperative complications and urethral stricture. These data suggest that cystotomy was more effective than PU for the management of urolithiasis in small ruminants.</p>","PeriodicalId":22466,"journal":{"name":"The Cornell veterinarian","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of urolithiasis in small ruminants.\",\"authors\":\"M L Haven,&nbsp;K F Bowman,&nbsp;T A Engelbert,&nbsp;A T Blikslager\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Twenty-one cases of urolithiasis in small ruminants were examined to evaluate the efficacy of various surgical treatments. Of 21 cases, all but 1 had multiple calculi. Urethral process amputation and medical therapy either did not relieve the obstruction or provided only temporary relief (< 36 hours) in 14 of 16 cases. In 2 cases, obstruction recurred in 1 year and 4 years, respectively, after urethral process amputation. Ten of 13 animals that had perineal urethrostomy (PU) experienced short-term complications, including postoperative hemorrhage, dehiscence of the surgical wound, and subcutaneous accumulation of urine. Urethral stricture occurred in 7 of 9 animals in which follow-up information was obtained, and long-term survival was 55%. Cystotomy alone was performed on 8 of 21 cases, and 7 of 8 (88%) were healthy at the time of follow-up. In order to relieve the obstruction with cystotomy alone, multiple attempts at normograde and retrograde flushing were required. Cystotomy allowed removal of multiple calculi, bidirectional flushing of the urethra, and posed less risk for short-term postoperative complications and urethral stricture. These data suggest that cystotomy was more effective than PU for the management of urolithiasis in small ruminants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cornell veterinarian\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cornell veterinarian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cornell veterinarian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对21例小反刍动物尿石症进行了检查,评价各种手术治疗方法的疗效。21例中除1例外均有多发结石。在16例患者中,有14例行尿道突截肢和药物治疗均不能缓解梗阻或仅能暂时缓解梗阻(< 36小时)。2例尿路梗阻分别于尿道突截肢术后1年和4年复发。13只接受会阴尿道造口术(PU)的动物中有10只出现了短期并发症,包括术后出血、手术伤口裂开和皮下积尿。获得随访资料的9只动物中有7只发生尿道狭窄,长期生存率为55%。21例患者中有8例单独行膀胱切除术,随访时7例(88%)健康。为了单纯切除膀胱以解除梗阻,需要多次尝试顺行和逆行冲洗。膀胱切开术可以清除多发结石,双向冲洗尿道,短期术后并发症和尿道狭窄的风险较小。这些数据表明,对于小反刍动物尿石症的治疗,膀胱切开术比PU更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management of urolithiasis in small ruminants.

Twenty-one cases of urolithiasis in small ruminants were examined to evaluate the efficacy of various surgical treatments. Of 21 cases, all but 1 had multiple calculi. Urethral process amputation and medical therapy either did not relieve the obstruction or provided only temporary relief (< 36 hours) in 14 of 16 cases. In 2 cases, obstruction recurred in 1 year and 4 years, respectively, after urethral process amputation. Ten of 13 animals that had perineal urethrostomy (PU) experienced short-term complications, including postoperative hemorrhage, dehiscence of the surgical wound, and subcutaneous accumulation of urine. Urethral stricture occurred in 7 of 9 animals in which follow-up information was obtained, and long-term survival was 55%. Cystotomy alone was performed on 8 of 21 cases, and 7 of 8 (88%) were healthy at the time of follow-up. In order to relieve the obstruction with cystotomy alone, multiple attempts at normograde and retrograde flushing were required. Cystotomy allowed removal of multiple calculi, bidirectional flushing of the urethra, and posed less risk for short-term postoperative complications and urethral stricture. These data suggest that cystotomy was more effective than PU for the management of urolithiasis in small ruminants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信